Agriculture Perspective Plan Support
Programme (APPSP),
District Support Unit, Kapilvastu
District
Program Completion Report, 2065
Prepared by: Shree Bhagavan Thakur
District Programme Advisor
Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program
District
Program Completion Report
2065
Submitted
by: Shree Bhagavan Thakur, DPA
APPSP,
District Support Unit
Kapilvastu
Submitted to: APPSP, CSU, and Plaza building Kathmandu.
Acknowledgement
The district project completion report
2064-65 is a part of DSU activity for submitting to APPSP, CSU Kathmandu,
prepared for the support of M&E purpose. We would like to acknowledge the
APPSP/CSU Kathmandu inspired us to write this annual report. To write this
report, we would like to acknowledge with gratitude, Dr. Indrakant Jha (Acting Program Manager) and Mr
Christopher Floyd (Program Advisor) who have given the great opportunity. We
would like to express acknowledge to ex Program Manger, Program Advisor Deputy
and Program Manager. We also acknowledge Mr. P.B. Shakya (Decentralized Service
Delivery Specialist), Mr. Ramesh Vishta (Monitoring and evaluation specialist)
and Mrs. Sangita Khadaka (Social Inclusion
specialist) who have encouraged writing this report.
Likewise, we would like to great fully
acknowledge Mr. Ram Mani Paudyal (RLSO, Bharahawa cluster) who suggested &
supported timely, concrete and effectively. We are particularly grateful to Mr.
Damodar Bhandari (LDO) for their kind cooperation and positive support during program
implementation. We also thank to all staff of DADO and DLSO, Kapilvastu (in
past and recently available, who helped in program implementation. We would
like to special thanks to all TSC, DADC and DDC members, who have given
concrete and fair decision in project evaluation and selection. We also hearty
acknowledge all the political parties, press representative, journalist, civil
society, in project monitoring, supporting directly and indirectly.
We
would acknowledge all the SPs. as they have successfully completed the projects
and contributed in achieving the purpose of the program with their efforts,
skills and resources. Like wise, we also acknowledge to all the farmers groups
for active participation. The agro vets, hard wares, skilled labour and other
service delivery agents are also equally acknowledged. We acknowledge the helped rendered by Mrs.
Shakti Karki Gupta (Program Assistant) for her skilful typing, data entry and
day to day support. Last but not least, we acknowledge Mr. Buddhi Sagar Bhattarai
for his help in DSu.
We would be happy if this report would
fulfil the needs of the M&E purpose of APPSP/CSU. We also apologize for any
mistakes in preparing this report.
Abstract
Agriculture
Perspective Plan Support Program (APPSP) is five year program supported by DFID
and MOAC of Govt. of Nepal from F.Y 2061-62 with the goal of Livelihood
Improvement of Rural People through establishment of DADF for expansion of
agriculture Service delivery by DEF & LIF projects. Interest of the program
is to increase the income of poor & excluded farming community (poor
producers, agricultural worker and consumers) towards livelihood improvement
and poverty reduction.
During
4 years period (FY.2061/62 to 2064/65), this program has made a substantial
achievements in area of inclusion of poor & excluded family of remote area
in the agricultural activity through DEF
and or LIF projects.
Till
now a total of 80 DEF & 322 LIF projects have been implemented with
coverage of 74 VDCs (96%) of the district. Among all 80 DEF & 277 LIF
projects have been completed successfully with receiving all the installments.
There are only 45 LIF projects have not been completed with receiving all the
installments due to not timely settlements, lack of fund, dispute in groups and
lack of information and awareness of proper process by the groups. For
completion of LIF projects various efforts have been made through information.
Among
72,932 HHs of the district, till this period program has been succeeded to
benefit of 18583 HHs (25%) from 900 farmers groups of both Agricultural (462) ,
Livestock (224) and mixed type (214). Among the total households, 52% female,
33% Dalit, 25% disadvantaged non dalit, 15% disadvantaged Janjati, 9 %
religious minorities and Advantaged Janjati are very minimum under benefit. The
total of 84% of poor ( food sufficiency of less than 9 months) beneficiaries
have been covered by this program in this district.
More
no of projects were of vegetable production with irrigation and goat keeping
type. There are also other different types of project with few in number i.e.
Bee keeping, Banana farming, fish farming, pig rearing, TPS potato, mush room,
Poultry, Cattle shed floor construction,
Vegetable market shed construction, irrigation
, Chilling vat and buffalo rearing, mushroom, turmeric farming and off
seasonal onion production.
For
irrigation of small holding land, Treadle pumps, tube well, Diesel pump sets,
electric motors have been supported to the projects. There are constructed of
dam, check dam have been constructed and farmers are benefiting.
Group
farmers have been benefited with getting various type of trainings, timely
support of improved inputs (seeds, suckers, pesticides, micronutrients, goat,
piglets, he goats, buffalo bull, bee hive and colony) and appropriate tools and
implements (sprayer tank, bee veil, honey extractor, water cane, weighing
balance, vegetable carrying carts, milk canes, chilling vats set etc. They have
received technical support by technicians time to time for technical back
stopping.
There
were more no. of NGOs (52) are involved
in DEF projects as SPs, followed by cooperative (15) & CBOs (9). One year
duration of projects (39) were more in number than 6 month period (38), 9 month
period (2) and only one projects of 18 month under DEF but all LIF projects are
of 6 month duration.
All
DEF & LIF projects have mainly focused on skill development through
training, technical back stopping &
group mobilization, income generation; irrigation support improved and
sustainable production of Agriculture & livestock towards poverty
reduction and realization of good
governance of remote rural poor through
decentralized service delivery mechanism.
DSU has facilitated 8 times proposal
evaluation by TSC, 14 times DADC meeting, 79 times in DEF/ LIF BMC meeting, 9
times SP coordination meeting, 3 times SP workshop, participated in line agencies and other
project meeting workshop.
A total of 770 times DEF /LIF on the
spot field monitoring have been don e by a multi sect oral team for effective
implementation of the program. Sixty two project orientation and 61 public
audits have been organized by SPs.
A total of NRs.48166 thousands had
been approved for expenditure of DADF project implementation, policy analysis,
SP workshop and dissemination & consultation including 5 % management cost.
But only Rs. 41898 (86.98%) amount of
released, Rs. 39888 (82.81%) amount have been expended for DADF project
implementation.
This
program made awareness to rural, remote, poor & excluded group regarding
adoption of new agriculture technology, improved seed & breed of livestock
for income generating activities. The Program
helped to increase the area under irrigation for production of different
crops al around the year and helped to empower local NGO, co-operative, CBOs
and Farmers groups. By this effect some times P&E voice heard for their rights. The production of
green vegetable & its consumption and goat's population has been
increasing. Seasonal export of vegetable can see in border instead of importing
in past. Utilization of local skill & resources has been increasing and
agricultural area is diversifying with this program in the district. It has
also helped peace building and maintaining good governance in society through
transparency, neutrality and participatory works. P&E groups of the out side project area
have realized support with the program and started seeking information for
receiving the projects.
In
spite of remarkable achievement, this program has faced few problems of
untimely proposal evaluation & contract out due to long process, untimely
budget release of approved amount, timely monitoring due to political
situation, and low capacity of SPs and F.Gs, insufficient budget for per
DEF/LIF, lack of technical support to LIF, no BMC empowerment activity, no
field verification mechanism, no assurance of continuity of program, which
effect in project implementation &
achieving goal and objectives smoothly.
For the purpose of knowing the
strength, weakness, opportunity and
threats of the program 9 lesson learning workshop have been organized at
different level at various location.
Abbreviation
AJ :
Advantaged janjati
APP :
Agriculture Perspective Plan
APPSP :
Agriculture Perspective Plan
Support Program
BMC :
Beneficiaries Monitoring
Committee
CBO :
Community based organization
CDO :
Chief District Officer
CSU :
Central Support Unit
DADC :
District Agriculture
Development Committee
DADF :
District Agriculture
Development Fund
DADO :
District Agriculture
Development Office
DDC : District Development Committee
DDF :
District Development Fund
DEF :
District Extension Fund
DFID :
Department for International
Development
DJ :
Disadvantaged janjati
DLSO :
District Livestock Service
Office
DMC :
District Monitoring Committee
DND :
Dis. advantaged non-dalit
DOA : Directorate of Agriculture
DPA :
District Program Advisor
DPC :
District Program Coordinator
D PM : Deputy Program Manager
DSU :
District Support Unit
DTO :
District Treasury Office
FG :
Farmers Groups
FY : Fiscal Year
GIS : Geographical Information System
IGA :
Income Generating Activity
JT : Junior Technician
JTA :
Junior Technical Assistant
LDO :
Local Development Officer
LFP :
Livelihood Forest
Program
LIF :
Local Initiative Fund
LLW :
Lesson Learning Workshop
M&E :
Monitoring & Evaluation
MOAC :
Ministry of Agriculture &
Cooperative
NGO :
Non-governmental Organization
PA : Program Advisor, Public Audit
PM : Program Manager
RLSO :
Regional Liaison Support
Officer
RM :
Religious Minorities
RSU :
Regional Support Unit
SAGA :
Social and Geographical Audit
SMS :
Subject Matter Specialist
SP :
Service provider
TMC : Technical Monitoring Committee
TSC :
Technical Sub-committee
UC :
Upper caste
VDC :
Village Development Committee
VCA :
Value Chain Approach
WDO :
Women Development Office
Part :1
District Program Completion Report
1.
District Brief
Kapilvastu
district lies in the Western Development Region of Nepal with an area of 1738
square km. It extends from 27025’ to 27084’ north
latitude and lies between to 82075’ to 830 14’ east longitudes.
The district of Kapilvastu is bordered by Rupendehi in the east, Dang and
Balrampur district of India on west, Arghakhanchi and Dang on the north and India
on south. The district headquarter is Taulihawa. The district has 77 Village
Development Committees (VDC) & 1 municipality. Geographically, more than 3
percent of the area is covered by hills, 88 percent by Siwalik plains and
remaining 9 percent by Plateau. The altitude ranges from 90 meters to 824
meters from msl.(mean sea local) . The
district extends 48 km in length & 34 km in breadth. Total literacy rate of
the population is 41.45 but female's is only 29.3 percent.
1.1 Demography
Total number of households, total
population, male and female population:
The total population of the district is 4,81,976 residing in
72,932 households and comprising of 2,47,875 males and 2,34,101 females.
Population is growing at a rate of 2.6 percent per annum. Population density is
277 persons per sq km. ( source: 13th District Development Plan, 2064/65)
Table:1
Population
by social groups and their respective percentage.
|
Details
|
Dalit
|
Disadvantage
Non Dalit
|
Disadvantage
Janjati
|
Advantage
Janjati
|
Religious
Minority
|
BCT
|
|
Population
|
86755
|
130326
|
80490
|
1928
|
93504
|
87237
|
|
Percentage
|
18
|
27.4
|
16.7
|
0.4
|
19.4
|
18.1
|
BCT= Bahun. Chhetri, Thakuri
1.2 Agricultural Situation
Food sufficiency; is the district food
sufficient?; Area and production of major crops; Land use distribution; area
under irrigation; agriculture infrastructure; market center, agriculture road,
major pocket areas.
The
total household of the district is 72,932 among those 77.65% of the household
depend on agriculture. There are 95.3% of the people live in rural areas.
Total
area of the district is 1, 73,800 hectares, cultivable land is 83,000 hectares
(47.75%) and cultivated land is 61,000 hectares (73.00% of the cultivable
land). Total irrigated area of the district is 29% only. The district
keeps 16th position in the
country in food supply.
Table:2
Land use pattern
|
S.N.
|
Detail
|
Unit
|
Area
|
Percentage
|
|
1
|
Total Area
|
Ha
|
173800
|
|
|
2
|
Cultivatable Land
|
Ha
|
83000
|
47.75 %
|
|
3
|
Cultivated khet land
|
Ha
|
61000
|
73.50 %
|
|
4
|
Upland
|
Ha
|
22000
|
|
|
5
|
Irrigated All-round the year
|
Ha
|
24300
|
40 %
|
|
6
|
Un irrigated area
|
Ha
|
58700
|
|
|
7
|
Seasonal irrigation
|
Ha
|
36700
|
60 %
|
|
8
|
Forest
|
Ha
|
73312
|
|
|
9
|
Grazing land
|
Ha
|
4400
|
|
|
10
|
Lakes and Pond
|
Ha
|
398
|
|
|
11
|
Others
|
Ha
|
6089
|
|
Source: Annual Progress Report, 2062-63, DADO
Kapilvastu.
Table :3
Situation of different crops Area, Production
& productivity
|
S.N.
|
Crops Name
|
Area (Hectors)
|
Area (Metric Ton)
|
Productivity Mt/Ha
|
|
1
|
Rice
|
69216
|
171655
|
2.74
|
|
2
|
Wheat
|
27560
|
52364
|
1.9
|
|
3
|
Maize
|
1200
|
2400
|
2
|
|
4
|
Pulses
|
9700
|
6062.5
|
0.63
|
|
5
|
Oil seed
|
3600
|
2347
|
0.65
|
|
6
|
Sugarcane
|
5710
|
274080
|
48
|
|
7
|
Potato
|
1985
|
21636
|
10.9
|
|
8
|
Honey
|
|
5
|
|
|
9
|
Mushroom
|
|
5
|
|
|
10
|
Vegetable
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
Off-seasonal
|
550
|
8250
|
15
|
|
10.2
|
Seasonal
|
1850
|
26825
|
14.5
|
|
11
|
Fruits
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
Banana
|
75
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
Mango
|
1613
|
|
|
Source: Annual Progress Report, 2062-63, DADO
Kapilvastu.
Total
fish ponds are 1335 covering 303 hectare total water shed area and total production of fish is 690 tones with
involvement of 510 fish farmers of 18 groups. There are 4 l big lakes covering
74 hectares are present in the district.
Table :4
Situation of Animal based products in
Kapilvastu of F.Y.2061-62
|
S.N.
|
Detail
|
Unit
|
Quantity
|
|
1
|
Milk Production
|
Mt.
|
20579.27
|
|
2
|
Meat Production
|
Mt.
|
3822.64
|
|
3
|
Egg Production
|
No.
|
3572833
|
|
4
|
Wool Production
|
Mt.
|
4.46
|
Source: Annual Progress Report, 2061-62,
DADO, Kapilvastu.
There are
150.27 km. black pitch road,402.19 km.gravel and777.2 km earthern road in the
district. There are 34 weekly and bi- weekly market/ hattia in the district for marketing the agriculture
products. Two vegetable collection centers Gotihawa and Bedauli are established
in the district abu nt in function. There are 12 major irrigation projects are
covering 5590 hectare of land under irrigation.
Agriculture faces a great challenge of feeding some 481976
people in Kapilvastu district and it has remained basically
subsistence-oriented with lower productivity. Of the total population of the
district 133,838 of male population and 87,835 of female population are
economically active and 44,131 of male and 79,162 of female are economically
inactive. With 84 percent of population engaged in agriculture Therefore,
agriculture sector is pivotal for any attempt to increase incomes, alleviate
widespread poverty and uplift living standards of this district. The
non-agriculture occupation/livelihood is limited only to 2,14072 of the
population, of which 393 is in Legislators/Senior, Officials, 6,297 is in
Prof./Semi Prof./Tech Workers, 125,684 is in Farm, Fishing and Forestry Worker,
1,846 is in Prod. Labor workers and
133,684rest are in others and not stated.
For
the service delivery and necessary support of farmers, there are four
Agriculture Service Centers (ASC) under District Agriculture Development Office
and 4 Livestock Service Centers and 11 Sub Livestock
Service Centers
under District Livestock Service Office in different location of the district.
In addition 3 farmers contact center have been managed by DADO. There are 78 fertilizer and pesticide traders
and agrovets for providing agri- inputs. Four fish hatchery (nursery) are
available for supplying and hatchling and fingerling. There are one bee keeping
resource center and 2 bee keeping
co-operatives in the district.
There are 3 Agriculture Development
banks, 5 small farmer development project, 1 banking office and 2 National
commercial banks are available for financial investment. There are 123 various
types of registered co-operatives promoted by District co-operative Divisional
Office, Women Development Office and others for easy service of the farmers.
There are more than 350 numbers of
Non-Governmental Organizations of various purposes, have been registered in
District Administrative Office.
1.3 Problems and Issues of Kapilvastu
(According to Five Year Periodic Plan of DDC,
Kapilvastu; 2059)
- Most
of the farmers of the district are depend on subsistence or traditional
farming system, so that there is low income, more production cost,
low production and productivity. It results in direct negative impact,
effect in poverty alleviation.
- Though,
agriculture is inherent occupation of the district; there is no proper
upgrading in commercial farming system due to inadequate training,
literacy and interest.
- Traditional
division of cultivable land makes stratification (fragmented) and
scattered land, result in low production and productivity and high cost of
production.
- Quality
fertilizer supplied from Agriculture Input Corporation (AIC) is costly as
well as untimely available. So private fertilizer dealers are involved
supplying substandard fertilizer but there is no proper quality control
and monitoring.
- Most
of the farmers are continuously used saved seed from traditional crop
variety hence germination and physical purity will be low in resulting in
low production & productivity.
- There
are no adequate and proper credit facilities in pocket area, flow &
repayment of credit is also difficult due to conflict situation.
- Dependency
on agriculture is gradually decreasing from three decades. Tendency of new
generation & literate group are involved in agriculture only after no
alternate occupation, has made necessary for more effort to increase
production & productivity of agriculture. Besides possibility of
availability of agriculture manpower will be poor in future. So need to
focus in use of appropriate technology.
1.4. A brief on APPSP
The Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program (APPSP) is a five
year program supported by DFID and MOAC of Government of Nepal. The project
became effective from 24th
March 2003 .
APPSP has been established
to render support to the MOAC in the implementation of 20 years Agriculture
Perspective Plan (APP) which is the Government of Nepal's key multi-sector
policy document for agriculture and rural development. The APPSP focuses at
district and national implementation of Nepal's APP and expects to
contribute in reducing poverty and vulnerability, which is the main objective
of PRSP/10th Five Years Plan.
Super
Goal, Goal & Purpose of the APPSP are as follows:
Super Goal:
Livelihood
improvement of rural people.
Achievement of Agriculture livelihood outcomes desired by:
Ø
Poor, Women, disadvantaged caste and ethnic farmers group and
Ø
Poor who benefit indirectly from growth in the agriculture sector.
Goal:
Agricultural growth that benefits poor
producers, agricultural workers and consumers.
Purpose:
To deliver appropriate
agricultural support services to the rural poor through improved policy and
institutional arrangements.
Expected Outputs
Ø
Strengthened institutional capacity for pro-poor agriculture
policy design and delivery
Ø
Strengthened district level capacity to deliver agriculture
service which maximizes potential for equitable agriculture based livelihood
opportunities.
Ø
Outcome focused participatory monitoring and information system
linking local and national levels developed and deployed.
Ø
2. Inception of APPSP and DADF
2.1 Time
line showing Year when APPSP was initiated in the district; when DADF was
established; Proposal called proposals award etc. events to data in
chronological order
APPSP has started formally
in the district from July, 2004. Implementation of APPSP at the district level
basically refers to the establishment of District Agriculture Development Fund
(DADF) under DDC's District Development Fund (DDF) and to utilize this fund to
expand agriculture service delivery in the district through Service Providers
(S.Ps)
and Farmers Group (F.Gs).
The DADF intends to have quick and visible impact of the development
interventions undertaken by the government and mobilize public sector resources
for the benefits of disadvantaged farmers including women and those in remote
areas. It is expected that activities of APPSP would orient agricultural
services in the welfare of the target groups in which disadvantaged, marginal,
poor women farmers, dalits, ethnic minorities etc. are in priority. The program
also intends to increase the income of farming communities through enhancing
the quality of the agriculture service delivery for contributing towards
poverty reduction.
Table :5
Proposal called, proposals awarded and
number of DEF/LIF
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Date of Proposal
called
|
Date of Proposal
awarded
|
No.DEF projects
|
No. LIF projects
|
|
2061-62
|
2061/06/15
|
2061/10/08
|
4
|
13
|
|
Not called proposal but awareness has been
created informally.
|
2062/02
|
14
|
36
|
|
062-63
|
2062/06/09
|
15
|
48
|
|
2062/11/29
|
8
|
0
|
|
063-64
|
2063/07/19
|
18
|
137
|
|
064-65
|
2064/10/14
|
21
|
89
|
|
Total
|
|
|
80
|
322
|
First year proposal call
has been done in local paper and notice in public place. Beside this awareness
has been created through orientation with service providers and farmers groups
and also with stake holders for accessibility of P& E groups. One NGO has
also involved for LIF awareness creation. The received proposal of first year have evaluated in second year. In FY 2061/62 &
2062/63, twice proposals have been awarded.
For implementation of
APPSP activities in the district, the funds of Financial Assistance (F.A.)
allocated through APPSP to DADF in DDC under the following sub-heading:
a.
Fund for proposals under District Extension Fund (DEF)
b.
Fund for proposals under Local Initiative Fund (LIF)
c.
Policy Analysis Study
d.
Publication of Success stories/ Dissemination consultation
e.
Service Providers work shop
2.2 Proposal Received,
Qualified, Implemented & completed
As proposal receiving is an initial
& important for Program Implementation. Beginning from program
implementation in the district, proposals of DEF & LIF have been receiving
in DSU. For regular proposal receiving from each & every VDCs especially
from where proposals have not been reached at all, DSU have made effort by
convincing farmers, teachers, politicians, other line-agencies, NGOs, cooperatives,
local key persons, staffs by distributing leaflets, brochures & proposal formats. Even distribution of
proposal formats in local fair, keeping the model of proposal formats in local
town/markets for photo copy, so that rural people will get easily.
The
received proposals have been opened by Technical Sub-Committee (TSC) members by
doing signature on each and every proposal. As per the guide line preliminary screening was
done by DSU. Qualified proposals were submitted to TSC for evaluation. TSC
members were sat in round table & evaluated based on proposals screening
guideline of "DADF By –laws 2061 and first amendment 2063 ".
DEF proposals
obtaining 70% and above those financial proposals have been opened &
analyzed by TSC. After evaluation, projects have been recommended by DADC
meeting and the same have been approved by DDC meeting.
|
Table:6
|
|
|
Table showing
proposal received, qualified, evaluated, approved, contracted out &
completed.
|
|
|
Details
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Till
Date
|
|
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
|
|
Received
|
41
|
95
|
136
|
42
|
321
|
363
|
54
|
177
|
231
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
137
|
593
|
730
|
|
|
Qualified
|
21
|
61
|
82
|
31
|
133
|
164
|
20
|
148
|
168
|
35
|
127
|
162
|
107
|
469
|
576
|
|
|
Evaluated
|
21
|
61
|
82
|
31
|
133
|
164
|
20
|
148
|
168
|
25
|
127
|
152
|
97
|
469
|
566
|
|
|
Approved
|
18
|
49
|
67
|
24
|
100
|
124
|
18
|
138
|
156
|
21
|
89
|
110
|
81
|
376
|
457
|
|
|
Contracted Out
|
18
|
48
|
66
|
23
|
77
|
100
|
18
|
108
|
126
|
21
|
89
|
110
|
80
|
322
|
402
|
|
|
Completed
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
21
|
111
|
132
|
16
|
83
|
99
|
43
|
83
|
126
|
80
|
277
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A total of 137 DEF and 593 LIF proposal have
been received, among them 80 DEF and 322 LIF projects have been implemented in
various VDCs of the district. The maximum no. of proposal received in FY
2062/63 but no. of DEF proposal were
high in year2063/64 and LIF in year 2062/63.
More
no. projects have been contracted in year 2063/64. Contracted out of DEF
projects were more in year 2062/63 and more
LIF in 2063/64.
A
total of 357projects (DEF,LIF) have been completed till date, among those 80 of
DEF and 277 of LIF projects. The maximum DEF projects have been completed in
year 2064/65 and LIF were more in year 2062/63. There are 48 LIF project have
not been completed due to dispute in groups, lack of knowledge for settling, un
timely submission of bills and receipts and misuse of first installment.
2.3 VDCs Coverage
There are 77 VDCs & 1 municipality
in Kapilvastu. All VDCs have been classified in to 3 categories based on
accessibility, remoteness, facility availability like electricity, road,
market, communication etc. Those are priority 1st where less no. of
facility available, priority 2nd where moderately available and
priority 3rd where more facility available.
Looking in to project implementation
of APPSP projects by different service providers (S.Ps) and farmers groups (F.Gs).
A total of 74 VDCs (96%) have been covered till now. Among those 71 VDCs have
been covered by DEF projects only & 55 VDCs have been covered by LIF
projects only and others are mixed.
Table:7
Table showing the
project implemented in different VDC categories.
|
Description
|
Unit
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
No. of VDCs coverage
|
|
District
Head Quarter or along the roadside
|
No.
|
26
|
18
|
27
|
|
Surrounding
VDCs
|
No.
|
31
|
25
|
32
|
|
Remote
VDCs
|
No.
|
14
|
12
|
15
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
71
|
55
|
74 (96%)
|
Out of 74 VDCs. 27 VDCs from priority
1, 32VDCs from priority 2 and 15 VDCs from priority 3.
Till date only
74% VDCs of this district have been covered and Still 3 VDCs have remained to inter.
More no. of VDCs yet to be covered and intensified with program in constituency
area no.4 and 5 .All VDCs have been covered in constituency area no 1,.2 and 3.
Looking in to the wards coverage under
different VDCs by DEF & LIF projects. A total coverage of 631 wards,145,143 and 78 wards
under priority VDCs 1st ,2nd
and 3rd respectively by DEF projects. Like wise 55,161and 49 wards
under priority VDCs 1st ,2nd
and 3rd respectively by LIF projects. Remote
VDCs of the district and inaccessible ward & sreet tol yet to be covered.
3. Budget and expenditure
A total of NRs.48166 thousands had
been approved for expenditure of DADF project implementation, policy analysis,
SP workshop and dissemination & consultation including 5 % management cost.
But only Rs. 41812 (86.8%) amount of released, Rs. 39888 .5(95.4%) amount have
been expended for DADF project implementation. Balance is very nominal.
The maximum budget released in FY
2061/62,062/63 and 064/65 but expenditure
was higher during FY 2062/63 and 2063/64
which almost 100% of released budget. The balance was more in year 2061/62. In
FY 2064/65 balance has been found due to late awarding of project and few LIF
projects have not claimed bill and receipts of first installment. (Table :8)
Table :8
Total budget and expenditure (in Rs.
'000)
|
F.Y.
|
Allocated
|
Released
|
Expended
|
Balance
|
|
2061/62
|
8365
|
5113.8
|
3370.5
|
1743
|
|
2062/63
|
14469
|
11448
|
11435
|
13
|
|
2063/64
|
14508
|
14426
|
14424
|
1
|
|
2064/65
|
10824
|
10824
|
10659
|
165
|
|
Total
|
48166
|
41812
|
39888.5
|
1922.35
|
|
%
|
|
86.8
|
95.4
|
4.6
|
Under
DEF 86.92 % of the allotted fund has been released in the district but 94.61 %
of the released amount has been expended. The balance amount is little more (5.38%)due
to bulky amount has not been expended in FY 2061/62.
Table :9
DEF total budget and expenditure
(in Rs. '000)
|
DEF Projects
|
|
FY
|
Allocated
|
Released
to District
|
Expenditure
|
Balance
|
|
061/62
|
6195
|
3787
|
2506.55
|
1280.45
|
|
062/63
|
11970
|
9470.66
|
9103.2
|
367.46
|
|
063/64
|
10750
|
10750
|
10750
|
0
|
|
064/65
|
8585.44
|
8585.44
|
8479.44
|
106
|
|
Total
|
37500.44
|
32593.1
|
30839.19
|
1753.91
|
|
%
|
|
86.91
|
94.61
|
5.38
|
Under
LIF 86.48% of the allocated fund has been released in the district but 98.77%
of the released amount has been expended. Here balance amount is very small. Maximum
expenditure in projects was high in year 2062/63 and 2063/64. Excess amount
have been expeded in year 2062/63 due to allocated budget had not been received
in 3rd trimester, since that negative balance is showing. That
amount has been expended from DEF allocation. (Table 10)
Table :10
LIF total budget and expenditure
(in Rs. '000)
|
LIF Projects
|
|
FY
|
Allocated
|
Released
to District
|
Expenditure
|
Balance
|
|
061/62
|
2105
|
1286.78
|
799
|
487.78
|
|
062/63
|
2294
|
1815
|
2240.4
|
-425.4
|
|
063/64
|
3578.78
|
3578.78
|
3578.78
|
0
|
|
064/65
|
1621.36
|
1621.36
|
1580.97
|
40.39
|
|
Total
|
9599.14
|
8301.92
|
8199.15
|
102.77
|
|
%
|
|
86.48
|
98.77
|
1.22
|
4.
District Extension Fund (DEF)
Till date a
total of 80 projects have been implemented, among which 18 were in FY 2061/62,
23 were in 2062/63, 18 were in 2063/64 and 21 were in FY 2064/65. Among them
only project in FY 2062/63 had not completed successfully.
4.1 Beneficiaries Composition
For any program, kind of beneficiaries
is the most important to achieve the target. If beneficiaries will not be in
proportionate then there will be chance of failing of the program. Involvement
of the target group is more essential based on gender, socially and
economically, too.
4.1.1 Beneficiaries
based on Gender
A total of 578
farmers groups under DEF projects, among them 278 were of agriculture based,
140 were of live stock based and 160 were of mixed type.
Under
DEF projects, no. of beneficiaries was more in this F.Y.2063/64. The female participation was more (51.79%)
compared to male as target beneficiaries of program. The female participation was
high in year 2061/62 (69.23%) and 2063/64 (51.2%). (Table no.11)
Table No. 11
DEF beneficiaries
based on gender
|
Description
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Total
|
%
|
|
Female
|
No.
|
1618
|
1694
|
1918
|
1215
|
6445
|
51.79
|
|
Male
|
No.
|
719
|
1735
|
1828
|
1717
|
5999
|
48.21
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
2337
|
3429
|
3746
|
2932
|
12444
|
|
4.1.2 Beneficiaries based on Social Class
Out
of 12444 HH under DEF31.26% are dalit, 26.25% DND, 16.77% DJ, 0.47% AJ, 7.94%
RM and 17.31% BCT. More no. of dalits
HHs. were participated in year 2061/62 (36.45%) followed by 2064/65(36%)
and 2063/64 (27.12%). Like wise more no.
of DND were participated in year 2064/65 (36.8%) followed by 2063/64 and
2062/63. RM were more in year 2063/64 (12.81%) followed by 2061/62 (8.34%) and
2064/65.(Table 12)
Table :12
DEF
beneficiaries based on Social class.
|
Social
class
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Till date
|
%
|
|
Dalit
|
HH
|
852
|
966
|
1016
|
1056
|
3890
|
31.26
|
|
Disadvantaged
non-dalit
|
HH
|
248
|
699
|
1241
|
1079
|
3267
|
26.25
|
|
Disadvantaged
janjati
|
HH
|
563
|
762
|
417
|
345
|
2087
|
16.77
|
|
Advantaged
janjati
|
HH
|
0
|
17
|
41
|
0
|
58
|
0.47
|
|
Religious
Minorities
|
HH
|
195
|
106
|
480
|
207
|
988
|
7.94
|
|
BCT
|
HH
|
479
|
879
|
551
|
245
|
2154
|
17.31
|
|
Total
|
HH
|
2337
|
3429
|
3746
|
2932
|
12444
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1.3
Beneficiaries based
on Poverty.
Among
the total beneficiaries of DEF project, 10020(80.52%) were poor and remaining 19.47 %were non poor. Poor
beneficiaries were more in FY. 2063/64 followed by 064/65 and 2061/62.
(Table13)
Table No.13
DEF beneficiaries
based on poverty.
|
Description
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Till
date
|
%
|
|
Poor
|
No.
|
1403
|
2057
|
3746
|
2814
|
10020
|
80.520733
|
|
Non-poor
|
No.
|
934
|
1372
|
0
|
118
|
2424
|
19.479267
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
2337
|
3429
|
3746
|
2932
|
12444
|
100
|
5. Local Initiative Fund (LIF)
5.1 Beneficiaries Composition
5.1.1 Beneficiaries
based on Gender
A total of 322
farmers groups under LIF projects, among them 184 were of agriculture based, 84
were of live stock based and 54 were of mixed type.
Under
LIF projects, no. of beneficiaries was more in this F.Y.2063/64. The female participation was more (53.17%)
compared to male, as female are target beneficiaries of the program. The female
participation was high in year 2061/62 (69.23%) and 2063/64 (51.2%) compared to
FY2062/63 and. But in FY 2063/64 male participation was more than female.(Table
no.14)
Table :1 4
LIF beneficiaries
based on gender
|
Description
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Total
|
%
|
|
Female
|
No.
|
589
|
805
|
878
|
992
|
3264
|
53.17
|
|
Male
|
No.
|
367
|
701
|
1063
|
744
|
2875
|
46.83
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
956
|
1506
|
1941
|
1736
|
6139
|
|
5.1.2 LIF
Beneficiaries based on Social Class
Out
of 6139 HH under LIF 37.27% are dalit, 22.69% DND, 12.69% DJ, 0.05% AJ, 1052%
RM and 16.78% BCT. More no. of dalits HHs. were participated in year 2063/64
(41%). followed by 2064/65(37.15%), 2061/62 (36.61%) and Like wise more no. of DND were participated
in year 2064/65 (38.02%) followed by 2063/64(26.17%). RM were more in year
2061/62 (16%) followed by 2064/65(12.33%).(Table 15)
Table :15
LIF
beneficiaries based on Social class.
|
LIF social
class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social
class
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Till
date
|
%
|
|
Dalit
|
HH
|
350
|
490
|
803
|
645
|
2288
|
37.27
|
|
Disadvantaged
non-dalit
|
HH
|
64
|
161
|
508
|
660
|
1393
|
22.69
|
|
Disadvantaged
janjati
|
HH
|
242
|
221
|
205
|
111
|
779
|
12.69
|
|
Advantaged
janjati
|
HH
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
0.05
|
|
Religious
Minorities
|
HH
|
155
|
92
|
185
|
214
|
646
|
10.52
|
|
BCT
|
HH
|
145
|
542
|
237
|
106
|
1030
|
16.78
|
|
Total
|
HH
|
956
|
1506
|
1941
|
1736
|
6139
|
100
|
5.1.3
LIF Beneficiaries
based on Poverty.
Among
the total beneficiaries of LIF project, 5768(90.88%) were poor and remaining 9.11
%were non poor. Poor beneficiaries were more in FY. 2063/64 followed by 064/65
and 2061/62. (Table16)
Table No.16
DEF beneficiaries based on poverty.
|
Description
|
Unit
|
F.Y.061/62
|
F.Y.062/63
|
F.Y.063/64
|
F.Y.064/65
|
Till
date
|
%
|
|
Poor
|
No.
|
1047
|
1106
|
1921
|
1690
|
5764
|
90.88
|
|
Non-poor
|
No.
|
109
|
403
|
20
|
46
|
578
|
9.11
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
1156
|
1509
|
1941
|
1736
|
6342
|
100
|
6. Group type
The
farmers groups were involved for getting benefits were of agriculture based
than Live stock based and livestock and mixed type were same in number.(Table
17)
Table
No. 17
Group Types:
|
Group type
|
Unit
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
|
Agri. based
|
No
|
278
|
184
|
462
|
|
Livestock
|
No
|
140
|
84
|
224
|
|
Mixed
|
No
|
160
|
54
|
214
|
|
Total group
|
No
|
578
|
322
|
900
|
7 . Types of Project activities
As per the goal of the APPSP
livelihood improvement of rural farmers through agriculture growth. Different
projects of DEF & LIF have been proposed for different kinds of components
like skill development, capacity building, Income generating activities, market
promotion, irrigation support, chilling vat details of activities have been
illustrated in Table 18.
Among the total projects, more no. of
project is of vegetable production with small irrigation were 169; goat rearing
projects were 84; Vegetable production only were 34, fish farming were 23, tube well and pumpset were 19 irrigation were
13, TPS potato are 3; Each of Bee-keeping,
Pig rearing3, veg., goat & bee-keeping, Banana farming, Banana, goat &
poultry, veg., goat& irrigation, veg., goat& fish and veg., goat &
pig projects were 2 and Each of Cattle shed floor construction, veg., Market
shed construction & dairy chilling
vat are 1 in number.
Mixed types
of project were in DEF than LIF. Project of treadle pump were more due to more
affordable and manageable by small farmers and also Nepal SIMI had given more
emphasis in demand of treadle pump by facilitating in proposal writing.
Table No. 18
Table
showing type of projects implemented in F.Y. 061/62, 062/63 and 063/64.
|
S.N
|
Type
|
Unit
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Cattle
shed floor construction
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
2
|
Veg.&
Irrigation (Treadle pump, motor, pumpset)
|
No.
|
9
|
160
|
169
|
|
3
|
Veg.
Production
|
No.
|
1
|
33
|
34
|
|
4
|
Veg.,
Market shed construction
|
No.
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
5
|
Goat
Rearing
|
No.
|
13
|
71
|
84
|
|
6
|
Goat
& Pig Rearing
|
No.
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
7
|
Buffalo Rearing
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
8
|
Pig
Rearing
|
No.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
9
|
Fish
farming
|
No.
|
1
|
22
|
23
|
|
10
|
Fish
farming & Piggeries
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
11
|
Bee
Keeping
|
No.
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|
12
|
Irrigation
|
No.
|
0
|
13
|
13
|
|
13
|
Chilling
vat
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
14
|
Veg.,
Goat, Bee keeping
|
No.
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
15
|
TPS
Potato
|
No.
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
|
16
|
Banana
farming
|
No.
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
|
17
|
Banana,
Goat, Poultry
|
No.
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
18
|
Veg.,
goat, Irrigation
|
No.
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
|
19
|
Veg.,
goat
|
No.
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
|
20
|
Veg.,
Piggeries, Irrigation
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
21
|
Veg.,
goat, Irrigation, Fish
|
No.
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
22
|
Veg.,
Goat & Pig Rearing
|
No.
|
6
|
0
|
6
|
|
23
|
Veg.,
Goat, Poultry & Pig Rearing
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
24
|
Poultry
Farm
|
No.
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
|
25
|
Veg.
Seed Production
|
No.
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
26
|
Turmeric
|
No.
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
27
|
Check
Dam Construction
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
28
|
Veg.
production & Pig
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
29
|
Irrigation
& Goat
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
30
|
Goat
& Livestock and Bee-Keeping
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
31
|
Veg.
TPS, Goat Rearing
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
32
|
Market
Construction
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
33.
|
Tube
well and Pumpset
|
No.
|
19
|
0
|
19
|
|
34
|
Treadle
pump and Goat
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
35
|
Treadle
pump and Pigeon
|
No.
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
Total
|
No.
|
80
|
322
|
402
|
8. Types of Service Providers
DEF
project have been implemented by different kinds of service providers. A total
of 59 DEF projects, 36 are NGOs, 11 are cooperative, 8 are CBOs, Agri. Farmers
group & Agriculture Graduate are 3 and only one is agriculture service
centre.
Table 14
Table
showing type of Service Providers in F.Y. 061/62, 062/63 and 063/64.
|
S.N
|
Type
|
2061/62
|
2062/63
|
2063/64
|
2064/65
|
Total
|
|
1
|
CBOs
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
9
|
|
2
|
NGOs
|
11
|
15
|
12
|
14
|
52
|
|
3
|
Cooperative
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
15
|
|
4
|
Agriculture
Farmers Group
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
5
|
Agri.
graduate
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
1
|
|
6
|
Agriculture
Service
|
1
|
0
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Total
|
18
|
23
|
18
|
21
|
80
|
9.
Duration of the project
All the LIF projects duration is
similar i.e. for 6 months. And DEF projects duration is illustrated in table
no. 15.
Table no.15
Table
showing the duration of the implemented DEF projects.
|
S.
N.
|
Duration
in month
|
No.
of DEF projects
|
|
1
|
6
|
38
|
|
2
|
9
|
2
|
|
3
|
12
|
39
|
|
4
|
18
|
1
|
There
are, 39 DEF projects of one year, 38 projects of 6 month duration, 2 of 9
months and only one is of one and half year period. (Annexure 1)
10. DADF activities:
In
DEF projects, service providers (S.Ps) were mobilized farmers groups by participating
in monthly meeting, facilitating for their decision, assisting in collection of
service & its mobilization in credit and supporting in group strengthening.
Like wise in LIF projects, farmers groups also conduct social mobilization
activities themselves or sometime assisted by local NGOs volunteers.
a) Project Orientation
To make aware to
all stakeholders, beneficiaries, project orientation has been conducted by all
Service Providers before commencing the projects. In this event, project brief
(project name, area, beneficiaries and activities) financial description item
wise, calendar of operation, roles & responsibilities of BMC, contribution
of beneficiaries have been disscussed. The effect of this event was very
importance in iffective implementatioin of the project and
very good tool for transparency.
b)
Project Hoarding Board
For the purpose of transparency holding board
has been displayed in public place of target area. On which, project
description, financial summary, supporting organization name in visible
way. This was helped in publicity of
theproject and for better understandinf of the with civil society.
c) BMC Meeting
Soon after
agreement, awarded
Service Providers & DADO, 3 beneficiaries Monitoring Committee members had
been called in DSU & discussed in details on project, budget details , rate, contributions, BMC's
roles & responsibilities and
calendar of operation. One copy of contract paper & financial proposal
details have been given to them. This was very much helpful in better
utilization of resourses.
d) 
Skill
development activities
In DEF, for skill
development, there are different kinds of trainings like Nursery raising, crop
management, compost/FYM management, post harvest technology, market management,
IPM farmer's field school in rice etc. to support in production of vegetable,
banana rice & potato components, like wise shed management, field
management, health management, new born animal care, pregnant animal care &
management training have been proposed & conducting by different S.Ps and
F.Gs in case of goat & pig rearing activities. In case of bee keeping,
different types of 2-3 training, poultry management training.
DEF projects have
also been organized line agency & stockholder coordination meeting/ workshop
for promotion of market as well institutional development of the groups.
e) Income generating activities
Only training,
meeting, workshop, visit are not enough to improve the livelihood of poor &
excluded, there are various types of IGA components based on need of target
groups have been executed by different S.P & F.G since vegetable production
is very much suitable cultivation, consumption & market for small land
holding farmers, more no. of projects are of vegetable production type, goat rearing
and pig rearing is very much suitable for landless as well as very less/
problematic land holding farmers. Goat rearing activities are also more under
DEF & LIF. Especially, women are much like goat keeping component than
vegetable production. Handling & benefit sharing of goat is under control
of women is more.
There
are other various types of IGA like banana cultivating, bee-keeping, pig
rearing, buffalo rearing, fish farming.
11. Supporting Activities
- Irrigation Support
For cultivating agriculture
group irrigation is much more important to increase production as well
productivity. Only 29% of area of the district is under irrigation. In this
district, treadle pump is predominantly practiced by small holding farmers for
small irrigation. Like wise, to some extant electric motors, pump set, are also
purchased under DEF & LIF projects for lifting water from river, ponds and
lakes. Few sallow tube wells boring have been installed for irrigation purpose.
- Agri.-inputs &
implements support
For poor and traditional farmers, improved variety of seeds, material
of seasonal & off seasonal vegetable, potato (TPS), banana fodder, bee box
& bee colony with foundation colony, Honey exactor, bee Vail have been
supported. Like wise to increase judicious use of appropriate chemical
fertilizer & pesticides with necessary implements like sprayer tank, rose
gain, nursery material plastics. For livestock side, goat kids, piglets,
buffalo have been supported through DEF & LIF projects.
Market Support
It's said that market pulls the production & research pushes the
production. In the districting them are weekly markets are available in some
extant for selling & purchasing the problems & daily need materials
under DEF at 3 places (Chandrauta, Jaynagar & Odari) the program has
supported for construction of market shed and weights, balance and carets.
- Breed improvements
Traditional breed of
livestock have very low productivity & low income per unit cost of
production. Therefore need of high yield in improved breed for natural
production is highly important. This program has distributed
important. This program has distributed improved breed of buffalo bull buck (He
goat), male pig lets.
- Cattle shed improvement
-
Cattle urine has more nutrients than
cattle dung. Traditional types of cattle sheds are un-hygienic and losses of
nutrients are more. So that, it needs improve cattle floor for collection of
urine and cow dung. It also helps to reduce external and internal parasites of
cattle. Ultimately it helps to improve health of cattle and yield of milk.
Under DEF cattle shed floor has been made cemented and constructed urine tank
for collection of urine. Collected urine used for agricultural crops.
g. 
Chilling-vat installation
Under DEF Project, a better price of milk produced by rural
farmers, accessible place for milk producing farmers and transportation a
chilling-vat in under installation by a cooperative service provider.
Milking also has supported for easy & hygienic
collection of milk.
- Others Livestock supporting activities
APPSP projects have been supported
many activities like, tagging for easy
identification, drenching against internal parasites, dipping against external
parasites, vaccination against different bacterial, viral diseases for goat,
pig, poultry and cattle. Fodder production also has been supported by the
program through DEF/LIF projects.
12. Social
mobilization & technical backstopping
In all most all DEF project, social mobilizer technical
staff of agriculture or livestock have been recruited in daily ways or monthly
bases for supporting target group farmers. SPs use to mobilize the social
mobilizer (SM) in field in group meeting for saving & credit mobilization,
facilitating the meeting arranging the training and also convey the message
from SP to F.G and F.G. to SP.
Technical staff (JTA, I.Sc.Ag, B.Sc. Ag) of agriculture or
livestock depending on nature of project use to visit farmers home, field,
suggest for betterment of crop/livestock production. Try to solve the problem
encountered with crop or livestock. Staff also supporting in training, visit,
input distribution, demonstration & use of treadle pump, sprayer etc.
Agriculture technicians advise & recommend the farmers in the case of
insect pest occurrence in the crop and any problem to livestock.
13. Public Audit
From
this F.Y. public audit have been carried out in each and every DEF projects for
the purpose of making good governance/transparency, increasing community
ownership and awareness to civil society and other people. Till now 1o DEF
project's service providers have been completed accordingly (Table No. 16)
. In this event BMC members, beneficiaries, Local Political parties member,
ASC/LSSC representative, Civil societies, DSU member and local& district
line agencies.
Table:16
Table showing Service
providers carried out Public Audit
|
S.N.
|
Service
providers Name
|
Address
|
Remarks
|
|
1
|
Ravi Samudaik Swasthya Kendra
|
Dhankauli
|
|
|
2
|
Adarsh
Manav Utthan Sanstha
|
Haranampur
|
|
|
3
|
Gramin
Garivi Niwaran Kendra
|
Dumara
|
|
|
4
|
Krishi
Bahuuddhyasiya Co. Ltd. Sanstha
|
Motipur
|
|
|
5
|
Lumibini
Community Org.
|
Pakadi
|
|
|
6
|
Srawangin
Bikash Ka Lagi Parwartan Nepal
|
Banganga
|
|
|
7
|
Banganga Dugdha Co.
Org. Ltd.
|
Motipur
|
|
|
8
|
Indreni
Rural Development Centre
|
Jaynagar
|
|
|
9
|
Patariya
Community Learning Centre
|
Patariya
|
|
|
10
|
Jansewa
Social Centre
|
Parshoiya
|
|
|
11
|
Laxmanghat
Swabhalamban Co. Org. Ltd.
|
Bishunpur
|
|
|
12
|
Rajendramani
Pathak
|
Somdih
|
|
|
13
|
Dalit
Samajik Bikash Kendra
|
Niglihawa
|
|
|
14
|
Namuna
Farmars Grup
|
Hathausa- 8
|
|
|
15
|
Sarad Samaj
Kapilvastu
|
Shivapur
-6
|
|
|
16
|
Dalit
Utthan Samaj Nepal
|
Niglihawa
-3
|
|
|
17
|
Small
Farmars Coaperative Org.
|
Bhalawad 2
|
|
|
18
|
Indrini
Gramin Dev. Centre
|
Jayanagar
|
|
|
19
|
Janakalan
Sanstha
|
Patariya- 6
|
|
|
20
|
Annapurna Samajik Service Centre
|
Kapilvastu
-9
|
|
|
21
|
Samajia
Jagaran & Dev.Sanstha
|
Banganga -7
|
|
|
22
|
Janachetana
Community Organization
|
Dohani -4
|
|
|
23
|
Shidhartha
Saving & Credit Cooperative Ltd.
|
Gajehada-7
|
|
|
24
|
Gramin
Garivi Niwaran Kendra
|
Dumara-7
|
|
|
25
|
Kapilvastu
Intergraded Development Services-KIDS Project
|
KV
municipality 2
|
|
|
26
|
Amardeep
Social Development Centre
|
Mahendrakot-7
|
|
|
27
|
Bishwadristi
Org. Vision
|
Baluhawa-2
|
|
|
28
|
Rahul
Social Development Centre
|
Pipara
1-9
|
|
|
29
|
Shiwam
Multi Purpose Social Centre
|
Lalpur-5
|
|
|
30
|
Yams
Social Development Centre
|
Bijuwa
1
|
|
|
31
|
Lumbini
Social Service Centre
|
jaynagar,
|
|
|
32
|
Kapilvastu
Saving & Credit Cooperative Org.
|
Kapilvastu
minicipality
|
|
|
33
|
Jankalyan
Multi Purpose Cooperative Organization Ltd.
|
Sihokhor-6
|
|
|
34
|
Kalika
Self-Reliance Service Centre-KSSC
Nepal
|
KV
Nagarpalika
|
|
|
35
|
Mahalaxmi
Self-Reliance Saving & Credit Cooperative Ltd.
|
Ganeshpur 1
|
|
|
36
|
Sisawa
Community Health Centre
|
Sisawa-2
|
|
|
37
|
Siddhartha
Market Management Committee
|
Gajehada –
7
|
|
|
38
|
Buddha
Gramin Bikash Tatha Sarasafai Sanstha
|
Labani
|
|
|
39
|
Samaj Kalyan M.P.Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.
|
Sauraha
|
|
|
40
|
Fulika
Community Learning Centre
|
Fulika
|
|
|
41
|
Jankalyan
Sanstha
|
Patariya
|
|
|
42
|
Samajik
Sarokar Kendra
|
Hariharpur
|
|
|
43
|
Ganesh Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.
|
Kapilvastu Municipality
|
|
|
44
|
Adarsh
Manav Utthan Kendra
|
Haranampur
|
|
|
45
|
Dalit
Samajik Bikash Kendra
|
Gotihawa
|
|
|
46
|
Bindabashini Manav Utthan Swastha Prajanan Kendra
|
Baluhawa
|
|
|
47
|
Dalit
Janjagaran Sewa Sangha
|
Jaynagar
|
|
|
48
|
Samaj Kalyan M.P.Sewa Kendra
|
Titirkhi
|
|
|
49
|
Srwangin
Bikash Kendra
|
Sihkhor
|
|
|
50
|
Lumbini
Samudaik Sangha
|
Pakadi
|
|
|
51
|
Laligurash
Krishi Sahakari Sangha
|
Dubiya
|
|
|
52
|
Samudak
Pariwar Bikash Kendra
|
Kapilvastu Municipality
|
|
|
53
|
Kapilvastu
Intrigrated Development Services-KIDS Project
|
Kapilvastu Municipality
|
|
|
54
|
Janaki Krisak Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.
|
Maharajgunj
|
|
|
55
|
Annapurna Samajik Sewa Kendra
|
Jawabhari
|
|
|
56
|
Jankalyan
Samajik Sanstha
|
Dohani
|
|
|
57
|
Lumbini
Akikrit Bikash Sanstha
|
Manpur
|
|
|
58
|
Yuwa Samaj Nepal
|
Lalpur
|
|
|
59
|
Lumbini
Akikrit Bikash Sanstha
|
Manpur
|
|
14.
Program supporting activity by DSU
- In year 2061-62,
familiarization with the district and line agencies .
- orientation on APPSP
to DADO staff and livestock staff.
- Orientation on APPSP
to district line agencies.
- Orientation to
district service Providers
- Orientation to group
farmers
- Preparation of DADF
bylaws and approval through DDC.
- Preparation of DADF
guide lines and approval through DDC.
- Proposal call in
local news paper and awareness.
- Proposal submission
, processing and award to approved proposal.
- LIF awareness though
NGO.
- In F.Y 2062/63, a
new DPA has been arrived in this district and became familiar with all the
program of F.Y.2061/62 and with all the officials by visiting & meeting.
- Going through all
the documents DSU feel to add and improve some kind's o formats for easy
submission of proposals, contract out, installment release, report
submission etc. DSU has also prepared and approved financial norms (rate
list) of different inputs and service cost for formality of the projects.
- DSU
has facilitated and advised to submission of proposal to NGOs,
Cooperatives, FGs, CBOs, committees etc. Also, made focus on VDCs where
proposals have not been received or projects have been not implemented
till now by convincing & distributing leaflets, pamphlets &
proposal's formats.
DSU has facilitated UK/DFID visit team in
Kapilvastu for interaction with DADO, DLSO, DDC staffs and also for
interaction with farmers of Dhankauli (DEF project of Sunshine Social
Development Center) & Niglihawa (LIF project of Laxmi Vegetable
production Group).
DSU has oriented about APPSP & its system
to new SADO, LDO CDO and DPC for easy & smooth running of program in
the district.- DSU has participated
many meetings, workshops, visits in the district, conducted by line
agencies, service providers, farmers groups and other program also
participated staff meeting of DADO & DLSO, Women Co-operatives meeting
of WDO.
DSU has taken part on RMO training in
Nepalgunj conducted by Risk Management Office, officer's level training
& Visit conducted by Nepal SIMI.
·
During
F.Y.2062/63, 5 times TSC meetings have been organized for proposals opening,
evaluation & recommendation. During proposal evaluation all the members of
TSC have been actively participated for proposal marking & evaluation as
well as discussion was made for proposal evaluation criteria. They have
suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria. They
have to suggested to revisit to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria.
- DSU
has organized & participated 3 times of LFP/APPSP coordination meeting
for making linkage between two DFID projects in the district. Both
programs have made common consideration & commitment for going
together in the community with different components.
- DSU
has participated in monitoring of the different types of DEF and LIF
implemented projects with Technical Monitoring Committee.
- DSU
has facilitated to Monitoring & Evaluation Specialist visit and
APPSP/CSU visit team (Program Manager & Program Advisor &
decentralized service delivery Specialist) in the district.
- DSU
has facilitated to SAGA team by assisting in interaction with S.P & farmers
groups in the program implemented area, also, helped for collecting data
from different line agencies, stakeholders.
- DSU has conducted
orientation and signature verification to BMC members for respective proposals
submitted with the help of RLSO & SADO. Roles and responsibility of
BMC has also been made aware and citizenship of BMC has been collected
during orientation.
- DSU has made
practices to all progress for displaying budget details board, orientation
regarding project before project execution & public audit at the end
of project for the purpose of transparency.
- DSU
has also assisted visit team of Western Regional Agriculture Directorate, Phokhara
12 districts SADOs visit, Department of Agriculture (DOA) & MOAC and
also visit from other district.
-
- Going through all
the documents DSU feel to add and improve some kinds of formats for easy
submission of proposals, contract out, installment release, report
submission etc. DSU has also revisited and approved financial norms (rate
list) of different inputs and service cost for formality of the projects.
- DSU
has facilitated and advised to submission of proposal to NGOs,
Cooperatives, FGs, CBOs, committees etc. Also, made focus on VDCs where
proposals have not been received or projects have been not implemented
till now by convincing & distributing leaflets, pamphlets &
proposal's formats.
DSU has facilitated MTR visit team in
Kapilvastu for interaction with DADO, LSO, DDC staffs and also for
interaction with farmers of Banganga, Motipur, Gajehada, Hathousa (DEF
project of Siddrtha saving & Credit Mobilization Co. Ltd., Srwangin
Bikash ka lagi Pariwartan Nepal, Banganga Dairy Cooperative Org. Ltd, Namuna Krisak
Samuh, Samajik Jagaran Bikash Sanstha etc.)
& Niglihawa,
Kapilvastu-9 (LIF project of Jagaran ,Jyoti
& Laligurash Women Farmer Group , Laxmi Vegetable
production Group, Himali Women Fish Farming Group etc.).- DSU has oriented about APPSP & its system
to new SADO, LDO and CDO for easy & smooth running of program in the
district.
- DSU has participated
many meetings, workshops, visits in the district, conducted by groups and
other program also participated staff meeting of DADO & DLSO, Women
Co-operatives meeting of WDO.
- DSU has taken part
on cluster meeting in Bhairahawa conducted by RSU Office.
- DSU has participated
in Officer's level training & Visit conducted by Nepal SIMI.
·
During F.Y.2063/64, 7 times TSC meetings have
been organized for proposals opening, evaluation & recommendation. During
proposal evaluation all the members of TSC have been actively participated for
proposal marking & evaluation as well as discussion was made for proposal
evaluation criteria. They have suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark of
proposal scoring criteria. They have suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark
of proposal scoring criteria.
·
During this F.Y 2063/64, 3 times DADC meetings have been organized
for screened project proposal recommendation, and addition of project duration
of not completed DEF projects in their time.
During this F.Y 2063/64, 3 times
DDC board meetings have project recommended by DADC. First time, 19 DEF
& 160 LIF projects have been approved but one DEF and 53 LIF project
has not been contract out due to lack of FA fund. - DSU has prepared and
approved the first revised DADF By-laws 2063 and DADF working
guideline 2064 from DDC meeting, containing APPSP district, Criteria of
proposal screening, evaluation & approval, proposal formats of DEF
& LIF, M & E tools, Roles & responsibilities of BMC, TMC, DMC,
TSC, DADC & DDC, important documents for project agreement, project
implementation guideline (like : holding board, Training, Distribution of
seed, Treadle Pump, goat, hegoat etc.), office documentation, , Important
document for advance releasing, Insurance policy of Livestock, Public
audit etc.
- DSU
has organized & participated 3 times of LFP/APPSP coordination meeting
for making linkage between two DFID projects in the district. Both
programs have made common consideration & commitment for going together
in the community with different components.
DSU has organized the social
mobilization training (Trainer were
RLSO, SADO, DPC, DPA & Planning Officer) & publication of social
mobilization booklet whish was opening by LDO. - DSU
has participated in monitoring of the different types of DEF and LIF
implemented projects with Technical Monitoring Committee.
DSU has facilitated to RD, DOA,
MOAC, DG and APPSP/CSU visit team (Program Manager & Program Advisor
& decentralized service delivery Specialist) in the district.
- DSU has conducted
orientation and signature verification to BMC members for respective
proposals. Roles and responsibility of BMC has also been made aware and
citizenship of BMC has been collected during orientation.
- DSU has made
practices to all progress for displaying budget details board, orientation
regarding project before project execution & public audit at the end
of project for the purpose of
transparency.
- In year 2064-65, Support in video
documentaries preparation by CSU.
- Facilitation in Value Chain Approach
Training conducted by Nepal SIMI/APPSP.
- Participation in
cluster meeting in Butwal.
- Participation in LLW
TOT in Salyan
- Conduction of LLW in
different location and level.
- Participation and
facilitatiuon of SED training to SPs and DADC members.
15.
Service provider's coordination meeting/ workshop
In F.Y.2062/63, 3 times, in F.Y.2063/64, 4 times and in F.Y.2064/65, 3 times, Service provider's coordination meetings have
been done from DSU support and 1 time workshop has been conducted from DADO
(according to FA subheading part) for collecting progress report, review of
progress, to make aware about different formats, effective to program monitor & sharing of knowledge
and experiences among SPs and line agencies and also giving feedback for
weaknesses, to know about problems and solutions.
The workshop was
conducted systematically in four sessions. In morning two sessions, objective
of workshop, status of APPSP in district, progress achieved by implementing has
SPs during the period. Total participants were 126 (CDO, LDO, Parties, Line agencies, Pm,
RLSOs, DADC members, Donor agencies)
Afternoon session was mainly focused
on group discussion on three different topics.
During the workshop Program Manager,
LDO, CDO, RLSOs, SADO, journalists and eight parties political representatives
have been given emphasis on effective and output oriented program
implementation honestly, transparently, accountability for poor and excluded
communities.
Table:17
Table showing activities which have been done by DSU
16.Activities performed
through out Fiscal Year 2061-62 to 064-65
FY 2061/62
|
S. N.
|
Date
|
Activities
|
Details/Major
decision
|
Remarks
|
|
1
|
9-10 Sep.2004
|
Organization of
district stake holder familiarization visit & D.H.Q based DADO staff introductory
meeting
|
district stake holder familiarization visit
to DDC, CDO, DLSO, DFO, Cop distributed brochure .
|
|
|
2
|
14 Sep 04
|
Collection of name
list SP
|
Collected name list
of NGO, Coop in the district.
|
|
|
3
|
3 Oct 2004
|
APPSP orientation
workshop to ex local authorities, social worker, journalist, political
parties
|
One day APPSP
orientation workshop to explain procedure of
APPSP to local
authorities, social worker, journalist, political parties
|
|
|
4
|
5,6 Oct 2004
|
APPSP orientation
workshop to FG, SP
|
One day APPSP
orientation workshop to explain procedure of
APPSP to SP, FG.
|
|
|
5
|
18,22 Sep 2004
|
DADC orientation
|
One day APPSP
orientation workshop to explain procedure of
APPSP to DADC
members
|
|
|
6
|
4 Oct 2004
|
DLSO staffs
orientation
|
One day APPSP
orientation workshop to explain procedure of
APPSP to DLSO staff
|
|
|
7
|
2061/6/15
|
Proposal Called
|
LIF DEF proposal
called in local paper and public place.
|
|
|
8
|
2061/10/8
|
DEF LIF Awarded
|
LIF DEF project
approved by DADC
|
|
|
9
|
2062/2/9
|
DEF LIF Awarded
|
LIF DEF project
approved by DADC
|
|
|
10
|
2062/3/12,13
|
SP workshop
|
Review of progress
of DEF project
|
|
|
FY 2062/63
|
|
|
11
|
062/5/6
|
TSC Member /RLSO
|
Opening of received proposals
|
|
|
12
|
062/5/28
|
TSC Member
|
Discussion on prelimenary screening Returning
of disqualified proposal
Priority to season suitable project Financial
norms
|
|
|
13
|
062/5/29
|
TSC Member
|
Proposal evaluation
|
|
|
14
|
062/5/30
|
TSC Member
|
Proposal evaluation
|
|
|
15
|
062/6/2
|
TSC Member
|
Proposal evaluation
|
|
|
16
|
062/6/3
|
TSC Member
|
Proposal evaluation
|
|
|
|
062/6/5
|
TSC Member
|
Opening of financial proposal os 70% above scored S.Ps.
|
|
|
12
|
062/6/16
|
TSC Member
|
Retuning of failed proposals (less than min. score) 15 DEF
& 100 LIF proposal recommendation
|
|
|
13
|
062/6/19
|
DADC Member
|
15 DEF & 100 LIF recommended for project implemented
monitors, reporting, expaces according to financial norms.
|
|
|
14
|
062/10/3
|
TSC Member
|
BMC members of DEFproposal
to be called for singnature verification & information about
program.
|
|
|
15
|
062/10/27
|
TSC Member
|
Proposal evaluation & 9 are proposal to
recommendation.
|
|
|
16
|
062/11/17
|
TSC Member
|
9 DEF proposal's project profile asked
Punishment to whom, has not worked properly by back listing in local
paper.
|
|
|
17
|
062/11/18
|
DADC Member
|
Member of TSC Ms. Shanti Devi Chamar has selected
|
|
|
18
|
063/3/1
|
DADC Member
|
Notice for timely advance settlement to DEF & LIF
implemented project of 061/62 & 062/63.
Repairing of not working
Treadle pump Authority
for project recommendation
Conduction of poly analysis workshop by the end of this F.Y.(25th
Asadh 2063) Coverage
of VDC where project has not been implemented till now by awareness program
through DADO (Hording board, Lond span, Pumphalet)
|
|
|
19
|
063/3/21
|
TSC Member
|
S.P coordination meeting
for creative suggestion
Opening of DEF & LIF proposals
|
|
|
20
|
063/3/31
|
TSC Member
|
Opening of DEF/LIF proposal
in this F.Y.02062/63
|
|
FY 2063/64
|
S. N.
|
Date
|
Activities
|
Details/Major
decision
|
Remarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
2063.06.07
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
v LIF proposal opening/given to DSU
for preliminary screening.
v Recommended male (Mr.Chaturbhuji
mani Tripathy) and female (Minu Shreshtha) farmers representative for Technical
Sub Committee.
v Forwarded to DADC the last year
approved LIF projects for agreement after field verification so as to not
duplicate.
v Give priority and emphasis on
permanent items like chilling vat, market shed, shallow boring, resource
centre establishment, seed production, biogas etc.
v DSU presented the 20qualified out of
25 DEF proposals and decided to return disqualified proposals to the
concerned SP.
v No submission/ registration of
proposals till ongoing DADF projects will complete.
v During new project recommendation,
it should not repeat the ward from existing DEF/LIF projects.
v Next meeting on 2063.06.08 in DDC hall.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
2063.06.08
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
·
Twenty
DEF proposals were evaluated and scores were listed (18 were crossed more than
70%).
(The
highest 79.5%ofSiswasosial centre &lowest 65.5%of Adarsh co-Operative
Ltd.)
Decided to
open the financial proposals of across 70% DEF proposals in next meeting.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
2063.06.09
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
· Opened the financial proposals of
more than 70% DEF.
· Given to DSU for preparation of
financial details.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
2063.06.28
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
· Discussion made on details prepared
by DSU.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
2063.06.29
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
· Evaluated LIF proposals.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
2063.06.30
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
· Evaluated LIF proposals.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
2063.06.29
|
TSC meeting
(nine
members present)
|
· Eighteen DEF and 137 LIF projects
were recommended to DADC.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
2063.07.01
|
DADC
meeting
(Eighteen
members present)
|
· Increased the duration up to Mansir 2063 of
incomplete LIF & DEF projects of last year due to many reasons.
· Remaining installments will be given
to last year DEF and LIF projects according to monitoring report.
· Decided to agreement last year 1 DEF
&23 LIF projects from this year amount.
· Decided to convert the fishery
activities of Mukti Social Devt.Centre, Dharampania due to duplication with
LFP in to Boring and pumpset in Fulika-6.
· Recommended eighteen DEF and 137 LIF
projects to DDC but condition was not to repeat the beneficiaries of new or
old projects.
· Priorities should be given
percentage of obtained score and season wise crop.
· Discussion made on the draft first
revised DADF By-laws 2063 to DDC for endorsement.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
2063.10. 14
|
DADC
meeting
(Eighteen
members present)
|
· Recommended the first revised DADF
By-laws 2063 to DDC for endorsement.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
2064.02. 16
|
DADC
meeting
(Twenty
members present)
|
· Recommended the DADF working guide
line 2064 according to first revised DADF bylaws 2063 to DDC for endorsement.
· Increased the duration up to
Asadh15th, 2064 of agreement time lapsed of LIF & DEF projects of last
and this F.Y. if there is a genuine reason.
· Decision made that service providers
who don't complete in time and improper implementation of project will
be firstly warned , secondly name
published in local paper and thirdly in national paper. Also, sp. who worked properly and effectively
will be awarded and published in national paper.
· Others related to DADO.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
2063.07.01
|
DDC board
meeting
|
· Approved 18+1 DEF and 137+23LIF
projects
|
|
|
|
12
|
2063.10.28
|
DDC board
meeting
|
· Endorsed the first revised DADF
Bylaws 2063.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
2064.03.25
|
DDC board
meeting
|
· Endorsed the DADF working guideline
2064.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
S.N.
|
Date
|
Activities
|
Details/Major decision
|
|
1.
|
2063.05.18
|
SP Coordination
meeting
18 members
participant
|
v 14 SPs presented their progress report,
output, issues &
recommendations.
v Decided to
participate chairperson/ secretary/ treasurer necessarily & present their
progress report in news print & submit their report to concern unit.
v Decided to conduct
next meeting in DADO meeting hall on 22nd Kartik 2063 and
organized by Gautam Buddha Yuva Kalb & awarded to Sarad Samaj Nepal
for exllent presentation in last meeting.
v Decided to
organized one day audit account training for financial capacity increase in
leadership of Gautam Buddha Yuva Club in DADO meeting hall and date will be
finalized later on.
|
|
2.
|
2063.07.22
|
SP Coordination
meeting
18 members
participant
|
· 15 SPs presented their progress report,
output, issues & recommendations.
· Decided to participate chairperson/
secretary necessarily & present their progress report in news print &
submit their report to concern unit and next meeting will hold in 20th
Poush 2063.
· Committed regular collection of authentic
data after implementing their activity and recommend the appropriate
suggestion.
· Account management training will be held
on frist Saturday of Mangsir 2063.
· Awarded to Sidartha Saving & Credit
Cooperative Ltd. Gajehada.
|
|
3.
|
2063.07.23
|
SP Coordination
meeting
23 members
participant
|
· New 18 SPs were oriented regarding process
of agreement & DEF project implementation.
· Required format distribute as soon as
possible.
|
|
4.
|
2063.09.20
|
SP Coordination
meeting
34 members
participant
|
· 30 SPs presented their progress report,
output, issues & recommendations.
· Awarded to Indreni Rular Development
Centre, Jaynagar.
· Decided to next meeting on 10th Falgun
2063.
· Continuous two times absent in SPs
coordination meeting will be noticed in DDC and DAO with later.
· Formation of coordination committee of
APPSP's SPs.
· Decided to conduct on get together party
on 29th Poush 2063 in Butwal
Lake site coordinated
by Madhav Parajuli and assisted by Krish Poudel, Sharma & Dubedi.
· Decided to one day social mobilization
training for capacity build up SPs social mobilizer on 6th Magh
2063.
|
|
5.
|
2064.02.21
|
SPs Workshop
meeting 126
participant (CDO,
LDO,
Parties, Line
agencies, Pm,
RLSOs, DADC
members,
Donor agencies
|
· Decided to necessarily participate
agreement holders of SPs in next workshop, meeting office contact otherwise
no submission of document and financial work will be done.
· Decided to last date of documents, bill
& receipt for settlement up to 15th Asadh 2064 otherwise
dismiss of their agreement.
|
|
FY2064/65
|
|
1
|
2064/5/20
|
TSC meeting
|
· Discussion on DEF
LIF proposal Submitted to DSU
|
|
2
|
2064/6/15
|
TSC meeting
|
· Proposal Opening
|
|
3
|
2064/6/16
|
TSC meeting
|
· Proposal Opening
|
|
4
|
2064/6/17
|
TSC meeting
|
· Proposal Opening
|
|
5
|
2064/6/24
|
TSC Meeting
|
· Criteria Developed
& preliminary screening
|
|
6
|
2064/6/25
|
TSC Meeting
|
· Evaluation
|
|
7
|
2064/6/26
|
TSC Meeting
|
· Evaluation
|
|
8
|
2064/6/28
|
TSC Meeting
|
· Evaluation
|
|
9
|
2064/6/29
|
TSC Meeting
|
· Evaluation
|
|
10
|
2064/7/22
|
DADC meeting
|
· Discussion on based
on new bylaws and guideline
|
|
11
|
2064/7/21
|
GIS orientation
|
· DADC members from
MOAC
|
|
12
|
2064/8/18
|
DADC meeting
|
· Discussion on deadlock of DADF project
|
|
13
|
2064/8/19
|
DADC meeting
|
· Discussion on
deadlock of DADF project
|
|
14
|
2064/10/11
|
DADC meeting
|
· Clearance on
deadlock of DADF project
|
|
15
|
2065/3/11
|
DADC meeting
|
· DADF closing letter
aware to DADC.
|
|
16
|
2064/4/29
|
Opening of APPSP a
Glance 2064, Modern Ag. Tech. & Video Doc.
|
· Show, distribution at
the presence of PM, CDO, LDO, RLSO & other 50 DADC participants
|
|
17
|
2064/5/20
|
SP workshop
|
· Review of progress
by SP's under DEF
|
|
18
|
2064/5/24
|
Interaction on
effect on youth due to conflict situation
|
· Manoj Sharma &
Arpita Nepal from DFID facilitated
|
|
19
|
2064/4/9-13
|
VCA training
|
· Conducted by Nepal
Simi & APPSP to DADC member & Sps
|
|
20
|
2064/11/2
|
SP orientation
|
· New awarded SPs
oriented on Rules and regulations of DADF
|
|
21
|
2064/11/20,21,24,30
|
BMC meeting
|
· Seven SPs BMC
Oriented
|
|
22
|
2064/11/22
|
Carrey over SPs
Orientation
|
· Old SPs were
oriented to complete timely
|
|
23
|
2064/11/24,26,30,
|
BMC meeting
|
· 13 SP's BMC
oriented in detail
|
|
24
|
2064/12/12,17,18,
|
BMC meeting
|
· 4 SP's BMC oriented
in detail
|
|
25
|
2065/1/22,2/14,20,21,23,26,27,28,
|
BMC meeting
|
· 15 SP's & GF
BMC oriented in detail
|
|
26
|
2065/2/30
|
SP WORKSHOP
|
· Review of SP
Progress under DEF
|
|
27
|
2065/3/5,8
|
BMC meeting
|
· 4 GF BMC oriented
in detail
|
|
28
|
2065/4/21
|
DMC meeting
|
· Review of DADF till
Date
|
|
29
|
2065/5/9,10
|
SED training
|
· DADC, political
parties, & SPs facilitated by Mrs. S Khadka & Mr. R Bista.
|
|
30
|
2065/4/22,23,27
|
LLW of DEF
beneficiaries
|
· LLW at Pakadi, Maharajgung &
Kopawa.
|
|
31
|
2065/4/24,28,29,
|
LLW of LIF
beneficiaries
|
· LLW at Gotihawa, BuddhiBahadurgung.
|
|
32
|
2065/4/30,31
|
LLW of SP
beneficiaries
|
· LLW at Jayanagar & Taulihawa
|
|
33
|
2065/5/10
|
LLW of DADC
beneficiaries
|
· LLW of DADC at Taulihawa facilited by RLSO,
& supervised by PB Shakya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
Project Monitoring
Monitoring is the most essential for
any program to make effective as well as qualitative. Though sufficient no. of
monitoring has not been done for all the project. But name of projects
installment has been released with out monitoring.
Projects have been monitored by
Technical Monitoring Committee (TMC) comprising of Senior Agriculture
Development Officer (SADO), District Livestock Development Officer (DLSO),
District program Coordinator (DPC), District Program Advisor (DPA) and also
with subject matter specialist (SMS), Journalist (Annapurna Post, Lumbini),
Local Development Officer (LDO), Administrative Officer of CDO, NGO Fed.
Representative, sometimes JT/JTA, monitoring have been usually done after
submission of bills & receipts by S.Ps & F.Gs
During program monitoring,
beneficiaries, member of beneficiaries and other person of the community. TMC
used to meet with and ask about the project implementation, Group mobilization,
saving & credit situation, Trainings, quality input support, irrigation
support, staff mobilization, support from technical staff, project activities
etc. Even quantity of input, depth of Treadle Pump, boring, weight of goat,
pig, seeds, fertilizer, pesticides, sprayer tank, bee hives, colors, fish
production, market stator etc. will be asked during field monitoring.
If there will be any different from
project agreement to service delivery then TMC try to suggest S.P.& F.G to
current the project implementation method & also try to inform to
beneficiaries about type quantity & quality of material & service to be
provided by S.P.& F.G.
TMC has also assist in back stopping
about technical problem faced by farmers. (Suggestions about insect pesticides,
diseased, weeds, irrigation, need, earthly up for crop, shed management,
feeding system driveling, dipping, discerns etc. for live stock)
Some times depute/conflict between S.P
& beneficiaries among group member will be settled by TMC in the present to
local representative will society & others. (Table No. 20)
|
Table
: 21
|
|
|
|
|
Table showing the No. of project monitored up to
F.Y.2063/64.
|
|
Type
|
DEF
|
LIF
|
Total
|
|
District Head Quarter or along the roadside
|
28
|
62
|
90
|
|
Surrounding VDCs
|
52
|
110
|
162
|
|
Remote VDCs
|
61
|
149
|
210
|
|
Total
|
141
|
321
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Observations
found & measures taken from field monitoring
A. Inferior & less quality of
Agriculture input distribution:
This case was observed by technical monitoring team (SADO, DPA) visited
on 14th feb.2006 in Jan Chetana Samudayik Sanstha, Dohani. The S.P.
has distributed less-viable vegetable seed of bitter gourd, cucumber &
pumpkin. That quantity was also less. That should be equal to amount of Rs.200
each member. At the time of monitoring these type of information has been
colleted & verified with submitted bills & receipts. The S.P has been
asked & deducted the exceed amount.. Again, It has been made to distribute
rail Quantity & Quantity of seed to targeted groups.
Like wise, Jan chetan Samudaik Sanstha, Dohani, Gramin Garivi Niwaran,
Dumara, Rahul Social Service Centre, Pipara have distributed inferior &
less quality of goats also in un appropriate time, was observed by TMC. Those
were corrected and Jan Chetan Samudaik Sanstha has been punished by warning
letter & published in local newspaper.
TMC was observed distribution of low quality and less population of bee
colony, hive, & medicine in CFID, Banganga which have been made correction.
Like wise CLC, Patariya, Mukti Samajik Bikash Sanstha,IRDC, Jaynagar, Jansewa
Samajik Kendra, Parsoiya, SICO, Kopawa, Ravi Samudaik Swasthay Kendra,
Dhankauli, Shivam SAmajik Kendra, Lalpur have been made correction of their
defaults.
Many cases in office management like displaying of office board, regular
meeting of executive bodies with necessary decision (budget), ledger
maintaining etc have been made improvement.
Distribution of low qualities inputs are also found in Field monitoring
in LIF projects which were improved by suggesting, repurchasing, giving load of
additional activities.
B. Installment released but project was not initiated:
This case was observed by technical
monitoring team (SADO, FDO, RLSO, DPC, DPC & Journalist) visited on 31st
Jan..2006 in Buddha Krishak Samuh, Haranamur-1. At the time of
monitoring, all the members were collected & informed about the duration of
installment. After that, they have initiated the project & second
installment has been released to the farmers group.
In F.Y. 2063/64 Bahuudhyasiya Fish
& Pig Rearing Group, Patana-7, Laxmi Saving & Credit Group,
Parsoiya-8/9, Jayma Kali Samudaik Sanstha, Dohani-5, Dafe Samudaik Sanstha,
Pakadi-7, Satyam, Sundaram, Kamal Saving & Credit Groups, Dumara-4, Shiv
Taja Veg. Production Group, Tilaurakot-1, Samay Farmers Group, Baluhawa-4, Samay & Chadani Saving Group, Dohani – 2
& 1, Hariyali Farmers Group, Baluhawa-1, Bishal Mishrit Group, Baidauli-3
& few others LIF projects have been not utilized their installment
properly. Therefore, they have not performed their activities in project period.
Hence they would not get their installment due to DADC meeting decision.
C. Less use of Agriculture Implements:
This case was observed by technical
monitoring team dated on 18th Feb..2006 in Garivi Niwaran Samudayik
Sanstha & Saraswati Samudayik Sansthas, Dohani-4 Mainihawa under LIF. These
groups were installed Treadle pumps for vegetable production from first
installment amount. But they were not using for the purpose of irrigation. They
were awared & initiated to make use of the treadle pumps by using bamboo
& planting vegetable seeds of spring season.
Another case was found in Jan Adarsh
Samajik Kendra (S.P) , Barakulpur visit
of 24th Dec.2005. This S.P. has implemented one irrigation project
in Janachetana Krishak Samuh, Buddhi-2. Where electric motor was purchased but
not installed due to electric supply near installation spot. Therefore, team
has suggested to co-ordinate with concerned stakeholder to supply electricity.
So that farmers can benefited as soon as possible.
In F.Y. 2063/64 Banganga Dairy Milk
Production Co. Org. Ltd., Banganga, Siddartha Bazaar Bikash Committee,
Gajehada, Jansewa Samajik Sanstha, Parshoiya, King Project, Taulihawa, Adarsh
Manav Utthan Sanstha, Haranampur, SICO, Kopawa have been suggested to make proper way of agriculture implements
machines & instruments.
D. Staff salary claimed but not mobilized in field:
This case fount in Sarwanging vikash
Kendra, Shihokhor by monitoring team (DPC, DLSO, DPA & J.T) dated 25th
feb.2006. This S.P. has claimed salary of 3 month for social mobilizer, was not
mobilized in group regularly. So that the monitoring team has made a note to
reduce the salary amount claimed. Side by side the S.P has claimed tonic for
goats, but the team was not found any residue or packet or Bottle from farmers.
The S.P was made to distribute the tonic.
Many cases have been found not
mobilizing the technical staff as well as social mobilizer in the field. They
have been punished by deducting their installment amount.
E. Project change:
·
First case was found by monitoring
team (SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA) dated 15th Dec.2005 in Shivshakti Machha
Mahila Krishak Samuh, Dohani-3, Mainihawa. This group has implemented on fish
farming project & Rs.15000.00 released in first installment from that
amount they has kept fingerlings in leased pond & purchased bran, lime,
cake & used. But pond owner has harvested growing fish slowly. So that, the
team has suggested to change the program according to their needs. This project
was converted in Goat raising. Now, they are happy.
·
Another case was found in Niharika Samajhik Seva Kendra,
Manpur by monitoring team (SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA) dated 25th Dec.2005.
The S.P has implemented fish farming project in lease. That group was not
properly used due to water & pond owner problem. So that, the project was
converted into off seasonal vegetable production with treadle pump.
·
In F.Y. 2063/64 one case was found in Mukti Samajik Bikash
Kendra, Dharmapaniya-7 which was duplication with LFP projects, was converted
in to boring pump set.
· And another one fish project of Tauleshwarnath
Bahuudhyasia Farmers Group, Pakadi-6 has been change in to Goat Rearing
Project. Like wise, another irrigation boring project of Ghaghawa Jal
Upabhokata Samuh, Patana and fish farming project of Jyoti Fish Farmer Group
have been changed in to Treadle Pump.
F. Trying to Misuse the
fund
After submission of bills receipt with recommendation of
BMC, key persons of the farmers group has shown the pond other to technical
monitoring committee and staff that technical have kept & fertilize, feds
of fish have been supplied from 1st
installment of Rs 15000/ according to TMC report 2nd installment has been paid
& amount of Rs.7000/. As the receiving of 3rd installment area in charge of
Moist asked with chair person & treasure regarding the expenditure. During
the enquiry they have beaten to chair person & treasure. Fact has been
found out & they have made to change
the activities in to goat keeping according
to consent of group members. Treasure become agrees to refund the amount. Group
has in charge distributed 15 goats in presence of local in charge. Goats have
been tagged & tablets of internal parasite have been fed.
Similar type of case was happened in Maya Devi
Multipurpose Women Farmers Group. Titirkhi-6, project was contracted for fish
production by 20 female farmers. Key person of the group were trying to cheat
other members. Two times group has been informed at the time of monitoring.
Once, monitoring team of SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA & Journalist has visited there & meeting of group
members, local leader in charging NCP moist. They have conducted to purchase 22
goats. They were tagged & anti parasite tables have been fed.
In F.Y.2063/64 Ganga Saving Group,
Parsoiya, Ganga Farmers Group, Haranampur-2, Birendra Bahuudhyasia Farmer
Group, Tilaurakot, Dalit Jagarn Group, Hariharpur, Laxmi & Niharika Farmers
Group, Rangpur, Unnati Goat, Dalit Pig, Loharauli Goat and Ram Poultry Farmers
group, Basantpur, Jivikoparjan, Samuhik Women Poultry, Kishan Goat, Dalit Women
Goat Rearing Group, Parshoiya Marahimai Samudaik Sanstha, Maharajgunj,
Jankalyan, Araniko, Jaykali & Jaybuddha Saving Group, Abhirawa, Bishnu,
Nawadurge, Laxmi Dalit Sewa Samuh of Dohani-4, Siddhartha Pasu Bikash Group,
Mahuwa-2, Janaki B.U.Farmers Group, Maharajgunj-1, Kapilmuni Women Farmers
Group, Kapilvastu-12 and Nawadurga Farmers Group, Balaramawapur have trying to misuse the fund which have
been made in proper line.
19. Some of the
controlling mechanism initiated
·
Program orientation of SPs before
project agreement by DSU.
·
Project Orientation before
commencing the project in the field by SPs.
·
Program Board (LIF/DEF
implemented projects.)
·
Regular S.P. co-ordination
meeting
·
Discussion with BMC about DEF
projects before approval.
·
VDC label Orientation by
concerned S.P. before program implementation.
·
Review meeting by concerned S.P.
·
BMC Meeting
·
Publishing the details of the
project in the newspaper time to time and displaying the paper cutting in
public places.
·
Public Audit
·
Labeling on material distributed
(like Treadle pump, Sprayer, rose cane, pump set, motor, milk cane etc.)
·
Displaying of financial summary
of the project board. in project side .
·
Using FM Radio, cable, daily
/weekly new paper, Telephone, mobile medium of communication.
·
Publishing the name of standard
& sub standard work performed SPs.
·
Make submission of photocopies of
account passbook.
·
Checking of account, store,
meeting room in SP office & farmers groups.
20.
Leaf let pamphlet publication
In fiscal year2061-62
- LIF introduction folder in Nepali and Abadhi (local language).
- Fish and Banana farming folder
In fiscal
year2062-63
1. A glance on APPSP-2062: containing details of
APPSP, DADF, Process of fund release, proposal submission & evaluation,
different types of committees & their role & responsibility, profile of
DEF & LIF projects, maps showing coverage of VDCs. Few articles on package
and practices of TPS, Potato & tomato, Problems and solution of opening
grazing system of Kapilvastu, PPR of goats and sheep's, Human development is foundation
of physical development, Few program photos, Information of about district
2. Calendar of 2062/63: containing super goal,
goal & purpose of APPSP, fund flow & quotation for awareness.
3. Goat Rearing: Package and practices
of goat management.
4.
Rainy season of onion
farming
5. Bee keeping: Package and practices
of bee-keeping.
6. Pig Rearing: Package and practices
of pig management.
7. Vegetable Nursery management booklet
8. Mushroom package and practices
In year
2063-64
9.
Calendar of 2063/64: containing Monthly farming operation tips, A
glance of DADF implementation photos, super goal, goal & purpose of APPSP
,fund flow & quotation for awareness.
10.
Bee keeping: Package and practices of bee-keeping.
11.
Ginger: Package and practices of ginger cultivation.
12.
Social Mobilization Process: Containing 30pages
process of social mobilization, SPs contact no., Calendar etc.
13.
Modern Agriculture Technology : Package and practices of
Seasonal & off seasonal veg., river belt veg., nursery, soil, rat control,
neem, plant protection measure, sun flower, fish, papaya, banana, mushroom,
bee-keeping, goat, pig, poultry etc. market day of kapilvastu, seed production
technology, irrigation etc. of 247 pages.
14.
A glance on APPSP-2064: containing details of APPSP, DADF, Process
of fund release, proposal submission & evaluation, different types of
committees, profile of DEF & LIF projects, maps showing coverage of VDCs,
till now achievement under DADF implementation.
15.
BMC roles and
responsibility in nepali and Abadhi.
In year 2064-65
16. Publication of calendar
indicating
LIF and DEF of different year in map.
21.
Major Agro-Inputs and Animals Distributed by DEF and LIF Project
· No of treadle pump 3280
- Honey extractor 3
- TPS (g) 948
- Fish fingerlings 170010
Details of LIF and DEF inputs in Table 22
|
Table: 22
Major inputs, quantity and market value in Rs. of DEF
LIF
|
|
Total
Input
|
|
DEF Projects
|
LIF Projects
|
|
SN
|
Input
Type
|
Unit
|
Quantity
|
Market
Value
|
SN
|
Input
Type
|
Unit
|
Quantity
|
Market
Value
|
|
1
|
No of treadle pump
|
No.
|
1322
|
2644000
|
1
|
No of treadle pump
|
No.
|
1958
|
3916000
|
|
2
|
No of tubewell
|
No.
|
94
|
1880000
|
2
|
No of tubewell
|
No.
|
18
|
360000
|
|
3
|
Pump set
|
No.
|
49
|
1225000
|
3
|
Pump set
|
No.
|
20
|
500000
|
|
4
|
Electric motor
|
No.
|
28
|
280000
|
4
|
Electric motor
|
No.
|
11
|
110000
|
|
5
|
Irrigation channel
|
No.
|
7
|
580000
|
5
|
Irrigation channel
|
No.
|
1
|
580000
|
|
6
|
sprayer
|
No.
|
82
|
205000
|
6
|
sprayer
|
No.
|
141
|
352500
|
|
7
|
Water cane
|
No.
|
315
|
63000
|
7
|
Water cane
|
No.
|
374
|
74800
|
|
8
|
Market stall
|
No.
|
3
|
1120000
|
8
|
Market stall
|
No.
|
0
|
1120000
|
|
9
|
Goat
|
No.
|
2617
|
5234000
|
9
|
Goat
|
No.
|
825
|
1650000
|
|
10
|
He Goat
|
No.
|
127
|
508000
|
10
|
He Goat
|
No.
|
67
|
268000
|
|
11
|
Pig
|
No.
|
210
|
315000
|
11
|
Pig
|
No.
|
62
|
93000
|
|
12
|
Buffalo
|
No.
|
28
|
560000
|
12
|
Buffalo
|
No.
|
0
|
0
|
|
13
|
Chilling vat
|
No.
|
1
|
680000
|
13
|
Chilling vat
|
No.
|
0
|
680000
|
|
14
|
Cane
|
No.
|
22
|
33000
|
14
|
Cane
|
No.
|
0
|
33000
|
|
15
|
Bee hive & colony
|
No.
|
251
|
8032000
|
15
|
Bee hive & colony
|
No.
|
36
|
1152000
|
|
16
|
Honey extractor
|
No.
|
3
|
9000
|
16
|
Honey extractor
|
No.
|
0
|
0
|
|
17
|
TPS
(g)
|
No.
|
788
|
35460
|
17
|
TPS
(g)
|
No.
|
160
|
7200
|
|
18
|
Fish fingerlings
|
No.
|
56760
|
56760
|
18
|
Fish fingerlings
|
No.
|
113250
|
113250
|
|
19
|
Chick
|
No.
|
460
|
23000
|
19
|
Chick
|
No.
|
2377
|
118850
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
23483220
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11128600
|
22. Outputs
- Increased
accessibility to the resources of remote rural, disadvantaged and poor
communities.
- Increased the
capacity of NGO's, CBO'S, Co-operatives and farmer's groups.
- Increased the
irrigated area by treadle pump, boring, pump set, motor, dam construction
and cropping intensity through integration of vegetable crop in cropping
system.
- Participatory
approach has been increasing.
- Developing of skill
and enterprises poor and excluded families.
- Generation of
employment through involving in agriculture business, treadle pump &
boring installation, purchasing goat & pig, involving of staff in
project as technicians/non-technicians.
- Increased the
consumption rate of green and fresh vegetables.
- Substitution of import of vegetable from India.
- Use of improved
seed, animal breed, fertilizers, micronutrients and pesticide has been
increased.
- Practice of selling
vegetable is being increasing.
- Utilization of
natural resources, local and indigenous technology.
- Agricultural area
has been diversifying.
- Empowerment of
disadvantaged poor, & remote farmers group & farmers.
- Mobilized local
service providers (NGOs, CBOs & Cooperatives) in rural remote area.
- Increase income level
of farmers groups.
- Adaptation of new
improved vegetable production & live stock technology.
- Increased accessibility to the
resources
- Increased the capacity of NGO's,
CBO'S, Co-operatives and farmer's groups.
- Increased women participation
- Participatory approach is being
increasing.
- Developed skill and
entrepreneurship of poor and excluded families.
- Self employment generated
Output from different
from products
(Rs
8.77Lakhs)
(Rs 7 lakhs)
- Chicken meat Prod.:3080k.g (Rs.41800)
- Pig :210
- Pork value ; Rs.14 lakhs
- Milk
Prod. :14000Liter
(Rs.2.8 lakhs)
- Vegetable Production area: 492875.63 Ha
- Vegetable Production: 9085 MT
- Productivity : 10.37MT/Ha
- Vegetable marketed 5632.7 MT
- Vegetable consumed :4552.2 MT
- Income from Veg. sold : Rs.84.5
million
- Cropping intensity: 190-230 % of project
area
23. Problems related to project implementation
- Getting any
information (data, records, progress)
from SPs & FGs is difficult.
- No bodies guide the
illiterate farmers regarding proposal submission, installment release
mechanism. Bill & receipt preparation & format fill up. So extra
amount will expend. Therefore, no timely settlement of advance.
- Deduction of 1.5%
Taxation from DEF project make poor in qualitative service & inputs
support to poor & excluded.
- PPR infestation,
outbreak in goat & non availability of proper breed of goat, pig &
poultry.
- Bird flue in poultry
discourages the poultry farmers.
- Non available of
appropriate var. hybrid seed of high
- Few cooperatives are
non sustainable.
- Advance settlement
in end of F.Y. create problem in effectiveness of the project.
- Activities
incomplete but submit the complete report.
- No proper knowledge
of how to conduct the project activities (like technical activities,
orientation meeting, public audit)
- A vast amount are
expending non program activities compare to previous year (tax, logistic
support etc.).
- Fishery failure due
to water use in irrigation.
- Dog biting problem
to goat.
- Lengthy and long
process from proposal receivable to project implementation.
- Budget release
process is lengthy and untimely.
- Approved budget has
been not resealed.
- District Monitoring
Committee is not functional.
- Due to illiterate,
proposal submission by layman is difficult.
- Poor capacity of
service providers in the district will effect the project implementation.
- Less manpower and
equipments with S.P.
- Problem of advance
settlement in case of LIF.
- Chances of
duplication of the projects.
- Supply of
agri-inputs by few SPs. and FGs. are of low quantity and quality.
- Contribution of SPs.
& FGs. is not according to agreement.
- Staff recruitment
and their mobilization by SPs. is less.
- Not proper
participation of beneficiaries in proposal writing.
- Lack of availability
of quality agri. inputs in local market.
- Unavailability of
quality input in local market (Agro-vet)
- Difficult to get
Bamboo or wood for installment of treadle pump.
- Lack of information
to BMC regarding project details.
- No maintaining of
farmers group register accordingly & no regular meeting.
24. Learning
- Regular monitoring
is very effective for rectifying the difficulties in project
implementation.
- Displaying of
program budget board in project spot in begining is very effective for
awareness as well as transparent.
- Organization of
project orientation by SPs in beginning has made smooth implementation.
- Program discussion
with BMC members in DEF has supported for actual demand of the community.
- SP's workshop has
helped to share the knowledge experiences among the SPs.
- Sharing workshop
with Hardware's & Agro-vets has helped to supply quality materials and
prevent unnecessary billing.
- Tagging of goat has
made to prevent duplication.
- Labeling on
agricultural implement (like sprayer, Treadle pump, pump set etc.) has
made easily identified for APPSP program.
- BMC meeting soon
after the project agreement is effective.
- Participation of DSU
member in orientation, public audit & project monitoring is effective.
25. Issues
- Difficult
to process proposal received in two month period.
- Due to
absent of any key members of TSC difficult to forward evaluation and award
process.
- Due to
unavailability of citizenship & account difficult to contract out of
LIF projects timely.
- Very
long gap of proposal receiving, evaluation, approval & contract out
will make difficult in program implementation.
- Maximum
time for administrative work will not permit for program monitoring.
- Political
situation (band) has affected the program implementation.
- Fund
release from DDC through Fund & Dist. Treasury Office makes difficult
timely release of first installments.
- Getting
financial information from DADO for reporting in difficult.
- Cheque
transfer from one bank to other bank will make burden and extra expenses
to LIF farmers groups.
- Adjustment
of first installment for LIF farmers groups is difficult.
- Not
release of all the approved budget has made difficult to pay installment.
- Lack
of man power in DSU, difficult to complete all the work efficiently.
- Lack
of training, visit to DSU staffs will affect the efficient work.
- Less
internalization for the program by DADO, DLSO staff
- No
timely response (financial/program related) from CSU will make, week to
DSU in the district.
- There
is no marketing, institutional development, refresher, activities for
sustainability of the program.
- Advance on the
account of DPA & settlement after joint signature is problem.
26.
Recommendations
- Monthly
S.P. Coordination meeting should be provision
- Monthly
project staffs (Progress) meeting
- Training
on social mobilization, public Audit, report writing, proposal writing,
account keeping, risk & organization Management, treadle pump,
sprayer, pump set repair & maintenance training.
- Training
to Agriculture/Livestock technician regarding new/modern technology.
- Additional
reservation (Storage) of the PPR vaccine in emergency time.
- Controlling
against open grazing, cow dung burning.
- Fish
pound contracted one for long way period.
- Better
to adjust proposal submission according to fund flow that is quarterly.
- To be
made alternative provision in absence of key person.
- Time
period should be fixed by DADC & DDC for approval.
- Quarterly
processing certainly helps monitoring work.
- Timely
release of fund.
- Post
Office Bank account very much suitable to farmers group for transaction.
- There
should be timely response from CSU.
- Follow up program
must be required.
27.Case
Study
DEF
A.Dalit Social Development Centre, Gotihawa was
implemented one DEF project of goat rearing for income generation of Dalit
community of Gotihawa VDC (southern part of Kapilvastu) in F.Y. 2061-62. That
project was completed in F.Y. 2063 Baishak. In the project, there were 4 grps
includes 60 households among them 22 female 58 Dalit & 2 others and 52
poor.
Total project cost was of
NRs.500300.00 of that only NRs. 4 Lakhs was supported by DADF & 1 lakh of
community contribution.
Project was lunched by conducting
training on goat rearing, support in goat distribution (2 each persons) &
other supporting activities like drenching, dipping, technical assistance.
Among the beneficiaries, Ms. Sohawati Pasi has told that she has made 11
goats from 2 goats during the 20 months period. She has earned Rs. 5300.00 by
selling the goat kids & hegoats. At present she has 4 pregnant & puberty
goats. Now, she is able to share her husband income level & spending the
few amounts in educating the children as well as saving the money in group as a
saving & credit activities.
Likewise Ms. Prem Sudha Raidash (Chamar) has position of having 12 goats
& kids after death of 5 kids during the period from 2 pregnant goats. She
has sold only of NRs. 4000.00. She has also encouraged from goat rearing
occupation.
B.One DEF project conducted by Sunshine
Social Development Centre, Dhankauli of agricultural activities for poverty
alleviation in north bank of Banganga river ie Dhankauli 1,2,7,8,2,9 for 12
grps (279 HH, 229 Female, 167 Dalit, 82 Janjati) . DADF contribution was NRs.
5, 00,000.00. The project was completed in F.Y.2062-63.
One
beneficiaries, Mr. Panch Ram Pasi (who
is the member of Dalit Shriman Shrimati Saving Group, Dhankauli-9) has got 2
pig from same project which has made 20 pigs during the period of 12 months. He
has earned Rs.4500.00 by selling per pig.
1.A case study of Namuna Krisak Samuh, Hathousa under DEF Project.
S.P. Name : Namuna
Krisak Samuh
Address : Hathousa-8
Project Name : TPS
Potato
Duration of the project : From
2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15
Total contribution : NRs. 269560
Community Contribution : NRs.
140160
SP contribution : NRs. 10000
APPSP contribution : NRs. 119400
Details of
Beneficiaries
Total : 50
Female : 5
Male : 45
Dalit : 4
DND : 8
UC : 38
Poor : 50
Name of the chairperson :
Mr. Chandrakant Acharya
Treasurer Name :
Mr. Tanknath Marasini
Support
No. of Participant : 50
Training on TPS Potato Production : 1days
TPS distribution : 600 gm
Pesticide & Micro Nutrient
distribution : 50
Fertilizer distribution : 50 (Urea, DAP, MOP)
Sprayer tank : 2
Water cane : 5
Rented Cold Store : 1
Total area : 1Hec.
Production : 102.11 quintal
Expected Income : 10 Lakhs
Expected income/person : NRs.20000
Coverage area : 17 Hec.
2. A case study
of Lumbini Integrated Development
Organization under DEF Project.
S.P.
Name : Lumbini Integrated Development
Organization
Address : Manpur – 1
Project
Name : Integrated Agriculture program for Ultra
poor
Duration
of the project : From 2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15
Total
contribution : NRs. 581484
Community
Contribution : NRs. 100454
SP
contribution : NRs.
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 481030
Details of
Beneficiaries
No
of Farmers Group: 10
Total : 182
Female :
103
Male :
79
Dalit :
4
Dis
Jan : 84
Reli
M. : 2
UC :
92
Poor :
182
Name of the
chairperson : Mr. Mayraj Khan
Treasurer
Name : Mr. Athar Kamal khan
Name of the
group : Kotiyali Farmers
group, Gajedha-3 Gangaulia
Chair
man : Chandra panth
Support
Orientation
No. of
beneficiaries : 50
Goat Rearing
Management training:2
No of
participant : 128
Program Board
: 1
Sprayer tank : 10
Water cane : 57
Goat
Distribution : 61
He goat
Distribution : 3
Tagging : 64
Vaccination : 64
Medicine : 64
Public audit : 1
Achievements
House Hold
benefited directly :
25
Expected area
under irrigation : 3 hac.
Increment
cropping density : 300 %
Expected
income/person : Rs.15000/
3. A case study of
Lumbini Samajik Sewa Kendra under DEF Project.
S.P. Name : Lumbini
Samajik Sewa Kendra
Address : Jayanagar - 8
Project
Name : Hat Bajar Management
Duration
of the project : From 2063/08/ to 2064/04
Total
contribution : NRs. 581474
Community
Contribution : NRs. 20000
SP
contribution : NRs. 10000
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 581474
Details of Beneficiaries
No
Of Farmers Group :19
Total : 312
Female :
186
Male :
126
Dalit :
80
DND : 50
Dis
Jan : 63
Adv
jan : 40
Reli
M. : 6
UC :
73
Poor :
312
Name of the
chairperson : Mr. Hem Raj Subedi
Treasurer
Name : Mr. Tek Raj Poudel
Support
Orientation
No.
of Participant :
50
Drainage
Constrictions : 23*54 meters size
Marked
Shed : 14
Total
area : 1Hec.
Public
audit : 1
Program
Board : 1
Achievement
Increased
space for market : 64 stalls
Increased
access to the market : 312 Farmers of 6 VDCs
Future
Plan : There will be bi- weekly market insted
once in a
week from inauguration.
Hygienic
meat, fruit, fresh vegetable etc will be available to the consumer as well
farmer could able to sell their agricultural and livestock products in proper
rate in time.
4. A case study of
Social Awareness & Development Organization under DEF Project.
S.P.
Name : Social Awareness & Development
Organization
Address : Banganga
Project
Name : Pig rearing Program for Dalit
Duration
of the project : From 2062/08/12 to 2063/08/11
Total
contribution : NRs. 244570
Community
Contribution : NRs. 16000
SP
contribution : NRs. 6000
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 222570
Details of
Beneficiaries
No of Farmers Group: 2
Total :
42
Female :
26
Male :
16
Dalit :
32
Dis Jan : 9
Reli M. : 2
UC :
1
Poor :
42
Name
of the chairperson : Mr. Lal Bdr
Baudoli
Treasurer
Name : Mr. Arjun. Raskoti
Support
No.
of Participant :
42
Pig
Rearing Management training : 2
Pig
Distribution : 80
Shed
construction :
80
Medicine
:
80
Achievements:
Pig : 80
under production
Expected
Income : Rs. 6 lakh
Expected
income/person/ year : Rs. 8000/
Increased
the capacity of the poor and excluded, have felt piggery as an entrepreneur.
5. A
case study of Namuna Krisak Samuh, Hathousa under DEF Project.
S.P.
Name : Namuna Krisak Samuh
Address : Hathousa-8
Duration
of the project : From 2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15
Total
contribution : NRs. 269560
Community
Contribution : NRs. 140160
SP
contribution : NRs. 10000
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 119400
Details of Beneficiaries
Total :
50
Female :
5
Male :
45
Dalit :
4
DND :
8
UC :
38
Poor :
50
Name of the
chairperson : Mr. Chandrakant Acharya
Treasurer
Name : Mr. Tanknath
Marasini
Support
No.
of Participant :
50
Training
on TPS Potato Production :
1days
TPS
distribution :
600 gm
Pesticide
& Micro Nutrient distribution : 50
Fertilizer
distribution :
50 (Urea, DAP, MOP)
Sprayer
tank : 2
Water
cane : 5
Rented
Cold Store : 1
Total
area : 1Hec.
Production : 102.11 quintal
Expected
Income :
10 Lakhs
Expected
income/person : NRs.20000
Coverage
area : 17 Hec.
LIF
1. A case study of
Laxmi Crop Production Group, Niglihawa-6 under LIF project.
Group Name : Laxmi
Crop Production Group
Address : Niglihawa-7,
Pachehara
Formation Date : 2062/06/07
Supporting agency : DADO, Kapilvastu.
Project Name : TPS
Potato
Objective : Income
generating & supply of TPS F Taber
Duration of the project : From
2062/08/07 to 2063/01/07
Total contribution : NRs. 29200
Group Contribution : NRs. 4200
APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of
Beneficiaries
Total : 18
Female : 5
Male : 13
Dalit : 17
DND : 1
Poor : 14
Name of the chairperson :
Mr. Ram Brichha Kharbind
Treasurer Name :
Mr. Gulab Kewat
Support
No. of Participant : 18
Training on TPS Nursery management : 2
days
IPM Training : 1 day
TPS distribution : 36 gm
Pesticide & Micro Nutrient
distribution : 18
Fertilizer distribution : 18 (Urea, DAP, MOP)
Sprayer tank : 1
Water cane : 18
Total area : 14 Kattha
Production : 40 quintal (Stored in Laxmi cold store in Bhairahawa)
Expected Income : 4 Lakhs (If sold @ NRs. 100/kg)
Expected income/person : NRs.22000
Future Plan : Next year, are will be
4-5kattha/farmer
2. A case study of
Siddhartha Multi-purpose Farmer Group under LIF project.
Group Name : Siddhartha
Multi-purpose Farmer Group
Address : Titirkhi-3,
Titirkhi
Formation Date : 2061/06/07
Supporting agency : DADO, Kapilvastu.
Project Name : Fish
Farming (Revised Goat rearing
due to technical problem)
Objective : Income
generating
Duration of the project : 6
months
Total contribution : NRs. 35935
Group Contribution : NRs. 10935
APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of
Beneficiaries
Total : 27
Female : 21
Male : 6
Dalit : 27
Poor : 15
Name of the chairperson :
Mr. Surbal Harijan
Treasurer Name :
Mr. Rajendra Pd. Raidash
Support
No. of Participant : 27
Training on fish farming : 1 day
After submission of bills receipt with
recommendation of BMC, key persons of the farmers group has shown the pond
other to technical monitoring committee and staff that technical have kept
& fertilize, feds of fish have been supplied from 1st installment of Rs 15000/ according
to TMC report 2nd installment has been paid & amount of Rs.7000/. As the
receiving of 3rd installment area in charge of Moist asked with chair person
& treasure regarding the expenditure. During the enquiry they have beaten
to chair person & treasure. Fact has been found out & they have made to
change the activities in to goat keeping according to consent of group members.
Treasure become agrees to refund the amount. Group has in charge distributed 15
goats in presence of local in charge. Goats have been tagged & tablets of
internal parasite have been fed.
3.
Brief of Sita Vegetable Production group Under LIF Project.
Group
Name : Sita vegetable production group
Address : Banskhor -7
Location : 11 K.M. from district head quarter in
east
Formation
Date : 2060/8/9
Supporting
agency : Nepal SIMI, Kapilvastu.
Project
Name : Vegetable
production
Objective : Income generation
Duration
of the project : From 2063/07/26 to 2064/01/15 BS
Total
contribution : NRs. 29950
Group
Contribution : NRs. 4950
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of Beneficiaries
Total : 24
Female : 22
Male : 2
Dalit :
14
DND :
8
Poor :
22
Name of the
chairperson : Mr. Sunarmati Chai
Treasurer
Name : Mr.Daya Ram Yadav
Support
No.
of Participant :
24
Training
on Vegetable management :
1 days
Seed
distribution :
24 Farmers
Fertilizer
:
22 Farmers
Sprayer
: 1
Water
cane : 24
Micro
nutrients :
18 Farmers
Treadle
Pump :
5
Project
board :
1
Achievement
Increased area
under irrigation : 12 kattha
Vegetable
Production : 19 quintal
Income : Rs.
26,000/
Income/person : Rs. 1500/
Future
Plan : Next year, there will be double the
area of vegetable production intensive cultivation.
4. A Brief of Durga
Dalit Utthan group Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa, Under LIF Project.
Group
Name : Durga Dalit Utthan group
Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa
Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in
south
Formation
Date : 2063/7 /30
Supporting
agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.
Project
Name : Goat Rearing
Objective : Income generating & DALIT women
empowerment
Duration
of the project : From 2063/07/30 to 2064/02/30 B.S.
Total
contribution : NRs. 31625
Group
Contribution : NRs. 6625
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of Beneficiaries
Total : 15
Female :
15
Male :
Dalit :
15
DND :
0
Poor :
15
Name of the
chairperson : Ms. Chanarmati Pasi
Treasurer
Name : Ms. Shubhawati Pasi
Support
No.
of Participant :
15
Training
on Goat rearing management : 1 day
Goat
distribution :
14
He
Goat distribution : 1
Tagging : 15
Vaccination
: 15
Achievement
Goat
number : 14
Pregnant : 4
Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)
Future
Plan : Next year, there will be a 4
times more no. of Goats.
Learnt
about goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.
5. A Brief of Maya
Devi Gautam Dalit Utthan Group under LIF Project.
Group
Name : Maya Devi Gautam Dalit Utthan Group
Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa
Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in
south
Formation
Date : 2062/2 /5
Supporting
agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.
Project
Name : Goat Rearing
Objective : Income generating & DALIT women
empowerment
Duration
of the project : From 2063/06/30 to 2064/02/30
Total
contribution : NRs. 31625
Group
Contribution : NRs. 4665
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of Beneficiaries
Total : 14
Female :
14
Male :
0
Dalit :
14
DND :
0
Poor :
14
Name of the
chairperson : Ms. Laxmi Pasi
Treasurer
Name : Ms. Sonmati Raidash
Support
No.
of Participant :
14
Training
on Goat rearing management : 1 days
Goat
distribution :
13
He
Goat distribution : 1
Tagging : 14
Vaccination
: 14
Project
board :
1
Achievement
Goat
number : 14
Buck : 1
Pregnant : 4
Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)
Future
Plan : Next year, there will be a 4 times
more no. of Goats.
Learnt
about goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.
6. A Brief of
Saraswati Income group Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa, Under LIF Project.
Group
Name : Saraswati Income group
Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa
Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in
south
Formation
Date : 2063/4 /30
Supporting
agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.
Project
Name : Goat Rearing
Objective : Income generating & DALIT women
empowerment
Duration
of the project : From 2063/07/30 to 2064/02/30
Total
contribution : NRs. 31625
Group
Contribution : NRs. 6625
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of Beneficiaries
Total : 15
Female : 15
Male :
Dalit :
15
DND :
1
Poor :
15
Name of the
chairperson : Ms. Chanarmati Pasi
Treasurer
Name : Ms. Shubhawati Pasi
Support
No.
of Participant :
15
Training
on Goat rearing management : 1 days
Goat
distribution :
14
He
Goat distribution : 1
Tagging : 15
Vaccination
: 15
Project
board :
1
Goat
number : 14
Goat
number : 14
Achievement
Goat number : 14
Buck : 1
Pregnant : 4
Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)
Future Plan : Next year, there will be a 4 times
more no. of Goats.
Learnt about
goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.
7. A Brief of Tauleshwar Nath Vegetable Farmers group Under
LIF Project.
Group
Name : Tauleshwar Nath vegetable farmers group
Address : Gotihawa -7
Location : 6 K.M. from district head quarter in
south
Formation
Date : 2060/12/9
Supporting
agency : DAD Office, Kapilvastu.
Project
Name : Vegetable production
Objective : Income generation
Duration
of the project : From 2063/08/4 to 2064/02/4 BS
Total
contribution : NRs. 32750
Group
Contribution : NRs. 7500
APPSP
contribution : NRs. 25000
Details of
Beneficiaries Total : 18
Female :
Male :
18
Dalit :
6
DND :
9
R M :2
Others :1
Poor :
18
Name of the
chairperson : Mr. Madhav Ahir
Treasurer
Name : Mr. Hari krishana
yadav
Support
No.
of Participant :
18
Training
on Vegetable management : 1 days
Vegetable
Seed distribution :
18 Farmers
Fertilizer
:
18 Farmers
Spray
: 1
Micronutrients : 18 Farmers
Treadle
Pump :
7
Project
board :
1
Achievement
Increased
area under irrigation : 25 kattha
Crops : Bhendi, cow pea, Chilly, Bottle gourd, Sponge gourd
Vegetable
Production : 35 quintal (still under harvest)
Income : Rs.
36,000/
Income/person /season : Rs. 1600/
Future Plan : Next year, there will be double the
area of vegetable production intensive cultivation.
8. A case study
of Shahasi Farmers group, Gajedha-6 Karmanaha under LIF
Project.
Name of the group : Shahasi Farmers group, Gajedha-6 Karmanaha
Chair man : Parwati Khanal
Support
Orientation
No.
of beneficiaries :
50
Goat
Rearing Management training : 2
No
of participant :
128
Program
Board : 1
Sprayer
tank : 10
Water
cane : 235
Goat
Distribution : 270
He
goat Distribution :
7
Tagging
: 277
Vaccination
:
277
Medicine
:
277
Bee
hive :
27
Public
audit : 1
Achievements of visiting
Group
House
Hold benefited directly
: 27
Honey
production
: 400 Kg
Income : Rs. 60000/
Expected
income/person/ year : Rs.13000/ .
Mr Rajendra Khatik a
member of Jan kalian Farmers group, Hariharpur 1 was received one treadle pump
(TP) among 5 TP in group and hybrid veg seed, one sprayer. He succeeded to grow cauliflower in
1.5 kathha and he produced 4 quintal cauliflower, earned about Rs2900 after consumption
of 12 members in family.
In summer season he succeed to grow 125 kg
tomato and 1 quintal radish, he earned about 6000 rupees. Now he has become
model farmers in his village. He started sending hi children in school . He
also succeded to cure cronic urinary problem of long time.
By
learning from him Shova Raids has also started doing in his path for better income.
Part 2
28. Summary of Lesson Learning Workshops.
|
Lesson
Learning Workshop of District Agriculture Development Fund, Kapilvastu
|
|
Venue : DADO, Kapilvastu
|
|
|
|
Date
:2065/5/10
|
|
Participants : DADC members
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Participants : 19
|
|
Facilitator : Mr. Padam Bd. Shakya, Mr. Ram Mani
Poudyal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques :
|
DADF as a process and mechanism for decentralized
service delivery
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Strength
|
Priority
|
Description
of Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended
Action for Weakness
|
|
1
|
DADF inclusive & Justifiable
|
1
|
Proposal evaluation process long & trouble
some
|
1
|
Simplify evaluation
|
|
2
|
Implementation process is inclusive
|
5
|
Social mobilize & Technical support is not
available
|
3
|
Support of Social mobilize and Technical support
|
|
3
|
Based on LSGA 2055, Bylaws & guidelines
purposed
|
2
|
No profit tools of financial proposal evaluation
|
4
|
Tolls of financial proposal evaluation
|
|
4
|
Bottom up demand driven
|
4
|
less budget but more installments
|
2
|
At least 50,000 for LIF
|
|
5
|
Local organization are priorities
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description
of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Participatory mentality immerged from small
amount support
|
1
|
Negative image of community with less budget
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
Capacity building of community
|
2
|
No assurance of many groups with lack of
continuation
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
Opportunity of
local organization in Agriculture & Livestock's
|
3
|
Recommended
Action
|
|
|
|
|
Recommended
Action
|
|
Need to increase the fund limit
|
|
|
|
1
|
DADF continuation
|
|
Initiative taken for DADF continue & matching
fund
|
|
|
|
2
|
Organization form to forms groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Special attention to organization development
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques :
|
DADF’s ability to target Poverty and Social
Exclusion
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Strength
|
Priority
|
Description
of Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended
Action for Weakness
|
|
1
|
Opportunity to
local NGOs for project
|
2
|
No sustainable development program
|
3
|
APPSP should be assured
|
|
2
|
Priority given to dalit, poor, women in
evaluation process
|
1
|
Skill needed to reach to real poor
|
1
|
Implementation of program in disadvantaged people
& area
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description
of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Opportunity for
poor, dalit, janjati & remote, RM
|
1
|
Hearing no continuation of APPSP
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
Opportunity for
emerged small NGO
|
3
|
Due to political instability, not reached to real
poor
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
Very good opportunity APPSP in Kapilvastu
|
2
|
Due to illiteracy
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques :
|
Transparency, monitoring and accountability of
DADF
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Strength
|
Priority
|
Description
of Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended
Action for Weakness
|
|
1
|
Public notice in News paper & board, Program
orientation, BMC meeting , Public audit
|
1
|
Information only for formality
|
3
|
Effective information system
|
|
2
|
Self participation of farmers in different
community
|
1
|
BMC formed from SP
|
2
|
BMC inclusion after discussion
|
|
3
|
Self evaluation by BMC
|
2
|
Not accountable after project completion
|
1
|
Follow up Program
|
|
4
|
Monitoring by district level, different committee
& concerned line agencies
|
4
|
No feasibility study during selecting project
|
4
|
Feasibility study
|
|
5
|
Monitoring by central unit
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description
of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description
of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Able to mobilize local resource
|
3
|
on the spot monitoring by stakeholder
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
Institutional promotion & extension
|
4
|
Illiteracy, poverty, irrigation, traditional
culture, custom, weak agriculture etc.
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
Participation of local NGO in program
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Target group benefited based on program objective
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Lesson Learning Workshop of SPs
|
|
|
|
Venue : IRDC,
Jaynagar and KSSC Taulihawa, Kapilvatu
|
|
|
|
Date : 2065/4/30,31
|
|
Participants
:Service Provides
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitator :
Mr. Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repoter :
Shakti Karki
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Quality of
Service Delivery by SPs/NGOs
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Conducted by
local organization.
|
|
Very less
amount approved against community demand
|
|
Need to
approved amount according to demanded amount
|
|
2
|
Priority for
poor & excluded in selection criteria
|
|
Very less
duration makes poor discouraged.
|
|
At least 2 yrs
project duration
|
|
3
|
Monitored by
BMC from beneficiaries
|
|
Project
selection process is very lengthy, hence negative views from community and SP
|
|
With in 2
months period
|
|
4
|
Demand from
poor & excluded group & proposed from them
|
|
No provision
for affiliation of group in cooperative while evaluation
|
|
Cooperative
formation
|
|
5
|
Public Audit
from P&E group & PCR preparation
|
|
No impotence
of local cooperative while evaluation
|
|
Priority to
local cooperation
|
|
6
|
Open Proposal
call & through out the year submission
|
|
Without
information 1.5% tax deduction make difficulty in project execution
|
|
No tax
deduction
|
|
7
|
Ordinary
groups of the village, can submit Rs. 25000.00 proposal
|
|
Not continuity
of program
|
|
Continuity in
Program
|
|
8
|
NGO farmers
representative related line agencies involved in proposal evaluation.
|
|
Not sufficient
Rs 10 lakhs
|
|
At least 20
lakhs
|
|
9
|
Focused to
dalit & janjatiin the group
|
|
Not believing
the receipt of farmers.
|
|
Accept only
receipts
|
|
10
|
|
|
Not timely
monitoring
|
|
timely
monitoring
|
|
11
|
Meeting
conducted by chairman of FG & groups
|
|
Not market
activities
|
|
Market program
|
|
12
|
|
|
Contribution
from farmers is very difficulty
|
|
Need to
community for contribution
|
|
13
|
|
|
Lack of
skilled technician
|
|
At least 70%
in first installment
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead should
be at least 30%
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Need to issue
ex private certificate
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
poverty program implemented
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
Classification/grading
of SP based work performance
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Dalit, janjati
& monitoring are included while selecting project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Opportunity to local organization
|
|
Barrier in
project implementation due to financial year bondage (limit)
|
|
|
|
2
|
Program focused
to P&E group
|
|
Not timely
agreement and deduction of amount has made dispute in target group
|
|
|
|
3
|
Prestige gain
from target group
|
|
Very
difficulty to cope with community due to less fund them other donors
|
|
|
|
4
|
Coordination
& accessibility of P&E group been developed at high level
|
|
Political
instability makes difficulty in timely project execution
|
|
|
|
5
|
Opportunity of employment & leadership development to disadvantaged group
|
|
Suspect to SPs
from community
|
|
|
|
6
|
Organization
development from overhead cost
|
|
Many times
office visiting for installment & advance settlement
|
|
|
|
7
|
Support in
irrigation
|
|
Political of
community
|
|
|
|
8
|
support in
income generating agriculture system
|
|
Categories
based on caste
|
|
|
|
9
|
Increased
income level of farmers
|
|
Illiterate of
target group
|
|
|
|
10
|
More
opportunity for dalit & janjati
|
|
Rich people
are feeling jealous to poor
|
|
|
|
11
|
Development of
Modern Agriculture system for rural marginalized area
|
|
No clear
concept of government & political party on NGOs
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity for capacity building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groups are
developing in cooperative/Cos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
farmers able to leave skilled develop leadership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Poor and
Exclusion targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Proposal
preparation based on community demands
|
|
Not approved
based on proposed budget
|
|
At least Rs.10
lakh
|
|
2
|
Improvement of
Agri. & livestock system of the community
|
|
No provision
of observation, training & visit
|
|
Training &
visit program
|
|
3
|
Use of local
resource & skill
|
|
No timely
monitoring & installment release
|
|
Timely
monitoring
|
|
4
|
Monitoring by
beneficiaries
|
|
Likely to partials
in selection
|
|
Clarity
|
|
5
|
Priority of
local organization in service delivery
|
|
No Provision
of proposal writing & organization development training
|
|
As proposal
|
|
6
|
Inclusive
Program
|
|
Saying long
APP but short plan
|
|
Training on
proposal writing & organization development
|
|
7
|
Project
orientation & social audit provisioned
|
|
No inclusion
in TSC
|
|
Dalit &
janjati in TSC
|
|
8
|
Ownership to
work to the SPs
|
|
Duplication in
advice by DADO
|
|
uniformly in
advice
|
|
9
|
Proposal
received from local group
|
|
Lengthy
process & trouble some
|
|
two
installment
|
|
10
|
Continuation
of proposal submission
|
|
TSC is not
accountable for processing
|
|
Empowerment of
TSC
|
|
11
|
Priority to
dalit, janjati, P&E group
|
|
Not bimonthly
proposal open & timely evaluation
|
|
Bimonthly
|
|
12
|
Participation
of community at Implementation & Monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Effective
implementation in conflict situation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduction of
1.5% tax and also submission of bills & receipts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No proper negotiation
while budgeting
|
|
Alternative,
better way
|
|
|
|
|
No good
relation by DSU & DADO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No activity
for sustainable division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Org.
development & capacity building concept activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No contingency
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No tools of
community analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unhealthy
completion of among SPs & no proper facilitation work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Good
coordination and relation among SP, program community
|
|
Cost increment
|
|
|
|
2
|
Opportunity for local people employment
|
|
1.5% taxation
|
|
|
|
3
|
poverty
reduction of local level
|
|
Pressure to
complete project at end of F.Y
|
|
|
|
4
|
institution
development
|
|
Political
instability
|
|
|
|
5
|
opportunity
for local resources & materials use
|
|
No market
management
|
|
|
|
6
|
Direct benefit
among local people
|
|
Negative
attitude of political & government to NGOs
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity for Kapilvastus' people
|
|
Pro poor are
not inclusion in program
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity for Agri. & Livestock project implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extension of
coordination with APPSP and Nepal SIMI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Transparency,
monitoring and timely support
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Open proposal
call system
|
|
No budget
allocated based on negotiation
|
|
|
|
2
|
Transparency
in proposal evaluation
|
|
Minimum salary
of technical & no timely to technician
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Transparency
in implementing process
|
|
Open not limit
of Rs.10lakh
|
|
|
|
5
|
Budget in
installment basis
|
|
Appreciation
for poor performance
|
|
|
|
6
|
Recommendation
for budget demand by BMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Orientation to
BMC regarding
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
All project
activity & budget
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Decision of
purchasing committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Monitoring by
BMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Monitoring by
SP member & meeting with group chairperson
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
District level
on the spot monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Public Audit
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Board
displayed
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Orientation
before project implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Incentive/Priority
to timer completed SPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Immediate
monitoring & settlement after bill/receipts submitted
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Financial dealing
through bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Labeling on
material & tagging to group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciate to
community contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orientation to
SP by APPSP before agreement
|
|
No provision
of group exchange monitoring
|
|
Need of
farmers group visit
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring
made to destroy the image of SPs
|
|
Without image
effected
|
|
|
|
|
Late installation
due to late monitoring
|
|
Monitoring in
time
|
|
|
|
|
No gathering
of farmers in monitoring on farming peak period
|
|
Farmers freeform
work
|
|
|
|
|
No man power
in public audit
|
|
Manpower in
public audit
|
|
|
Publication of
notice of approved SPs groups in local news paper with amount
|
|
|
|
Improved of
information system
|
|
|
Frequent
monitoring has made expected output achevivement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easy to
ammendent/ ratify the project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Description of Opportunity
|
Priority
|
Description of Threat
|
Priority
|
|
|
1
|
Available
skilled manpower in NGOs
|
|
1.5% taxation
make in comfortable
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Not timely
release of installation
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Late in
monitoring due to various reason
|
|
|
|
4
|
Self
monitoring & evaluation of program
|
|
Traditional
& lack of awareness
|
|
|
|
5
|
SP has got
opportunity in Agriculture area & up gradation
|
|
Political instability
|
|
|
|
6
|
Opportunity modern farming against traditional one
|
|
Castism/caste
conflict in society
|
|
|
|
7
|
50 % income
incresed to low income farmers
|
|
No interest of
community contribution
|
|
|
|
8
|
Opportunity of knowdge & skill development
|
|
No beilive on
NGO
|
|
|
|
9
|
P&E are
directly involved
|
|
Difficult in
conflict period
|
|
|
|
|
Faith of
community on SP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easy to work
in new program implementation
|
|
Tradition
thinking of political party, government & community on NGO
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure to
government & other agencies to be accountable & transparent
|
|
Budget
approvel not based on need of community
|
|
|
|
Lesson Learning Workshop of DEF Beneficiaries
|
|
|
|
Venue :
Agriculture Service Centre, Pakadi, Maharajgunj, Kopawa
|
|
|
Date : 2064/4/22,23,27
|
|
Participants :
DEF Beneficiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitator :
Mr. Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repoter :
Shakti Karki
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Quality of
Service Delivery by SPs/NGOs
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Support from
Local Organization to Rural Disadvantaged people
|
|
No timely
started projects
|
|
If projects
are approved at time,
|
|
2
|
Awareness to
women & disadvantaged from local NGOs
|
|
No timely
monitoring
|
|
Timely
monitoring
|
|
3
|
Effective
program by various monitoring
|
|
Less amount
approved
|
|
Provision of
collection centre at market program
|
|
4
|
More effective
due to community based project
|
|
No provision
of capacity building of farmers group
|
|
Extinction of
project time
|
|
5
|
Project
monitoring by BMC which is made from beneficiaries
|
|
No provision
of market management of agri. Product
|
|
Re project
implementation program
|
|
6
|
Inpurts are
purchased by purchasing committee (made from beneficiaries)
|
|
No continuty
of program
|
|
At least
Rs.5000.00 per person
|
|
7
|
Timely
training
|
|
No intiative
for next phase program
|
|
At least 2
years project duration
|
|
1
|
Project monitoring
by technicians and other related agents and they provide necessary
|
|
Problem in
project implentation due to less amount
|
|
Training
provided to technicians about new technology
|
|
2
|
Public audit,
project orientation which is provided the qulitative service by SPs
|
|
Short duration
|
|
Provision of
cooperative community organization to groups
|
|
3
|
Proposal
preparation through demand based
|
|
Unskilled
technicians
|
|
Signature of
BMC at bills/receipts amount provided at group account
|
|
4
|
Program
implementation is more effective by local NGOs
|
|
No provision
of organization development & sustainbility of farmers group
|
|
Contract out
with BMC or chaireman of groups
|
|
5
|
Signature
verification of BMC before the contract out
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Priority of
Local NGOs
|
|
SPs are not
intrested to provide account statement
|
|
BMC or
chairman of groups
|
|
2
|
Project
approved based on P & E, women physibility
|
|
Not caring of
beneficiaries
|
|
No timely
approved contract out
|
|
3
|
Inputs are
purchased from purchasing committee
|
|
No rights of beneficiaries
|
|
capacity
building training for farmers group
|
|
4
|
No provision
of punishment to misusers' SPs
|
|
Project
complition at fast
|
|
Long duration
|
|
5
|
|
|
No program of
capacity building
|
|
Long duration
|
|
6
|
|
|
No avaibility
of commercial based service
|
|
Verufy of new
SPs skill
|
|
7
|
|
|
Project
approved of disqualified SPs
|
|
At least Rs.
10 lakh
|
|
8
|
|
|
Not provided
demanded amount
|
|
At least 1
years project duration
|
|
9
|
|
|
Short project
duration & not to continuity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Poor and
Exclusion targeting
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Srvice
delivary for farmers group formation through P & E groups
|
|
P&E group
are not much benefited
|
|
Need to more
emphasis on P&E
|
|
2
|
Priority to
P&E for proposal evaluation
|
|
Not faith on
P&E group speech
|
|
P&E motive
|
|
3
|
Need
identification of P&E for proposal preparation]
|
|
Defict in
P&E allocated budget
|
|
SP should
support P&E with open heart
|
|
4
|
Most priority
of P&E to service delivery
|
|
Monitroing
& evaluation not in timely
|
|
Timely
monitoring
|
|
5
|
Inclusion of
P&E in decision making
|
|
No much access
of P&E due to short period
|
|
Project
duration increased
|
|
6
|
Inclusion of
women, janjati & dalit in project
|
|
No capacity
building to P&E group
|
|
Training,
visit for capacity building
|
|
7
|
|
|
As said limit
amount of Rs.10 lakh, will not received
|
|
Fund limit
should be wider
|
|
1
|
P&E are
included at the time of group formation
|
|
Monopoly of
SPs in group formation
|
|
Well being
ranking too development
|
|
2
|
Approval of
project based on P&E demand
|
|
Not much
benefited due to illiterate
|
|
Adult litracy,
awareness
|
|
3
|
Monitoring by
BMC has help satisfactory benefit
|
|
Monopoly on
BMC formation
|
|
Acivity
related to BMC strenth and P&E inclusion
|
|
4
|
BMC formed
with in beneficiaries
|
|
Lack of
awareness and not capacity building training
|
|
Need to aware
& information
|
|
5
|
Purchsing
committee formed target group
|
|
SP not
received the demended amount
|
|
More than
Rs.10 lakhs
|
|
6
|
Targeted
P&E group are participated from target group
|
|
Short period
poject not empowered the P&E
|
|
More than 1
years project duration
|
|
7
|
Project &
priority for poor
|
|
No interest
shown after completion work
|
|
follow up
program needed
|
|
1
|
Focus to
P&E, demand based program (P&E demand)
|
|
No quality
work due to timely service provided
|
|
Timely
approval & installment
|
|
2
|
To approve
according to P&E as quick
|
|
More
contribution from community has made exclusion from getting service
|
|
Community
contribution based on economic status
|
|
3
|
More marking
for remote areas' female, dalit
|
|
Less grant
amount
|
|
Rs. 10 lakhs
for 200 HH
|
|
4
|
To searching
the P&E for proposal preparation by SPs
|
|
No institution
development and capacity building activity of P&E
|
|
cooperative
registration for institution development
|
|
5
|
Support in
social work
|
|
No additional
work after irrigation facility
|
|
High value
income crop
|
|
6
|
Opportunity to evaluation the project themselves
|
|
No sufficient
support/service available
|
|
package based
|
|
7
|
Transparent to
all the P&E service delivery program of the district
|
|
Propoor of
rural area are not showing intereast to participate
|
|
Information by
local level agebcies
|
|
8
|
Sport for infrastructure
|
|
Rich people
are jealious from poor since they are getting facility
|
|
Rich people
shond participal
|
|
9
|
Support to
landless people
|
|
Difficulties
in livelihood improvement from short duration project
|
|
Long duration
|
|
10
|
In beginning,
P&E are supported first
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Poor selected
through well beginning method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Transparency, monitoring and timely support
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Proposal
preparation after disscussion in community
|
|
No program for
BMC activeness
|
|
Training to
BMC
|
|
2
|
Project
implementation based on BMC decision
|
|
No proper
discussion with BMC & SPs while implementation project
|
|
Regular
discussion with BMC & chairman of group
|
|
3
|
Made aware
through about program orientation workshop
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Priority &
support to P&E group
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Public Audit
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Labeling &
tagging to goat
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Regular
inspection & monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
BMC managed
for monitoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Regular
monitoring by APPSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Regular
monitoring by SP staff and members
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Monitoring by
BMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
SP performed
their responsibility accordingly
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
BMC
accountable for installment release and expenditure
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Material
purchased quite cheaper and of quality with BMC & SP together
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Implementation
& Input distributed in participation of BMC
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
BMC are oriented
in at time of agreement
|
|
BMC are only
awarded about budget
|
|
|
|
17
|
Discussion
with community at the time of proposal preparation
|
|
No provision
for keeping in group account allocated for group
|
|
|
|
18
|
All stockholder
called at the time of Public audit
|
|
No provision
of inter group visit/monitoring
|
|
Inter group
visit needed
|
|
19
|
Purchasing
committee format
|
|
Awarded to
best group implementation
|
|
Award required
|
|
20
|
On the spot
monitoring
|
|
No provision
to make contract with ASC
|
|
More
responcibility to ASC
|
|
21
|
Timely seed
support
|
|
No enough
technician advice & support
|
|
Full time
staff
|
|
22
|
Timely service
delivery by SP staff
|
|
No activity of
group capacity building
|
|
Long duration
training required
|
|
23
|
Timely treadle
pump installation
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Timely medicine
& vaccination support
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Hording board publicity
displayed
|
|
short project
period
|
|
|
|
26
|
One day
program orientation
|
|
No completion
of project in time due to no timely release
|
|
|
|
27
|
BMC formation,
different line agency involved in monitoring
|
|
Less budget
for implementing project to SP
|
|
|
|
28
|
Fund release
after monitoring only
|
|
BMC formed but
not actively participate
|
|
|
|
29
|
Public audit
|
|
Very less
amount disbursed while approving than proposed
|
|
|
|
30
|
Monitoring by
beneficiaries
|
|
No capacity
building & organization development for SPs
|
|
|
|
Lesson Learning Workshop of LIF Beneficiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date : 2064/4/24,28,29
|
|
Venue :
Agriculture Service Centre, Buddhi, Gotihawa, Bahadurgunj
|
|
|
|
|
Participants :
LIF Beneficiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitator : Mr.
Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repoter :
Shakti Karki
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
LIF
Process(proposal call, evaluation, project selection, awarding, fund disbursement process and
service provision to beneficiaries)
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Proposal submission
based on P&E groups' needs
|
|
Less amount to
group
|
|
|
|
2
|
Fund available
as a grant without deposit
|
|
No timely
& seasonally approved of proposal
|
|
|
|
3
|
Installment
release system on BMC recommend
|
|
Not travel
cost for group reaching to district
|
|
|
|
4
|
Improvement in
economical status
|
|
No timely
monitoring & installation release
|
|
|
|
5
|
Participation
in social & religious work
|
|
Problem in
proposal written
|
|
|
|
6
|
Monitoring of
group work by BMC
|
|
Preparing
bills & receipts
|
|
|
|
7
|
Training based
on enterprises/activity
|
|
Many visit to
office for installment release
|
|
|
|
8
|
Work based on
group interest project
|
|
No aware of
proposal format
|
|
|
|
9
|
Purchasing
committee for buying the material
|
|
No training for
proposal writing
|
|
|
|
10
|
Joint account
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Development of
participatory concept
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Service
delivery in come generation based on identification of P&E
|
|
|
|
Rs.50-60
thousands
|
|
13
|
Self need
identification
|
|
No technical
support
|
|
Technical
support
|
|
14
|
No misuse of
fund due to monitoring by community
|
|
No sustainable
work for group
|
|
Long duration
|
|
15
|
Providing
opportunity for learning through monitoring by APPSP
|
|
Short project
duration
|
|
Apporval
within one month of submision
|
|
5
|
Amount deposit
in group account
|
|
Selection
period is long
|
|
Provision of
TADA
|
|
6
|
Technical
skill development through less amount for IGA
|
|
No logistic
& Travel cost
|
|
Timely
monitoring
|
|
7
|
Work
efficiency & awareness incensement
|
|
No budget
based on work plan
|
|
In two
installment
|
|
8
|
Development in
participatory concept
|
|
Late in
monitoring
|
|
Incresement of
amount
|
|
9
|
Effective
project execution due to self evaluation
|
|
Problem in
project conductance by many monitoring
|
|
|
|
10
|
Getting
opportunity by self emerged group as other existing group
|
|
Not technical
support from govt. agency
|
|
|
|
|
Fund demand
based on group interest
|
|
Not sufficient
for all the group member for minimum amount
|
|
|
|
1
|
Timely
approval of project which is proposed by group
|
|
Input support
but not technical support
|
|
Technical
staffs
|
|
2
|
Poor, Dalit
group are driven by group itself
|
|
Not sufficient
for completing work activity by Rs.25000
|
|
Rs.50-60
thousands
|
|
3
|
Many times
monitoring
|
|
Not expected
outcome in short duration
|
|
At least one
year
|
|
4
|
Various castes
are sitting together
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Fund mobilization
by community and contribution as labor and cash
|
|
Regular
training activity
|
|
Need base
training
|
|
6
|
Participation
of male, female & ethnic caste
|
|
Feeling complexity
due to no interest of staff
|
|
Provision for
allowances
|
|
7
|
|
|
Not budget
sufficient for goat activity, No participation in purchasing committee
|
|
Rs. 3000.00
for one goat, Inclusive purchase committe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Poor and
Exclusion targeting
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
Affiliated in
group
|
|
Lack of
awareness to P&E
|
|
|
|
2
|
Prority to
P&E Women in proposal evaluation.
|
|
Lack of
education to P&E.
|
|
|
|
3
|
Self decision
and freedom to for purchasing the materials.
|
|
Less
Accessibility.
|
|
|
|
4
|
Opportunity for account operation.
|
|
Not
association of P&E in farmers group.
|
|
|
|
5
|
Transparent
when women & Dalit are in executive committee.
|
|
no insolvent institution
development activities.
|
|
|
|
6
|
Direct service
delivery to P&E women Group.
|
|
Not sufficient
25000/
|
|
Must one lakh
realese.
|
|
7
|
better
opportunity to IGA for self reliance from grant.
|
|
Not support
for group mobilization.
|
|
|
|
8
|
Self reliance
to P&E women helps in full filling the donor objectives.
|
|
Not travel allowance
for person visiting in district.
|
|
|
|
1
|
information
from local level to district.
|
|
Lack of
communication facilities.
|
|
|
|
2
|
Proposal
submission according to group objectives from laborious and honest
|
|
|
|
Awareness
creation.
|
|
3
|
Program transparent.
|
|
Not training
for capacity building.
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
No information
for group meeting & no casing for meeting.
|
|
2 installment.
|
|
5
|
Better selection
process.
|
|
Installment release
without proper exercise.
|
|
|
|
6
|
Training
provided.
|
|
No knowledge
for quality of seed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No timely
information by DADO& DLSO staff regarding service & support.
|
|
|
|
1
|
priority to
P&E Dalit, women in group formation.
|
|
Difficult to
propor & illiterate in group to involve in group.
|
|
Awareness
creation
|
|
2
|
Women in veil
are also involved in group.
|
|
No provision
for technical staff.
|
|
provision for
technical staff.
|
|
3
|
less
possibility to misuse of funded to account payee check operation system.
|
|
No provision
of staff support in preparing proposal , Bills and receipts.
|
|
Facilition for
my agency or sttaffs.
|
|
4
|
Allocated
approved amount project implementation by collective decision based on
discussion.
|
|
Lengthy and
costly poor administration for to illiterate people.
|
|
Payment bassed
on group application in 2 installment.
|
|
5
|
Support in
livelihood of P&E from approved budget.
|
|
In sufficiency
for all members for 25000/
|
|
Rs.75000/-
|
|
6
|
Involvement up
P&E dalit women in BMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
P& E have
benefited from APPSP so it needs to extension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ques
|
Transparency,
monitoring and timely support
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N
|
Strength
|
Priority
|
Weakness
|
Priority
|
Recommended Action for weakness
|
|
1
|
project Board
displayed.
|
|
No timely
monitoring
|
|
|
|
2
|
Project implemented
based on BMC decision awareness creation on project to all members.
|
|
Problem in
project implementation.
|
|
|
|
3
|
Training to
group members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
awareness
creation on project to all members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Group Account
operating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Funded release
based on BMC decision.
|
|
No aware while
expending amount
|
|
Bill settlement
based on group decision.
|
|
7
|
Lebeling on
materials like T.P. & sprayers.
|
|
No capable of
BMC.
|
|
Training to
BMC.
|
|
8
|
Information on
grant provided by APPSP & their expenditure process.
|
|
No reguler
meeting of group.
|
|
Support on
socialmobilization.
|
|
9
|
BMC are called
in DSU at the time of approval
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Expenditure
based on Group decisin
|
|
|
|
awareness
creation.
|
|
11
|
Transparency
in community through Board
|
|
Not awarness
creation due to uneducated.
|
|
Necessary made
after the decisin from all the farmers
|
|
12
|
Proper
monitoring of project and obsered kenly
|
|
Monopolying
group with out decisin through all …..
|
|
Orientation in beginning
|
|
13
|
Project
approval information through notice, letter
|
|
No orentation
after proposa approved.
|
|
impower BMC
activing.
|
|
14
|
MBC called in
DSU & made awared regarding project.
|
|
No time to
time training to BMC for capicity building.
|
|
staff
mobilization from DADO DLSO
|
|
15
|
|
|
No provision
for sending technical staff in the group.
|
|
sufficins
amount available
|
|
16
|
|
|
No notice
about project buject due to less amount.
|
|
|
|
19
|
Timely Work
|
|
weak BMC
|
|
Capacity
building of BMC
|
|
20
|
BMC submit the
report work performance
|
|
No timely
monitoring
|
|
Timely
monitoring
|
|
21
|
Timely
monitoring by various stakholders.
|
|
no provision
for punishment to group.
|
|
Punishment
|
|
22
|
On the spot
monitoring.
|
|
No provision
for award to good work.
|
|
Award
|
|
23
|
|
|
No monitoring
by technical time to time
|
|
Technicians
provide
|
|
24
|
Monitoring By
BMC.
|
|
Evaluation by
monmitoring person.
|
|
Joing
monitoring field
|
|
25
|
On the spot
technical monitoring from District
|
|
Difficult in
project monitoring due to inactive BMC
|
|
Training to
BMC
|
|
26
|
Very useful
due to proposal evaluation system
|
|
BMC are
relative baredformed.
|
|
Should be
inclusion
|
|
27
|
25000 flow
through group
|
|
Not satisfy
25000
|
|
|
|
28
|
For
installation of T.P. 50' Pipe made available.
|
|
Expansion due
to less amount.
|
|
|
|
29
|
Amount
allocation for veg. Production.
|
|
No timely
monitoring
|
|
|
|
30
|
Amount for
pesticide.
|
|
Short period
project
|
|
|
|
31
|
Verification
by all the member
|
|
Many times
called in district
|
|
|
|
32
|
Timely work
done .
|
|
No sufficant
amount according to Programm.
|
|
two
installment payment
|
|
33
|
DADO stuff
given importance of APPSP which disscussion in group.
|
|
No timely
Budgect system
|
|
Timely Budgect
release
|
|
34
|
Timely bill
settlement.
|
|
No project
implementation as per time table
|
|
Accordint to
time table
|
|
35
|
Concerned
office support through media.
|
|
Not contact
with office after complete of payes.
|
|
Timely
monitoring, and settlement.
|
|
36
|
Supported by
bringing project in time.
|
|
Short duration
according to project nature.
|
|
Timely settlement
|
|
37
|
|
|
Not addational
support to make success to fail project.
|
|
Timely settlement
|
|
38
|
Poor, Dalit,
Diasble Disadvantage group women have been supported this program.
|
|
No timely bill
settlement.
|
|
Extension of
APPSP Time
|
29. Other
Activities
|
7.Other
activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N0.
|
Activities
|
When
|
How
many
|
Major
out comes
|
|
7.1
|
Service
providers Workshop
|
2061/62,63/64
and2064/65
|
3
|
Review
of project periodical progress and rectification project in time.
|
|
7.2
|
SED
|
(9th
and 10th August2008
|
2
|
18 DADC members, 11 political parties and 19
SPs members were actively participated and live discussion ere made. APPSP is
transparent and effective to p&E group
|
|
7.3
|
BMC
monitoring
|
|
Many
times
|
|
|
7.4
|
DMC
monitoring
|
5th
august,08
|
1
|
Follow
up for extension of APPSP to concerned department and ministry.
|
|
7.5
|
Exchange
Visits
|
|
|
not
conducted
|
|
7.6
|
Public
Auditing
|
|
62
|
Verification
of Approved budget and transparency maintained.
|
|
7.7
|
LIF
awareness
|
2061/62
|
1
|
|
|
7.8
|
Any
other activities completed in the district.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEC
meeting
|
|
|
Situation
up dated and necessary measure taken in time in insurgency.
|
|
|
Political
parties meeting
|
|
|
|
MAPS,
PHOTOS &
PAPER CUTTINING
6\o'j]n tyf kDk;]6 kl/of]hgfsf]
:ynut cg'udg
|
|
|
|
INVENTORY, REGISTER,
REPORTS/ DOCUMENTS, FILES AND BOOK/ BOOKLETS
|
|
APPSP DSU
Equipment/Furniture Register Up_to_date
|
Ref. No.
|
Item
|
Make
& Model
|
Type
|
Serial
N0.
|
Date
Rec'd
|
Purchase
Price
|
Location
|
Disposal
|
|
1
|
Table Fan
|
Khetan
|
|
APPSP/E1
|
20 Jan
'05
|
2500
|
DSU Room
|
To
|
Date
|
Authorized
|
|
2
|
Room Heater Fan
|
Kothari
|
|
APPSP/E2
|
28 Jan
'05
|
1100
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Bicycle
|
Hercules/Ranger
|
|
APPSP/E3
|
28
Jan '05
|
4900
|
Messenger
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Computer CPU
|
Hp/Compaq
|
|
APPSP/E4
|
28
Jan '05
|
Not
Known
|
PA Room
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Monitor
|
hp5500
|
|
APPSP/E5
|
28
Jan '05
|
Not
Known
|
PA Room
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Smarts UPS
|
APC
|
|
APPSP/E6
|
28
Jan '05
|
Not
Known
|
PA Room
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Calculator
|
Casio
|
|
APPSP/E7
|
28
Jan '05
|
350
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
Not
working
|
|
8
|
Calculator
|
Casio
|
JJ-120
|
APPSP/E8
|
28
Jan '05
|
650
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Thermo Flask
|
Chinese/Air
pot
|
|
APPSP/E9
|
28 May
'05
|
1050
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Computer Printer
|
Laser
1160
|
Hp
|
APPSP/E10
|
15
Apr '05
|
Not Known
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Motorbike 60-0-4
|
YBX
|
YAMAHA
|
APPSP/E11
|
16th
Apr '05
|
Not
Known
|
DPA
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Motorbike 60-0-3
|
YBX
|
YAMAHA
|
APPSP/E12
|
16th
Apr '05
|
Not
Known
|
DPC
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Helmet 4 Pcs
|
Index
|
|
APPSP/E13
|
16th
Apr '05
|
Not
Known
|
DPA/DPC
|
|
|
1 lost
|
|
15
|
Camera
|
Sony
|
Digital
|
APPSP/E14
|
28th
Oct.2005
|
not known
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Fan
|
SEC
|
Table
|
APPSP/E15
|
13th
Nov.2005
|
1050.00
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Board map
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/F26
|
11th
Dec.2005
|
750.00
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Telephone
|
Pan phone
|
|
APPSP/E16
|
13th
Sep.2006
|
500.00
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Monochrome Laser MFP
|
4 in 1
|
|
APPSP/E17
|
22nd
Sep.2006
|
not known
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Sofa
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/F27
|
5th
Jan. 2007
|
5900.00
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Book Cabinet
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/F28
|
5th
Jan. 2007
|
5500.00
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Revolving Chair
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/F29
|
|
4500.00
|
DPC
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Bicycle
|
Lady bard
|
|
APPSP/E18
|
5th
Jan. 2007
|
4700.00
|
PA
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Computer Table
|
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F19
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
3600.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Office Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F20
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
5000.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
Revolving Chair
|
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F21
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
3800.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F22
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F28
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F29
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F30
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F31
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
Folding Chair
|
Steel
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F32
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
675.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
PVC Carpet 30mt.@120.00
|
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F34
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
3600.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
Soft Board
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F23
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
1000.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
White Board
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F24
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
1000.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
T-Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F25
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
1000.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
T-Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F26
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
1000.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F27
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
700.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F34
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
700.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/DADO/F35
|
6th
Dec.2007
|
700.00
|
DADO
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
Telephone Line
|
07560557
|
|
07560557
|
|
|
DSU
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F1
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F2
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F3
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F4
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F5
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F6
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F7
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F8
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F9
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
Plastic
Chair
|
Dolphin
|
|
APPSP/F10
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
375
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
Steel
Cupboard
|
Godrej
|
|
APPSP/F11
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
4100
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
Computer
Table
|
Taiwan
|
|
APPSP/12
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
4200
|
DPA Room
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
Revolving
Chair
|
Taiwan
|
|
APPSP/13
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
3700
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
Revolving
Chair
|
Nepali
|
|
APPSP/14
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
2000
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
T/Table
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/15
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
800
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
Wall Rack
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/16
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
900
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
Wall Rack
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/17
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
900
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
Wall Rack
|
Wooden
|
|
APPSP/18
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
900
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
Bench
|
|
|
APPSP/19
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
800
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
T/ Table
|
|
|
APPSP/20
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
1000
|
DPA Room
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
Office
Table
|
|
|
APPSP/21
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
3100
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
White
Board
|
|
|
APPSP/22
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
450
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
White
Board
|
|
|
APPSP/23
|
28 Jan.
'05
|
450
|
DADO Room
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
Soft
Board
|
|
|
APPSP/24
|
15 Feb
'05
|
800
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
White
Board
|
|
|
APPSP/25
|
15 Feb
'05
|
300
|
DSU Room
|
|
|
|
List of Registers, Report/ documents and files
|
SNO
|
Items
|
Qnty
|
|
A
|
Register
|
|
|
1
|
Entry
|
1
|
|
2
|
Dispatch
|
1
|
|
3
|
DEF
proposal Submission
|
1
|
|
4
|
LiF
proposal submission
|
1
|
|
5
|
DSU
|
2
|
|
6
|
TSC
|
1
|
|
7
|
Leadger no1
A
|
1
|
|
8
|
Leadger No2
B
|
1
|
|
9
|
Visitor
|
1
|
|
10
|
SP
coordination meeting
|
1
|
|
11
|
VIP
personnel/ activity
|
1
|
|
12
|
Proposal
returning
|
1
|
|
13
|
Inventory
|
1
|
|
14
|
LLW
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
Report / Document
|
|
|
1
|
Monthly,
trimester and annual progress NPC 2061-65
|
1/1
|
|
2
|
SP workshop
proceedings61-64, 64-65 in CSU
|
1/1
|
|
3
|
Important
document
(SP member
ship profile, DEF proposal model, PA guide line, Project implN guide line ,
FG bylaws 2,Animal insurance regulation, VDC & tole profile, Fund disbursement
bsed on VDC of DADF, Mid term review report, DADF impact report, Dist Fact sheet, dist profile of kapil,
Guideline od progress report revised DADF bylaws)
|
1/1
|
|
4
|
DADF by
laws ang guide line revised
|
1/1
|
|
5
|
Budget
detail of LIF/DEF 62-65
|
1/1
|
|
6
|
Financial
Norms for DADF implementation
|
1
|
|
7
|
Decentralized
W/s Proceeding
|
1
|
|
8
|
LLW report
|
1
|
|
9
|
Annual
report 061-64
|
1/1
|
|
10
|
Monitoring
report 061-65
|
1/1
|
|
11
|
DEF/ LIF
beneficiaries profile061-64
|
1/1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
Files
|
|
|
1
|
Incoming
line agencies
|
1
|
|
2
|
Incoming CSu
|
1
|
|
3
|
Program
format
|
1
|
|
4
|
Formats
|
1
|
|
5
|
LIF
progress report
|
1
|
|
6
|
SP NGO
progress report
|
1
|
|
7
|
Letter to
CSU
|
1
|
|
8
|
Office Copy
|
1
|
|
9
|
Miscellaneous
|
1
|
|
10
|
APPSP
material
|
1
|
|
11
|
Agreement
paper
|
1
|
|
12
|
Annual
program
|
1
|
|
13
|
BTOR
|
1
|
|
14
|
Publications
of kapilvastu and other district
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
D
|
Books/
booklets
|
|
|
|
APPSP guide
line 1234
|
1
|
|
1
|
Periodical
plan DDC
|
1
|
|
2
|
Puspanjali
|
|
|
3
|
CLC
sustainability
|
1
|
|
4
|
Public
Audit
|
1
|
|
5
|
Citzen
charter
|
1
|
|
6
|
Information
of Kapilvstu DDC
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Clothed
pack proposal DEF/LIF awarded nd rejected
|
11
|
STAFFS DETAIL
|
DSU office staff
name:
|
|
S.N0.
|
Name
|
Position
|
|
1
|
Mr.
Makbool Ali
|
DPC
|
|
2
|
Mr.
Shree Bhagawan Thakur
|
DPA
|
|
3
|
Mrs.
Shakti Karki
|
PA
|
|
4
|
Mr.
Buddhi Sagar Bhattrai
|
Messenger
|
|
DADO staff name:
|
|
S.N0.
|
name
|
Position
|
|
1
|
Khursed
A Khan
|
F.SADO
|
|
2
|
Makbool
Ali
|
Planning
Officer
|
|
3
|
Vishnu
kafle
|
Crop
Saving Officer
|
|
4
|
Vishnu
Raj Tandan
|
Ag.
Extension Officer
|
|
5
|
Madhusudhan
Upadhya
|
Ag.
Extension Officer
|
|
6
|
Ram
Narayan Upadhyay
|
Fish
Dev. Officer
|
|
7
|
Abdul
Kyum
|
Planning
Officer
|
|
8
|
Dilip
Kumar Singh
|
Crop
Dev. Officer
|
|
9
|
Chaturbhuji
Chaudhari
|
horticulture
Officer
|
|
10
|
Pancham
Yadav
|
Ag.
Extension Officer
|
|
11
|
Rajendra
Pd. Chaudhari
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
12
|
Ram
Krishna Kahar
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
13
|
Mohar
Ali
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
14
|
Bhakta
Bd. Rayamajhi
|
Accountent
|
|
15
|
Dhani
Ram Acharya
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
16
|
Shivalal
Gupta
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
17
|
Tikaram
Pokhrel
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
18
|
Bishnu
Pd. Chaudhari
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
19
|
Santosh
Kumar Bhusal
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
20
|
Youwaraja
Upadhyaya
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
21
|
Bedu
Pd. Upadhyaya
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
22
|
Jit
Ram Pd Chaudhari
|
Technical
Assistant
|
|
23
|
Ram
Kuber Yadav
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
24
|
Ramkeshor
Yadav
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
25
|
Nandalal
Gupta
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
26
|
Vishwa
Raj Yagle
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
27
|
Surya
Bd. Regmi
|
Storkeeper
|
|
28
|
Bhagawat
Pd. Yadav
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
29
|
Krishna Pd. Khanal
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
30
|
Shivalal
Ghimire
|
J.Technical
Assistant
|
|
31
|
Hem
Bd. Thapa
|
Driver
|
|
32
|
Ram
Samujha Kahar
|
Peon
|
|
33
|
Shivanarayan
Kahar
|
Peon
|
|
34
|
Shailesh
Pathak
|
Peon
|
|
35
|
Ravendra
Chaube
|
Peon
|
|
36
|
Aaitabari
Chaudhari
|
Peon
|
|
37
|
Pravunath
Kurmi
|
Peon
|
|
38
|
Chhedi
Pd. Kurmi
|
Peon
|
|
39
|
Ghanshyam
Kurmi
|
Peon
|
|
40
|
Dukhram
Loniya
|
Peon
|
|
41
|
Balji
Kurmi
|
Peon
|
|
42
|
Ram
Krishna Chaudhari
|
Peon
|
|
43
|
Dhanai
Ahir
|
Peon
|
|
44
|
Radheshyam
Bari
|
Peon
|
|
45
|
Shiva
Pd. Yadav
|
Peon
|
|
|
|
|
|
DLSO office staff
name:
|
|
S.N0.
|
name
|
Position
|
|
1
|
Dr.Pradeep
Sharma
|
LSO
|
|
2
|
Laxmanlal
Srivastav
|
LST
|
|
3
|
Abdul
Salam
|
LST
|
|
4
|
Iswar
Chandra Chaudhari
|
AHT
|
|
5
|
krishna
Pd. Bhattarai
|
LST
|
|
6
|
Ram
Bilas Yadav
|
AHT
|
|
7
|
Mahendra
Prakas Bhusal
|
Accountent
|
|
8
|
Bushnu
Pd. Murau
|
LST
|
|
9
|
Bechan
Pd. Chaudhari
|
LST
|
|
10
|
Giriraj
Poudel
|
AHT
|
|
11
|
Nandakishwar
Upadhyaya
|
AHT
|
|
12
|
Gopal
Pd. Kurmi
|
LST
|
|
13
|
Shiva
Pd. Subedi
|
Store
Keeper
|
|
14
|
Ram
Sahaya harijan
|
JAHT
|
|
15
|
Ashyarya
Acharya
|
OJT
|
|
16
|
Dhurba
Raj Gyawali
|
JAHT
|
|
17
|
Dilliraj
Marasini
|
JAHT
|
|
18
|
Asarphi
Yadav
|
JAHT
|
|
19
|
Sanjay
Kumar Saha
|
JLST
|
|
20
|
Vijay
Dhakal
|
JLST
|
|
21
|
Khim
Bd. Tandan
|
JLST
|
|
22
|
Ram
Pd. Adikari
|
JAHT
|
|
23
|
Deviram
Achary
|
JAHT
|
|
24
|
Rudal
Pd. yadav
|
JAHT
|
|
25
|
Sita
Chhetri
|
JAHT
|
|
26
|
Ram
Bikram Pandey
|
Peon
|
|
27
|
Sharmaraj
Kohar
|
Peon
|
|
28
|
Kanhaiya
Raidas
|
Driver
|
|
29
|
Tribhuwan
Pd. Kohar
|
Peon
|
|
30
|
Om Prakash Pandey
|
Peon
|
|
31
|
Churamani
Ghimire
|
Peon
|
|
32
|
Khumananda
Khanal
|
Peon
|
|
33
|
Mohan
Lal Neupane
|
Peon
|
|
34
|
Narayan
Pd. Panthi
|
Peon
|
|
35
|
Ram
Milan Kahar
|
Peon
|
|
36
|
Baljit
Pasi
|
Peon
|
|
37
|
Tirath
Kahar
|
Peon
|
|
38
|
Santaram
Yadav
|
Peon
|
|
39
|
Surendra
Pd. Chaudhari
|
Peon
|
|
40
|
Chhabilal
Pokhrel
|
Peon
|
|
41
|
Ashok
Kumar Mishra
|
Peon
|
|
42
|
Dharma
Raj Neupane
|
Peon
|
|
43
|
Santaram
Badhai
|
Peon
|
|
|
DDC
Staffs
|
|
