खेतबारी Khetbari: District Programme Completion Report 2065, APPSP

Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Programme (APPSP),

District Support Unit, Kapilvastu

District Program Completion Report, 2065

Prepared by: Shree Bhagavan Thakur

District Programme Advisor

Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program

District Program Completion Report

2065

Submitted by: Shree Bhagavan Thakur, DPA

APPSP,

District Support Unit

Kapilvastu

Submitted to: APPSP, CSU, and Plaza building Kathmandu.
Acknowledgement

The district project completion report 2064-65 is a part of DSU activity for submitting to APPSP, CSU Kathmandu, prepared for the support of M&E purpose. We would like to acknowledge the APPSP/CSU Kathmandu inspired us to write this annual report. To write this report, we would like to acknowledge with gratitude, Dr. Indrakant Jha (Acting Program Manager) and Mr Christopher Floyd (Program Advisor) who have given the great opportunity. We would like to express acknowledge to ex Program Manger, Program Advisor Deputy and Program Manager. We also acknowledge Mr. P.B. Shakya (Decentralized Service Delivery Specialist), Mr. Ramesh Vishta (Monitoring and evaluation specialist) and Mrs. Sangita Khadaka (Social Inclusion specialist) who have encouraged writing this report.

Likewise, we would like to great fully acknowledge Mr. Ram Mani Paudyal (RLSO, Bharahawa cluster) who suggested & supported timely, concrete and effectively. We are particularly grateful to Mr. Damodar Bhandari (LDO) for their kind cooperation and positive support during program implementation. We also thank to all staff of DADO and DLSO, Kapilvastu (in past and recently available, who helped in program implementation. We would like to special thanks to all TSC, DADC and DDC members, who have given concrete and fair decision in project evaluation and selection. We also hearty acknowledge all the political parties, press representative, journalist, civil society, in project monitoring, supporting directly and indirectly.

We would acknowledge all the SPs. as they have successfully completed the projects and contributed in achieving the purpose of the program with their efforts, skills and resources. Like wise, we also acknowledge to all the farmers groups for active participation. The agro vets, hard wares, skilled labour and other service delivery agents are also equally acknowledged. We acknowledge the helped rendered by Mrs. Shakti Karki Gupta (Program Assistant) for her skilful typing, data entry and day to day support. Last but not least, we acknowledge Mr. Buddhi Sagar Bhattarai for his help in DSu.

We would be happy if this report would fulfil the needs of the M&E purpose of APPSP/CSU. We also apologize for any mistakes in preparing this report.

Abstract

Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program (APPSP) is five year program supported by DFID and MOAC of Govt. of Nepal from F.Y 2061-62 with the goal of Livelihood Improvement of Rural People through establishment of DADF for expansion of agriculture Service delivery by DEF & LIF projects. Interest of the program is to increase the income of poor & excluded farming community (poor producers, agricultural worker and consumers) towards livelihood improvement and poverty reduction.

During 4 years period (FY.2061/62 to 2064/65), this program has made a substantial achievements in area of inclusion of poor & excluded family of remote area in the agricultural activity through DEF and or LIF projects.

Till now a total of 80 DEF & 322 LIF projects have been implemented with coverage of 74 VDCs (96%) of the district. Among all 80 DEF & 277 LIF projects have been completed successfully with receiving all the installments. There are only 45 LIF projects have not been completed with receiving all the installments due to not timely settlements, lack of fund, dispute in groups and lack of information and awareness of proper process by the groups. For completion of LIF projects various efforts have been made through information.

Among 72,932 HHs of the district, till this period program has been succeeded to benefit of 18583 HHs (25%) from 900 farmers groups of both Agricultural (462) , Livestock (224) and mixed type (214). Among the total households, 52% female, 33% Dalit, 25% disadvantaged non dalit, 15% disadvantaged Janjati, 9 % religious minorities and Advantaged Janjati are very minimum under benefit. The total of 84% of poor ( food sufficiency of less than 9 months) beneficiaries have been covered by this program in this district.

More no of projects were of vegetable production with irrigation and goat keeping type. There are also other different types of project with few in number i.e. Bee keeping, Banana farming, fish farming, pig rearing, TPS potato, mush room, Poultry, Cattle shed floor construction, Vegetable market shed construction, irrigation , Chilling vat and buffalo rearing, mushroom, turmeric farming and off seasonal onion production.

For irrigation of small holding land, Treadle pumps, tube well, Diesel pump sets, electric motors have been supported to the projects. There are constructed of dam, check dam have been constructed and farmers are benefiting.

Group farmers have been benefited with getting various type of trainings, timely support of improved inputs (seeds, suckers, pesticides, micronutrients, goat, piglets, he goats, buffalo bull, bee hive and colony) and appropriate tools and implements (sprayer tank, bee veil, honey extractor, water cane, weighing balance, vegetable carrying carts, milk canes, chilling vats set etc. They have received technical support by technicians time to time for technical back stopping.

There were more no. of NGOs (52) are involved in DEF projects as SPs, followed by cooperative (15) & CBOs (9). One year duration of projects (39) were more in number than 6 month period (38), 9 month period (2) and only one projects of 18 month under DEF but all LIF projects are of 6 month duration.

All DEF & LIF projects have mainly focused on skill development through training, technical back stopping & group mobilization, income generation; irrigation support improved and sustainable production of Agriculture & livestock towards poverty reduction and realization of good governance of remote rural poor through decentralized service delivery mechanism.

DSU has facilitated 8 times proposal evaluation by TSC, 14 times DADC meeting, 79 times in DEF/ LIF BMC meeting, 9 times SP coordination meeting, 3 times SP workshop, participated in line agencies and other project meeting workshop.

A total of 770 times DEF /LIF on the spot field monitoring have been don e by a multi sect oral team for effective implementation of the program. Sixty two project orientation and 61 public audits have been organized by SPs.

A total of NRs.48166 thousands had been approved for expenditure of DADF project implementation, policy analysis, SP workshop and dissemination & consultation including 5 % management cost. But only Rs. 41898 (86.98%) amount of released, Rs. 39888 (82.81%) amount have been expended for DADF project implementation.

This program made awareness to rural, remote, poor & excluded group regarding adoption of new agriculture technology, improved seed & breed of livestock for income generating activities. The Program helped to increase the area under irrigation for production of different crops al around the year and helped to empower local NGO, co-operative, CBOs and Farmers groups. By this effect some times P&E voice heard for their rights. The production of green vegetable & its consumption and goat's population has been increasing. Seasonal export of vegetable can see in border instead of importing in past. Utilization of local skill & resources has been increasing and agricultural area is diversifying with this program in the district. It has also helped peace building and maintaining good governance in society through transparency, neutrality and participatory works. P&E groups of the out side project area have realized support with the program and started seeking information for receiving the projects.

In spite of remarkable achievement, this program has faced few problems of untimely proposal evaluation & contract out due to long process, untimely budget release of approved amount, timely monitoring due to political situation, and low capacity of SPs and F.Gs, insufficient budget for per DEF/LIF, lack of technical support to LIF, no BMC empowerment activity, no field verification mechanism, no assurance of continuity of program, which effect in project implementation & achieving goal and objectives smoothly.

For the purpose of knowing the strength, weakness, opportunity and threats of the program 9 lesson learning workshop have been organized at different level at various location.

Abbreviation

AJ : Advantaged janjati

APP : Agriculture Perspective Plan

APPSP : Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program

BMC : Beneficiaries Monitoring Committee

CBO : Community based organization

CDO : Chief District Officer

CSU : Central Support Unit

DADC : District Agriculture Development Committee

DADF : District Agriculture Development Fund

DADO : District Agriculture Development Office

DDC : District Development Committee

DDF : District Development Fund

DEF : District Extension Fund

DFID : Department for International Development

DJ : Disadvantaged janjati

DLSO : District Livestock Service Office

DMC : District Monitoring Committee

DND : Dis. advantaged non-dalit

DOA : Directorate of Agriculture

DPA : District Program Advisor

DPC : District Program Coordinator

D PM : Deputy Program Manager

DSU : District Support Unit

DTO : District Treasury Office

FG : Farmers Groups

FY : Fiscal Year

GIS : Geographical Information System

IGA : Income Generating Activity

JT : Junior Technician

JTA : Junior Technical Assistant

LDO : Local Development Officer

LFP : Livelihood Forest Program

LIF : Local Initiative Fund

LLW : Lesson Learning Workshop

M&E : Monitoring & Evaluation

MOAC : Ministry of Agriculture & Cooperative

NGO : Non-governmental Organization

PA : Program Advisor, Public Audit

PM : Program Manager

RLSO : Regional Liaison Support Officer

RM : Religious Minorities

RSU : Regional Support Unit

SAGA : Social and Geographical Audit

SMS : Subject Matter Specialist

SP : Service provider

TMC : Technical Monitoring Committee

TSC : Technical Sub-committee

UC : Upper caste

VDC : Village Development Committee

VCA : Value Chain Approach

WDO : Women Development Office

Part :1

District Program Completion Report

1. District Brief

Kapilvastu district lies in the Western Development Region of Nepal with an area of 1738 square km. It extends from 27⁰25’ to 27⁰84’ north latitude and lies between to 82⁰75’ to 83⁰ 14’ east longitudes. The district of Kapilvastu is bordered by Rupendehi in the east, Dang and Balrampur district of India on west, Arghakhanchi and Dang on the north and India on south. The district headquarter is Taulihawa. The district has 77 Village Development Committees (VDC) & 1 municipality. Geographically, more than 3 percent of the area is covered by hills, 88 percent by Siwalik plains and remaining 9 percent by Plateau. The altitude ranges from 90 meters to 824 meters from msl.(mean sea local) . The district extends 48 km in length & 34 km in breadth. Total literacy rate of the population is 41.45 but female's is only 29.3 percent.

1.1 Demography

Total number of households, total population, male and female population:

The total population of the district is 4,81,976 residing in 72,932 households and comprising of 2,47,875 males and 2,34,101 females. Population is growing at a rate of 2.6 percent per annum. Population density is 277 persons per sq km. ( source: 13th District Development Plan, 2064/65)

Table:1

Population by social groups and their respective percentage.

Details

Dalit

Disadvantage Non Dalit

Disadvantage Janjati

Advantage Janjati

Religious Minority

BCT

Population

86755

130326

80490

1928

93504

87237

Percentage

27.4

16.7

0.4

19.4

18.1

BCT= Bahun. Chhetri, Thakuri

1.2 Agricultural Situation

Food sufficiency; is the district food sufficient?; Area and production of major crops; Land use distribution; area under irrigation; agriculture infrastructure; market center, agriculture road, major pocket areas.

The total household of the district is 72,932 among those 77.65% of the household depend on agriculture. There are 95.3% of the people live in rural areas.

Total area of the district is 1, 73,800 hectares, cultivable land is 83,000 hectares (47.75%) and cultivated land is 61,000 hectares (73.00% of the cultivable land). Total irrigated area of the district is 29% only. The district keeps 16^th position in the country in food supply.

Table:2

Land use pattern

S.N.	Detail	Unit	Area	Percentage
1	Total Area	Ha	173800
2	Cultivatable Land	Ha	83000	47.75 %
3	Cultivated khet land	Ha	61000	73.50 %
4	Upland	Ha	22000
5	Irrigated All-round the year	Ha	24300	40 %
6	Un irrigated area	Ha	58700
7	Seasonal irrigation	Ha	36700	60 %
8	Forest	Ha	73312
9	Grazing land	Ha	4400
10	Lakes and Pond	Ha	398
11	Others	Ha	6089

Source: Annual Progress Report, 2062-63, DADO Kapilvastu.

Table :3

Situation of different crops Area, Production & productivity

S.N.	Crops Name	Area (Hectors)	Area (Metric Ton)	Productivity Mt/Ha
1	Rice	69216	171655	2.74
2	Wheat	27560	52364	1.9
3	Maize	1200	2400	2
4	Pulses	9700	6062.5	0.63
5	Oil seed	3600	2347	0.65
6	Sugarcane	5710	274080	48
7	Potato	1985	21636	10.9
8	Honey		5
9	Mushroom		5
10	Vegetable
10.1	Off-seasonal	550	8250	15
10.2	Seasonal	1850	26825	14.5
11	Fruits
11.1	Banana	75
11.2	Mango	1613

Source: Annual Progress Report, 2062-63, DADO Kapilvastu.

Total fish ponds are 1335 covering 303 hectare total water shed area and total production of fish is 690 tones with involvement of 510 fish farmers of 18 groups. There are 4 l big lakes covering 74 hectares are present in the district.

Table :4

Situation of Animal based products in Kapilvastu of F.Y.2061-62

S.N.	Detail	Unit	Quantity
1	Milk Production	Mt.	20579.27
2	Meat Production	Mt.	3822.64
3	Egg Production	No.	3572833
4	Wool Production	Mt.	4.46

Source: Annual Progress Report, 2061-62, DADO, Kapilvastu.

There are 150.27 km. black pitch road,402.19 km.gravel and777.2 km earthern road in the district. There are 34 weekly and bi- weekly market/ hattia in the district for marketing the agriculture products. Two vegetable collection centers Gotihawa and Bedauli are established in the district abu nt in function. There are 12 major irrigation projects are covering 5590 hectare of land under irrigation.

Agriculture faces a great challenge of feeding some 481976 people in Kapilvastu district and it has remained basically subsistence-oriented with lower productivity. Of the total population of the district 133,838 of male population and 87,835 of female population are economically active and 44,131 of male and 79,162 of female are economically inactive. With 84 percent of population engaged in agriculture Therefore, agriculture sector is pivotal for any attempt to increase incomes, alleviate widespread poverty and uplift living standards of this district. The non-agriculture occupation/livelihood is limited only to 2,14072 of the population, of which 393 is in Legislators/Senior, Officials, 6,297 is in Prof./Semi Prof./Tech Workers, 125,684 is in Farm, Fishing and Forestry Worker, 1,846 is in Prod. Labor workers and 133,684rest are in others and not stated.

For the service delivery and necessary support of farmers, there are four Agriculture Service Centers (ASC) under District Agriculture Development Office and 4 Livestock Service Centers and 11 Sub Livestock Service Centers under District Livestock Service Office in different location of the district. In addition 3 farmers contact center have been managed by DADO. There are 78 fertilizer and pesticide traders and agrovets for providing agri- inputs. Four fish hatchery (nursery) are available for supplying and hatchling and fingerling. There are one bee keeping resource center and 2 bee keeping co-operatives in the district.

There are 3 Agriculture Development banks, 5 small farmer development project, 1 banking office and 2 National commercial banks are available for financial investment. There are 123 various types of registered co-operatives promoted by District co-operative Divisional Office, Women Development Office and others for easy service of the farmers.

There are more than 350 numbers of Non-Governmental Organizations of various purposes, have been registered in District Administrative Office.

1.3 Problems and Issues of Kapilvastu

(According to Five Year Periodic Plan of DDC, Kapilvastu; 2059)

Most of the farmers of the district are depend on subsistence or traditional farming system, so that there is low income, more production cost, low production and productivity. It results in direct negative impact, effect in poverty alleviation.
Though, agriculture is inherent occupation of the district; there is no proper upgrading in commercial farming system due to inadequate training, literacy and interest.
Traditional division of cultivable land makes stratification (fragmented) and scattered land, result in low production and productivity and high cost of production.
Quality fertilizer supplied from Agriculture Input Corporation (AIC) is costly as well as untimely available. So private fertilizer dealers are involved supplying substandard fertilizer but there is no proper quality control and monitoring.
Most of the farmers are continuously used saved seed from traditional crop variety hence germination and physical purity will be low in resulting in low production & productivity.
There are no adequate and proper credit facilities in pocket area, flow & repayment of credit is also difficult due to conflict situation.
Dependency on agriculture is gradually decreasing from three decades. Tendency of new generation & literate group are involved in agriculture only after no alternate occupation, has made necessary for more effort to increase production & productivity of agriculture. Besides possibility of availability of agriculture manpower will be poor in future. So need to focus in use of appropriate technology.

1.4. A brief on APPSP

The Agriculture Perspective Plan Support Program (APPSP) is a five year program supported by DFID and MOAC of Government of Nepal. The project became effective from 24th March 2003 .

APPSP has been established to render support to the MOAC in the implementation of 20 years Agriculture Perspective Plan (APP) which is the Government of Nepal's key multi-sector policy document for agriculture and rural development. The APPSP focuses at district and national implementation of Nepal's APP and expects to contribute in reducing poverty and vulnerability, which is the main objective of PRSP/10^th Five Years Plan.

Super Goal, Goal & Purpose of the APPSP are as follows:

Super Goal:

Livelihood improvement of rural people.

Achievement of Agriculture livelihood outcomes desired by:

Ø Poor, Women, disadvantaged caste and ethnic farmers group and

Ø Poor who benefit indirectly from growth in the agriculture sector.

Goal:

Agricultural growth that benefits poor producers, agricultural workers and consumers.

Purpose:

To deliver appropriate agricultural support services to the rural poor through improved policy and institutional arrangements.

Expected Outputs

Ø Strengthened institutional capacity for pro-poor agriculture policy design and delivery

Ø Strengthened district level capacity to deliver agriculture service which maximizes potential for equitable agriculture based livelihood opportunities.

Ø Outcome focused participatory monitoring and information system linking local and national levels developed and deployed.

2. Inception of APPSP and DADF

2.1 Time line showing Year when APPSP was initiated in the district; when DADF was established; Proposal called proposals award etc. events to data in chronological order

APPSP has started formally in the district from July, 2004. Implementation of APPSP at the district level basically refers to the establishment of District Agriculture Development Fund (DADF) under DDC's District Development Fund (DDF) and to utilize this fund to expand agriculture service delivery in the district through Service Providers (S.Ps) and Farmers Group (F.Gs). The DADF intends to have quick and visible impact of the development interventions undertaken by the government and mobilize public sector resources for the benefits of disadvantaged farmers including women and those in remote areas. It is expected that activities of APPSP would orient agricultural services in the welfare of the target groups in which disadvantaged, marginal, poor women farmers, dalits, ethnic minorities etc. are in priority. The program also intends to increase the income of farming communities through enhancing the quality of the agriculture service delivery for contributing towards poverty reduction.

Table :5

Proposal called, proposals awarded and number of DEF/LIF

Fiscal Year	Date of Proposal called	Date of Proposal awarded	No.DEF projects	No. LIF projects
2061-62	2061/06/15	2061/10/08	4	13
2061-62	Not called proposal but awareness has been created informally.	2062/02	14	36
062-63		2062/06/09	15	48
062-63		2062/11/29	8	0
063-64		2063/07/19	18	137
064-65		2064/10/14	21	89
Total			80	322

First year proposal call has been done in local paper and notice in public place. Beside this awareness has been created through orientation with service providers and farmers groups and also with stake holders for accessibility of P& E groups. One NGO has also involved for LIF awareness creation. The received proposal of first year have evaluated in second year. In FY 2061/62 & 2062/63, twice proposals have been awarded.

For implementation of APPSP activities in the district, the funds of Financial Assistance (F.A.) allocated through APPSP to DADF in DDC under the following sub-heading:

a. Fund for proposals under District Extension Fund (DEF)

b. Fund for proposals under Local Initiative Fund (LIF)

c. Policy Analysis Study

d. Publication of Success stories/ Dissemination consultation

e. Service Providers work shop

2.2 Proposal Received, Qualified, Implemented & completed

As proposal receiving is an initial & important for Program Implementation. Beginning from program implementation in the district, proposals of DEF & LIF have been receiving in DSU. For regular proposal receiving from each & every VDCs especially from where proposals have not been reached at all, DSU have made effort by convincing farmers, teachers, politicians, other line-agencies, NGOs, cooperatives, local key persons, staffs by distributing leaflets, brochures & proposal formats. Even distribution of proposal formats in local fair, keeping the model of proposal formats in local town/markets for photo copy, so that rural people will get easily.

The received proposals have been opened by Technical Sub-Committee (TSC) members by doing signature on each and every proposal. As per the guide line preliminary screening was done by DSU. Qualified proposals were submitted to TSC for evaluation. TSC members were sat in round table & evaluated based on proposals screening guideline of "DADF By –laws 2061 and first amendment 2063 ".

DEF proposals obtaining 70% and above those financial proposals have been opened & analyzed by TSC. After evaluation, projects have been recommended by DADC meeting and the same have been approved by DDC meeting.

*Table:6*
Table showing proposal received, qualified, evaluated, approved, contracted out & completed.
Details	F.Y.061/62			F.Y.062/63			F.Y.063/64			F.Y.064/65			Till Date
Details	DEF	LIF	Total	DEF	LIF	Total	DEF	LIF	Total	DEF	LIF	Total	DEF	LIF	Total
Received	41	95	136	42	321	363	54	177	231	0	0	0	137	593	730
Qualified	21	61	82	31	133	164	20	148	168	35	127	162	107	469	576
Evaluated	21	61	82	31	133	164	20	148	168	25	127	152	97	469	566
Approved	18	49	67	24	100	124	18	138	156	21	89	110	81	376	457
Contracted Out	18	48	66	23	77	100	18	108	126	21	89	110	80	322	402
Completed	0	0	0	21	111	132	16	83	99	43	83	126	80	277	357

A total of 137 DEF and 593 LIF proposal have been received, among them 80 DEF and 322 LIF projects have been implemented in various VDCs of the district. The maximum no. of proposal received in FY 2062/63 but no. of DEF proposal were high in year2063/64 and LIF in year 2062/63.

More no. projects have been contracted in year 2063/64. Contracted out of DEF projects were more in year 2062/63 and more LIF in 2063/64.

A total of 357projects (DEF,LIF) have been completed till date, among those 80 of DEF and 277 of LIF projects. The maximum DEF projects have been completed in year 2064/65 and LIF were more in year 2062/63. There are 48 LIF project have not been completed due to dispute in groups, lack of knowledge for settling, un timely submission of bills and receipts and misuse of first installment.

2.3 VDCs Coverage

There are 77 VDCs & 1 municipality in Kapilvastu. All VDCs have been classified in to 3 categories based on accessibility, remoteness, facility availability like electricity, road, market, communication etc. Those are priority 1^st where less no. of facility available, priority 2^nd where moderately available and priority 3^rd where more facility available.

Looking in to project implementation of APPSP projects by different service providers (S.Ps) and farmers groups (F.Gs). A total of 74 VDCs (96%) have been covered till now. Among those 71 VDCs have been covered by DEF projects only & 55 VDCs have been covered by LIF projects only and others are mixed.

Table:7

Table showing the project implemented in different VDC categories.

Description	Unit	DEF	LIF	No. of VDCs coverage
District Head Quarter or along the roadside	No.	26	18	27
Surrounding VDCs	No.	31	25	32
Remote VDCs	No.	14	12	15
Total	No.	71	55	74 (96%)

Out of 74 VDCs. 27 VDCs from priority 1, 32VDCs from priority 2 and 15 VDCs from priority 3.

Till date only 74% VDCs of this district have been covered and Still 3 VDCs have remained to inter. More no. of VDCs yet to be covered and intensified with program in constituency area no.4 and 5 .All VDCs have been covered in constituency area no 1,.2 and 3.

Looking in to the wards coverage under different VDCs by DEF & LIF projects. A total coverage of 631 wards,145,143 and 78 wards under priority VDCs 1^st ,2^nd and 3^rd respectively by DEF projects. Like wise 55,161and 49 wards under priority VDCs 1^st ,2^nd and 3^rd respectively by LIF projects. Remote VDCs of the district and inaccessible ward & sreet tol yet to be covered.

3. Budget and expenditure

A total of NRs.48166 thousands had been approved for expenditure of DADF project implementation, policy analysis, SP workshop and dissemination & consultation including 5 % management cost. But only Rs. 41812 (86.8%) amount of released, Rs. 39888 .5(95.4%) amount have been expended for DADF project implementation. Balance is very nominal.

The maximum budget released in FY 2061/62,062/63 and 064/65 but expenditure was higher during FY 2062/63 and 2063/64 which almost 100% of released budget. The balance was more in year 2061/62. In FY 2064/65 balance has been found due to late awarding of project and few LIF projects have not claimed bill and receipts of first installment. (Table :8)

Table :8

Total budget and expenditure (in Rs. '000)

F.Y.	Allocated	Released	Expended	Balance
2061/62	8365	5113.8	3370.5	1743
2062/63	14469	11448	11435	13
2063/64	14508	14426	14424	1
2064/65	10824	10824	10659	165
Total	48166	41812	39888.5	1922.35
%		86.8	95.4	4.6

Under DEF 86.92 % of the allotted fund has been released in the district but 94.61 % of the released amount has been expended. The balance amount is little more (5.38%)due to bulky amount has not been expended in FY 2061/62.

Table :9

DEF total budget and expenditure (in Rs. '000)

DEF Projects
FY	Allocated	Released to District	Expenditure	Balance
061/62	6195	3787	2506.55	1280.45
062/63	11970	9470.66	9103.2	367.46
063/64	10750	10750	10750	0
064/65	8585.44	8585.44	8479.44	106
Total	37500.44	32593.1	30839.19	1753.91
%		86.91	94.61	5.38

Under LIF 86.48% of the allocated fund has been released in the district but 98.77% of the released amount has been expended. Here balance amount is very small. Maximum expenditure in projects was high in year 2062/63 and 2063/64. Excess amount have been expeded in year 2062/63 due to allocated budget had not been received in 3^rd trimester, since that negative balance is showing. That amount has been expended from DEF allocation. (Table 10)

Table :10

LIF total budget and expenditure (in Rs. '000)

LIF Projects
FY	Allocated	Released to District	Expenditure	Balance
061/62	2105	1286.78	799	487.78
062/63	2294	1815	2240.4	-425.4
063/64	3578.78	3578.78	3578.78	0
064/65	1621.36	1621.36	1580.97	40.39
Total	9599.14	8301.92	8199.15	102.77
%		86.48	98.77	1.22

4. District Extension Fund (DEF)

Till date a total of 80 projects have been implemented, among which 18 were in FY 2061/62, 23 were in 2062/63, 18 were in 2063/64 and 21 were in FY 2064/65. Among them only project in FY 2062/63 had not completed successfully.

4.1 Beneficiaries Composition

For any program, kind of beneficiaries is the most important to achieve the target. If beneficiaries will not be in proportionate then there will be chance of failing of the program. Involvement of the target group is more essential based on gender, socially and economically, too.

4.1.1 Beneficiaries based on Gender

A total of 578 farmers groups under DEF projects, among them 278 were of agriculture based, 140 were of live stock based and 160 were of mixed type.

Under DEF projects, no. of beneficiaries was more in this F.Y.2063/64. The female participation was more (51.79%) compared to male as target beneficiaries of program. The female participation was high in year 2061/62 (69.23%) and 2063/64 (51.2%). (Table no.11)

Table No. 11

DEF beneficiaries based on gender

Description	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Total	%
Female	No.	1618	1694	1918	1215	6445	51.79
Male	No.	719	1735	1828	1717	5999	48.21
Total	No.	2337	3429	3746	2932	12444

4.1.2 Beneficiaries based on Social Class

Out of 12444 HH under DEF31.26% are dalit, 26.25% DND, 16.77% DJ, 0.47% AJ, 7.94% RM and 17.31% BCT. More no. of dalits HHs. were participated in year 2061/62 (36.45%) followed by 2064/65(36%) and 2063/64 (27.12%). Like wise more no. of DND were participated in year 2064/65 (36.8%) followed by 2063/64 and 2062/63. RM were more in year 2063/64 (12.81%) followed by 2061/62 (8.34%) and 2064/65.(Table 12)

Table :12

DEF beneficiaries based on Social class.

Social class	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Till date	%
Dalit	HH	852	966	1016	1056	3890	31.26
Disadvantaged non-dalit	HH	248	699	1241	1079	3267	26.25
Disadvantaged janjati	HH	563	762	417	345	2087	16.77
Advantaged janjati	HH	0	17	41	0	58	0.47
Religious Minorities	HH	195	106	480	207	988	7.94
BCT	HH	479	879	551	245	2154	17.31
Total	HH	2337	3429	3746	2932	12444		100

4.1.3 Beneficiaries based on Poverty.

Among the total beneficiaries of DEF project, 10020(80.52%) were poor and remaining 19.47 %were non poor. Poor beneficiaries were more in FY. 2063/64 followed by 064/65 and 2061/62. (Table13)

Table No.13

DEF beneficiaries based on poverty.

Description	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Till date	%
Poor	No.	1403	2057	3746	2814	10020	80.520733
Non-poor	No.	934	1372	0	118	2424	19.479267
Total	No.	2337	3429	3746	2932	12444	100

5. Local Initiative Fund (LIF)

5.1 Beneficiaries Composition

5.1.1 Beneficiaries based on Gender

A total of 322 farmers groups under LIF projects, among them 184 were of agriculture based, 84 were of live stock based and 54 were of mixed type.

Under LIF projects, no. of beneficiaries was more in this F.Y.2063/64. The female participation was more (53.17%) compared to male, as female are target beneficiaries of the program. The female participation was high in year 2061/62 (69.23%) and 2063/64 (51.2%) compared to FY2062/63 and. But in FY 2063/64 male participation was more than female.(Table no.14)

Table :1 4

LIF beneficiaries based on gender

Description	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Total	%
Female	No.	589	805	878	992	3264	53.17
Male	No.	367	701	1063	744	2875	46.83
Total	No.	956	1506	1941	1736	6139

5.1.2 LIF Beneficiaries based on Social Class

Out of 6139 HH under LIF 37.27% are dalit, 22.69% DND, 12.69% DJ, 0.05% AJ, 1052% RM and 16.78% BCT. More no. of dalits HHs. were participated in year 2063/64 (41%). followed by 2064/65(37.15%), 2061/62 (36.61%) and Like wise more no. of DND were participated in year 2064/65 (38.02%) followed by 2063/64(26.17%). RM were more in year 2061/62 (16%) followed by 2064/65(12.33%).(Table 15)

Table :15

LIF beneficiaries based on Social class.

LIF social class
Social class	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Till date	%
Dalit	HH	350	490	803	645	2288	37.27
Disadvantaged non-dalit	HH	64	161	508	660	1393	22.69
Disadvantaged janjati	HH	242	221	205	111	779	12.69
Advantaged janjati	HH	0	0	3	0	3	0.05
Religious Minorities	HH	155	92	185	214	646	10.52
BCT	HH	145	542	237	106	1030	16.78
Total	HH	956	1506	1941	1736	6139	100

5.1.3 LIF Beneficiaries based on Poverty.

Among the total beneficiaries of LIF project, 5768(90.88%) were poor and remaining 9.11 %were non poor. Poor beneficiaries were more in FY. 2063/64 followed by 064/65 and 2061/62. (Table16)

Table No.16

DEF beneficiaries based on poverty.

Description	Unit	F.Y.061/62	F.Y.062/63	F.Y.063/64	F.Y.064/65	Till date	%
Poor	No.	1047	1106	1921	1690	5764	90.88
Non-poor	No.	109	403	20	46	578	9.11
Total	No.	1156	1509	1941	1736	6342	100

6. Group type

The farmers groups were involved for getting benefits were of agriculture based than Live stock based and livestock and mixed type were same in number.(Table 17)

Table No. 17

Group Types:

Group type	Unit	DEF	LIF	Total
Agri. based	No	278	184	462
Livestock	No	140	84	224
Mixed	No	160	54	214
Total group	No	578	322	900

7 . Types of Project activities

As per the goal of the APPSP livelihood improvement of rural farmers through agriculture growth. Different projects of DEF & LIF have been proposed for different kinds of components like skill development, capacity building, Income generating activities, market promotion, irrigation support, chilling vat details of activities have been illustrated in Table 18.

Among the total projects, more no. of project is of vegetable production with small irrigation were 169; goat rearing projects were 84; Vegetable production only were 34, fish farming were 23, tube well and pumpset were 19 irrigation were 13, TPS potato are 3; Each of Bee-keeping, Pig rearing3, veg., goat & bee-keeping, Banana farming, Banana, goat & poultry, veg., goat& irrigation, veg., goat& fish and veg., goat & pig projects were 2 and Each of Cattle shed floor construction, veg., Market shed construction & dairy chilling vat are 1 in number.

Mixed types of project were in DEF than LIF. Project of treadle pump were more due to more affordable and manageable by small farmers and also Nepal SIMI had given more emphasis in demand of treadle pump by facilitating in proposal writing.

Table No. 18

Table showing type of projects implemented in F.Y. 061/62, 062/63 and 063/64.

S.N	Type	Unit	DEF	LIF	Total
1	Cattle shed floor construction	No.	1	0	1
2	Veg.& Irrigation (Treadle pump, motor, pumpset)	No.	9	160	169
3	Veg. Production	No.	1	33	34
4	Veg., Market shed construction	No.	2	0	2
5	Goat Rearing	No.	13	71	84
6	Goat & Pig Rearing	No.	0	1	1
7	Buffalo Rearing	No.	1	0	1
8	Pig Rearing	No.	1	2	3
9	Fish farming	No.	1	22	23
10	Fish farming & Piggeries	No.	1	0	1
11	Bee Keeping	No.	1	3	4
12	Irrigation	No.	0	13	13
13	Chilling vat	No.	1	0	1
14	Veg., Goat, Bee keeping	No.	2	0	2
15	TPS Potato	No.	2	2	4
16	Banana farming	No.	0	5	5
17	Banana, Goat, Poultry	No.	2	0	2
18	Veg., goat, Irrigation	No.	3	0	3
19	Veg., goat	No.	2	2	4
20	Veg., Piggeries, Irrigation	No.	1	0	1
21	Veg., goat, Irrigation, Fish	No.	2	0	2
22	Veg., Goat & Pig Rearing	No.	6	0	6
23	Veg., Goat, Poultry & Pig Rearing	No.	1	0	1
24	Poultry Farm	No.	0	5	5
25	Veg. Seed Production	No.	0	1	1
26	Turmeric	No.	0	1	1
27	Check Dam Construction	No.	1	0	1
28	Veg. production & Pig	No.	1	0	1
29	Irrigation & Goat	No.	1	0	1
30	Goat & Livestock and Bee-Keeping	No.	1	0	1
31	Veg. TPS, Goat Rearing	No.	1	0	1
32	Market Construction	No.	1	0	1
33.	Tube well and Pumpset	No.	19	0	19
34	Treadle pump and Goat	No.	1	0	1
35	Treadle pump and Pigeon	No.	1	0	1
	Total	No.	80	322	402

8. Types of Service Providers

DEF project have been implemented by different kinds of service providers. A total of 59 DEF projects, 36 are NGOs, 11 are cooperative, 8 are CBOs, Agri. Farmers group & Agriculture Graduate are 3 and only one is agriculture service centre.

Table 14

Table showing type of Service Providers in F.Y. 061/62, 062/63 and 063/64.

S.N	Type	2061/62	2062/63	2063/64	2064/65	Total
1	CBOs	3	2	1	3	9
2	NGOs	11	15	12	14	52
3	Cooperative	2	4	5	4	15
4	Agriculture Farmers Group		2			2
5	Agri. graduate	1	0			1
6	Agriculture Service	1	0			1
	Total	18	23	18	21	80

9. Duration of the project

All the LIF projects duration is similar i.e. for 6 months. And DEF projects duration is illustrated in table no. 15.

Table no.15

Table showing the duration of the implemented DEF projects.

S. N.	Duration in month	No. of DEF projects
1	6	38
2	9	2
3	12	39
4	18	1

There are, 39 DEF projects of one year, 38 projects of 6 month duration, 2 of 9 months and only one is of one and half year period. (Annexure 1)

10. DADF activities:

In DEF projects, service providers (S.Ps) were mobilized farmers groups by participating in monthly meeting, facilitating for their decision, assisting in collection of service & its mobilization in credit and supporting in group strengthening. Like wise in LIF projects, farmers groups also conduct social mobilization activities themselves or sometime assisted by local NGOs volunteers.

a) Project Orientation

To make aware to all stakeholders, beneficiaries, project orientation has been conducted by all Service Providers before commencing the projects. In this event, project brief (project name, area, beneficiaries and activities) financial description item wise, calendar of operation, roles & responsibilities of BMC, contribution of beneficiaries have been disscussed. The effect of this event was very importance in iffective implementatioin of the project and very good tool for transparency.

b) Project Hoarding Board

For the purpose of transparency holding board has been displayed in public place of target area. On which, project description, financial summary, supporting organization name in visible way. This was helped in publicity of theproject and for better understandinf of the with civil society.

c) BMC Meeting

Soon after agreement, awarded Service Providers & DADO, 3 beneficiaries Monitoring Committee members had been called in DSU & discussed in details on project, budget details , rate, contributions, BMC's roles & responsibilities and calendar of operation. One copy of contract paper & financial proposal details have been given to them. This was very much helpful in better utilization of resourses.

d) Skill development activities

In DEF, for skill development, there are different kinds of trainings like Nursery raising, crop management, compost/FYM management, post harvest technology, market management, IPM farmer's field school in rice etc. to support in production of vegetable, banana rice & potato components, like wise shed management, field management, health management, new born animal care, pregnant animal care & management training have been proposed & conducting by different S.Ps and F.Gs in case of goat & pig rearing activities. In case of bee keeping, different types of 2-3 training, poultry management training.

DEF projects have also been organized line agency & stockholder coordination meeting/ workshop for promotion of market as well institutional development of the groups.

e) Income generating activities

Only training, meeting, workshop, visit are not enough to improve the livelihood of poor & excluded, there are various types of IGA components based on need of target groups have been executed by different S.P & F.G since vegetable production is very much suitable cultivation, consumption & market for small land holding farmers, more no. of projects are of vegetable production type, goat rearing and pig rearing is very much suitable for landless as well as very less/ problematic land holding farmers. Goat rearing activities are also more under DEF & LIF. Especially, women are much like goat keeping component than vegetable production. Handling & benefit sharing of goat is under control of women is more.

There are other various types of IGA like banana cultivating, bee-keeping, pig rearing, buffalo rearing, fish farming.

11. Supporting Activities

Irrigation Support

For cultivating agriculture group irrigation is much more important to increase production as well productivity. Only 29% of area of the district is under irrigation. In this district, treadle pump is predominantly practiced by small holding farmers for small irrigation. Like wise, to some extant electric motors, pump set, are also purchased under DEF & LIF projects for lifting water from river, ponds and lakes. Few sallow tube wells boring have been installed for irrigation purpose.

Agri.-inputs & implements support

For poor and traditional farmers, improved variety of seeds, material of seasonal & off seasonal vegetable, potato (TPS), banana fodder, bee box & bee colony with foundation colony, Honey exactor, bee Vail have been supported. Like wise to increase judicious use of appropriate chemical fertilizer & pesticides with necessary implements like sprayer tank, rose gain, nursery material plastics. For livestock side, goat kids, piglets, buffalo have been supported through DEF & LIF projects.

Market Support

It's said that market pulls the production & research pushes the production. In the districting them are weekly markets are available in some extant for selling & purchasing the problems & daily need materials under DEF at 3 places (Chandrauta, Jaynagar & Odari) the program has supported for construction of market shed and weights, balance and carets.

Breed improvements

Traditional breed of livestock have very low productivity & low income per unit cost of production. Therefore need of high yield in improved breed for natural production is highly important. This program has distributed important. This program has distributed improved breed of buffalo bull buck (He goat), male pig lets.

Cattle shed improvement

Cattle urine has more nutrients than cattle dung. Traditional types of cattle sheds are un-hygienic and losses of nutrients are more. So that, it needs improve cattle floor for collection of urine and cow dung. It also helps to reduce external and internal parasites of cattle. Ultimately it helps to improve health of cattle and yield of milk. Under DEF cattle shed floor has been made cemented and constructed urine tank for collection of urine. Collected urine used for agricultural crops.

g. Chilling-vat installation

Under DEF Project, a better price of milk produced by rural farmers, accessible place for milk producing farmers and transportation a chilling-vat in under installation by a cooperative service provider.

Milking also has supported for easy & hygienic collection of milk.

Others Livestock supporting activities

APPSP projects have been supported many activities like, tagging for easy identification, drenching against internal parasites, dipping against external parasites, vaccination against different bacterial, viral diseases for goat, pig, poultry and cattle. Fodder production also has been supported by the program through DEF/LIF projects.

12. Social mobilization & technical backstopping

In all most all DEF project, social mobilizer technical staff of agriculture or livestock have been recruited in daily ways or monthly bases for supporting target group farmers. SPs use to mobilize the social mobilizer (SM) in field in group meeting for saving & credit mobilization, facilitating the meeting arranging the training and also convey the message from SP to F.G and F.G. to SP.

Technical staff (JTA, I.Sc.Ag, B.Sc. Ag) of agriculture or livestock depending on nature of project use to visit farmers home, field, suggest for betterment of crop/livestock production. Try to solve the problem encountered with crop or livestock. Staff also supporting in training, visit, input distribution, demonstration & use of treadle pump, sprayer etc. Agriculture technicians advise & recommend the farmers in the case of insect pest occurrence in the crop and any problem to livestock.

13. Public Audit

From this F.Y. public audit have been carried out in each and every DEF projects for the purpose of making good governance/transparency, increasing community ownership and awareness to civil society and other people. Till now 1o DEF project's service providers have been completed accordingly (Table No. 16) . In this event BMC members, beneficiaries, Local Political parties member, ASC/LSSC representative, Civil societies, DSU member and local& district line agencies.

Table:16

Table showing Service providers carried out Public Audit

S.N.	Service providers Name	Address	Remarks
1	Ravi Samudaik Swasthya Kendra	Dhankauli
2	Adarsh Manav Utthan Sanstha	Haranampur
3	Gramin Garivi Niwaran Kendra	Dumara
4	Krishi Bahuuddhyasiya Co. Ltd. Sanstha	Motipur
5	Lumibini Community Org.	Pakadi
6	Srawangin Bikash Ka Lagi Parwartan Nepal	Banganga
7	Banganga Dugdha Co. Org. Ltd.	Motipur
8	Indreni Rural Development Centre	Jaynagar
9	Patariya Community Learning Centre	Patariya
10	Jansewa Social Centre	Parshoiya
11	Laxmanghat Swabhalamban Co. Org. Ltd.	Bishunpur
12	Rajendramani Pathak	Somdih
13	Dalit Samajik Bikash Kendra	Niglihawa
14	Namuna Farmars Grup	Hathausa- 8
15	Sarad Samaj Kapilvastu	Shivapur -6
16	Dalit Utthan Samaj Nepal	Niglihawa -3
17	Small Farmars Coaperative Org.	Bhalawad 2
18	Indrini Gramin Dev. Centre	Jayanagar
19	Janakalan Sanstha	Patariya- 6
20	Annapurna Samajik Service Centre	Kapilvastu -9
21	Samajia Jagaran & Dev.Sanstha	Banganga -7
22	Janachetana Community Organization	Dohani -4
23	Shidhartha Saving & Credit Cooperative Ltd.	Gajehada-7
24	Gramin Garivi Niwaran Kendra	Dumara-7
25	Kapilvastu Intergraded Development Services-KIDS Project	KV municipality 2
26	Amardeep Social Development Centre	Mahendrakot-7
27	Bishwadristi Org. Vision	Baluhawa-2
28	Rahul Social Development Centre	Pipara 1-9
29	Shiwam Multi Purpose Social Centre	Lalpur-5
30	Yams Social Development Centre	Bijuwa 1
31	Lumbini Social Service Centre	jaynagar,
32	Kapilvastu Saving & Credit Cooperative Org.	Kapilvastu minicipality
33	Jankalyan Multi Purpose Cooperative Organization Ltd.	Sihokhor-6
34	Kalika Self-Reliance Service Centre-KSSC Nepal	KV Nagarpalika
35	Mahalaxmi Self-Reliance Saving & Credit Cooperative Ltd.	Ganeshpur 1
36	Sisawa Community Health Centre	Sisawa-2
37	Siddhartha Market Management Committee	Gajehada – 7
38	Buddha Gramin Bikash Tatha Sarasafai Sanstha	Labani
39	Samaj Kalyan M.P.Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.	Sauraha
40	Fulika Community Learning Centre	Fulika
41	Jankalyan Sanstha	Patariya
42	Samajik Sarokar Kendra	Hariharpur
43	Ganesh Krishi Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.	Kapilvastu Municipality
44	Adarsh Manav Utthan Kendra	Haranampur
45	Dalit Samajik Bikash Kendra	Gotihawa
46	Bindabashini Manav Utthan Swastha Prajanan Kendra	Baluhawa
47	Dalit Janjagaran Sewa Sangha	Jaynagar
48	Samaj Kalyan M.P.Sewa Kendra	Titirkhi
49	Srwangin Bikash Kendra	Sihkhor
50	Lumbini Samudaik Sangha	Pakadi
51	Laligurash Krishi Sahakari Sangha	Dubiya
52	Samudak Pariwar Bikash Kendra	Kapilvastu Municipality
53	Kapilvastu Intrigrated Development Services-KIDS Project	Kapilvastu Municipality
54	Janaki Krisak Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.	Maharajgunj
55	Annapurna Samajik Sewa Kendra	Jawabhari
56	Jankalyan Samajik Sanstha	Dohani
57	Lumbini Akikrit Bikash Sanstha	Manpur
58	Yuwa Samaj Nepal	Lalpur
59	Lumbini Akikrit Bikash Sanstha	Manpur

14. Program supporting activity by DSU

In year 2061-62, familiarization with the district and line agencies .
orientation on APPSP to DADO staff and livestock staff.
Orientation on APPSP to district line agencies.
Orientation to district service Providers
Orientation to group farmers
Preparation of DADF bylaws and approval through DDC.
Preparation of DADF guide lines and approval through DDC.
Proposal call in local news paper and awareness.
Proposal submission , processing and award to approved proposal.
LIF awareness though NGO.
In F.Y 2062/63, a new DPA has been arrived in this district and became familiar with all the program of F.Y.2061/62 and with all the officials by visiting & meeting.
Going through all the documents DSU feel to add and improve some kind's o formats for easy submission of proposals, contract out, installment release, report submission etc. DSU has also prepared and approved financial norms (rate list) of different inputs and service cost for formality of the projects.
DSU has facilitated and advised to submission of proposal to NGOs, Cooperatives, FGs, CBOs, committees etc. Also, made focus on VDCs where proposals have not been received or projects have been not implemented till now by convincing & distributing leaflets, pamphlets & proposal's formats.
DSU has facilitated UK/DFID visit team in Kapilvastu for interaction with DADO, DLSO, DDC staffs and also for interaction with farmers of Dhankauli (DEF project of Sunshine Social Development Center) & Niglihawa (LIF project of Laxmi Vegetable production Group).
DSU has oriented about APPSP & its system to new SADO, LDO CDO and DPC for easy & smooth running of program in the district.
DSU has participated many meetings, workshops, visits in the district, conducted by line agencies, service providers, farmers groups and other program also participated staff meeting of DADO & DLSO, Women Co-operatives meeting of WDO.
DSU has taken part on RMO training in Nepalgunj conducted by Risk Management Office, officer's level training & Visit conducted by Nepal SIMI.

· During F.Y.2062/63, 5 times TSC meetings have been organized for proposals opening, evaluation & recommendation. During proposal evaluation all the members of TSC have been actively participated for proposal marking & evaluation as well as discussion was made for proposal evaluation criteria. They have suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria. They have to suggested to revisit to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria.

DSU has organized & participated 3 times of LFP/APPSP coordination meeting for making linkage between two DFID projects in the district. Both programs have made common consideration & commitment for going together in the community with different components.
DSU has participated in monitoring of the different types of DEF and LIF implemented projects with Technical Monitoring Committee.
DSU has facilitated to Monitoring & Evaluation Specialist visit and APPSP/CSU visit team (Program Manager & Program Advisor & decentralized service delivery Specialist) in the district.

DSU has facilitated to SAGA team by assisting in interaction with S.P & farmers groups in the program implemented area, also, helped for collecting data from different line agencies, stakeholders.
DSU has conducted orientation and signature verification to BMC members for respective proposals submitted with the help of RLSO & SADO. Roles and responsibility of BMC has also been made aware and citizenship of BMC has been collected during orientation.
DSU has made practices to all progress for displaying budget details board, orientation regarding project before project execution & public audit at the end of project for the purpose of transparency.
DSU has also assisted visit team of Western Regional Agriculture Directorate, Phokhara 12 districts SADOs visit, Department of Agriculture (DOA) & MOAC and also visit from other district.

Going through all the documents DSU feel to add and improve some kinds of formats for easy submission of proposals, contract out, installment release, report submission etc. DSU has also revisited and approved financial norms (rate list) of different inputs and service cost for formality of the projects.
DSU has facilitated and advised to submission of proposal to NGOs, Cooperatives, FGs, CBOs, committees etc. Also, made focus on VDCs where proposals have not been received or projects have been not implemented till now by convincing & distributing leaflets, pamphlets & proposal's formats.
DSU has facilitated MTR visit team in Kapilvastu for interaction with DADO, LSO, DDC staffs and also for interaction with farmers of Banganga, Motipur, Gajehada, Hathousa (DEF project of Siddrtha saving & Credit Mobilization Co. Ltd., Srwangin Bikash ka lagi Pariwartan Nepal, Banganga Dairy Cooperative Org. Ltd, Namuna Krisak Samuh, Samajik Jagaran Bikash Sanstha etc.) & Niglihawa, Kapilvastu-9 (LIF project of Jagaran ,Jyoti & Laligurash Women Farmer Group , Laxmi Vegetable production Group, Himali Women Fish Farming Group etc.).
DSU has oriented about APPSP & its system to new SADO, LDO and CDO for easy & smooth running of program in the district.
DSU has participated many meetings, workshops, visits in the district, conducted by groups and other program also participated staff meeting of DADO & DLSO, Women Co-operatives meeting of WDO.
DSU has taken part on cluster meeting in Bhairahawa conducted by RSU Office.
DSU has participated in Officer's level training & Visit conducted by Nepal SIMI.

· During F.Y.2063/64, 7 times TSC meetings have been organized for proposals opening, evaluation & recommendation. During proposal evaluation all the members of TSC have been actively participated for proposal marking & evaluation as well as discussion was made for proposal evaluation criteria. They have suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria. They have suggested revisiting to disaggregate mark of proposal scoring criteria.

· During this F.Y 2063/64, 3 times DADC meetings have been organized for screened project proposal recommendation, and addition of project duration of not completed DEF projects in their time.

During this F.Y 2063/64, 3 times DDC board meetings have project recommended by DADC. First time, 19 DEF & 160 LIF projects have been approved but one DEF and 53 LIF project has not been contract out due to lack of FA fund.
DSU has prepared and approved the first revised DADF By-laws 2063 and DADF working guideline 2064 from DDC meeting, containing APPSP district, Criteria of proposal screening, evaluation & approval, proposal formats of DEF & LIF, M & E tools, Roles & responsibilities of BMC, TMC, DMC, TSC, DADC & DDC, important documents for project agreement, project implementation guideline (like : holding board, Training, Distribution of seed, Treadle Pump, goat, hegoat etc.), office documentation, , Important document for advance releasing, Insurance policy of Livestock, Public audit etc.
DSU has organized & participated 3 times of LFP/APPSP coordination meeting for making linkage between two DFID projects in the district. Both programs have made common consideration & commitment for going together in the community with different components.
DSU has organized the social mobilization training (Trainer were RLSO, SADO, DPC, DPA & Planning Officer) & publication of social mobilization booklet whish was opening by LDO.
DSU has participated in monitoring of the different types of DEF and LIF implemented projects with Technical Monitoring Committee.
DSU has facilitated to RD, DOA, MOAC, DG and APPSP/CSU visit team (Program Manager & Program Advisor & decentralized service delivery Specialist) in the district.

DSU has conducted orientation and signature verification to BMC members for respective proposals. Roles and responsibility of BMC has also been made aware and citizenship of BMC has been collected during orientation.
DSU has made practices to all progress for displaying budget details board, orientation regarding project before project execution & public audit at the end of project for the purpose of transparency.
In year 2064-65, Support in video documentaries preparation by CSU.
Facilitation in Value Chain Approach Training conducted by Nepal SIMI/APPSP.
Participation in cluster meeting in Butwal.
Participation in LLW TOT in Salyan
Conduction of LLW in different location and level.
Participation and facilitatiuon of SED training to SPs and DADC members.

15. Service provider's coordination meeting/ workshop

In F.Y.2062/63, 3 times, in F.Y.2063/64, 4 times and in F.Y.2064/65, 3 times, Service provider's coordination meetings have been done from DSU support and 1 time workshop has been conducted from DADO (according to FA subheading part) for collecting progress report, review of progress, to make aware about different formats, effective to program monitor & sharing of knowledge and experiences among SPs and line agencies and also giving feedback for weaknesses, to know about problems and solutions.

The workshop was conducted systematically in four sessions. In morning two sessions, objective of workshop, status of APPSP in district, progress achieved by implementing has SPs during the period. Total participants were 126 (CDO, LDO, Parties, Line agencies, Pm, RLSOs, DADC members, Donor agencies)

Afternoon session was mainly focused on group discussion on three different topics.

During the workshop Program Manager, LDO, CDO, RLSOs, SADO, journalists and eight parties political representatives have been given emphasis on effective and output oriented program implementation honestly, transparently, accountability for poor and excluded communities.

Table:17

Table showing activities which have been done by DSU

16.Activities performed through out Fiscal Year 2061-62 to 064-65

FY 2061/62

S. N.	Date	Activities	Details/Major decision	Remarks
1	9-10 Sep.2004	Organization of district stake holder familiarization visit & D.H.Q based DADO staff introductory meeting	district stake holder familiarization visit to DDC, CDO, DLSO, DFO, Cop distributed brochure .
2	14 Sep 04	Collection of name list SP	Collected name list of NGO, Coop in the district.
3	3 Oct 2004	APPSP orientation workshop to ex local authorities, social worker, journalist, political parties	One day APPSP orientation workshop to explain procedure of APPSP to local authorities, social worker, journalist, political parties
4	5,6 Oct 2004	APPSP orientation workshop to FG, SP	One day APPSP orientation workshop to explain procedure of APPSP to SP, FG.
5	18,22 Sep 2004	DADC orientation	One day APPSP orientation workshop to explain procedure of APPSP to DADC members
6	4 Oct 2004	DLSO staffs orientation	One day APPSP orientation workshop to explain procedure of APPSP to DLSO staff
7	2061/6/15	Proposal Called	LIF DEF proposal called in local paper and public place.
8	2061/10/8	DEF LIF Awarded	LIF DEF project approved by DADC
9	2062/2/9	DEF LIF Awarded	LIF DEF project approved by DADC
10	2062/3/12,13	SP workshop	Review of progress of DEF project
FY 2062/63
11	062/5/6	TSC Member /RLSO	Opening of received proposals
12	062/5/28	TSC Member	Discussion on prelimenary screening Returning of disqualified proposal Priority to season suitable project Financial norms
13	062/5/29	TSC Member	Proposal evaluation
14	062/5/30	TSC Member	Proposal evaluation
15	062/6/2	TSC Member	Proposal evaluation
16	062/6/3	TSC Member	Proposal evaluation
	062/6/5	TSC Member	Opening of financial proposal os 70% above scored S.Ps.
12	062/6/16	TSC Member	Retuning of failed proposals (less than min. score) 15 DEF & 100 LIF proposal recommendation
13	062/6/19	DADC Member	15 DEF & 100 LIF recommended for project implemented monitors, reporting, expaces according to financial norms.
14	062/10/3	TSC Member	BMC members of DEFproposal to be called for singnature verification & information about program.
15	062/10/27	TSC Member	Proposal evaluation & 9 are proposal to recommendation.
16	062/11/17	TSC Member	9 DEF proposal's project profile asked Punishment to whom, has not worked properly by back listing in local paper.
17	062/11/18	DADC Member	Member of TSC Ms. Shanti Devi Chamar has selected
18	063/3/1	DADC Member	Notice for timely advance settlement to DEF & LIF implemented project of 061/62 & 062/63. Repairing of not working Treadle pump Authority for project recommendation Conduction of poly analysis workshop by the end of this F.Y.(25th Asadh 2063) Coverage of VDC where project has not been implemented till now by awareness program through DADO (Hording board, Lond span, Pumphalet)
19	063/3/21	TSC Member	S.P coordination meeting for creative suggestion Opening of DEF & LIF proposals
20	063/3/31	TSC Member	Opening of DEF/LIF proposal in this F.Y.02062/63

FY 2063/64

S. N.	Date	Activities	Details/Major decision		Remarks

1.	2063.06.07	TSC meeting (nine members present)	v LIF proposal opening/given to DSU for preliminary screening. v Recommended male (Mr.Chaturbhuji mani Tripathy) and female (Minu Shreshtha) farmers representative for Technical Sub Committee. v Forwarded to DADC the last year approved LIF projects for agreement after field verification so as to not duplicate. v Give priority and emphasis on permanent items like chilling vat, market shed, shallow boring, resource centre establishment, seed production, biogas etc. v DSU presented the 20qualified out of 25 DEF proposals and decided to return disqualified proposals to the concerned SP. v No submission/ registration of proposals till ongoing DADF projects will complete. v During new project recommendation, it should not repeat the ward from existing DEF/LIF projects. v Next meeting on 2063.06.08 in DDC hall.
2.	2063.06.08	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Twenty DEF proposals were evaluated and scores were listed (18 were crossed more than 70%). (The highest 79.5%ofSiswasosial centre &lowest 65.5%of Adarsh co-Operative Ltd.) Decided to open the financial proposals of across 70% DEF proposals in next meeting.
3.	2063.06.09	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Opened the financial proposals of more than 70% DEF. · Given to DSU for preparation of financial details.
4.	2063.06.28	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Discussion made on details prepared by DSU.
5.	2063.06.29	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Evaluated LIF proposals.
6.	2063.06.30	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Evaluated LIF proposals.
7.	2063.06.29	TSC meeting (nine members present)	· Eighteen DEF and 137 LIF projects were recommended to DADC.
8.	2063.07.01	DADC meeting (Eighteen members present)	· Increased the duration up to Mansir 2063 of incomplete LIF & DEF projects of last year due to many reasons. · Remaining installments will be given to last year DEF and LIF projects according to monitoring report. · Decided to agreement last year 1 DEF &23 LIF projects from this year amount. · Decided to convert the fishery activities of Mukti Social Devt.Centre, Dharampania due to duplication with LFP in to Boring and pumpset in Fulika-6. · Recommended eighteen DEF and 137 LIF projects to DDC but condition was not to repeat the beneficiaries of new or old projects. · Priorities should be given percentage of obtained score and season wise crop. · Discussion made on the draft first revised DADF By-laws 2063 to DDC for endorsement.
9.	2063.10. 14	DADC meeting (Eighteen members present)	· Recommended the first revised DADF By-laws 2063 to DDC for endorsement.
10.	2064.02. 16	DADC meeting (Twenty members present)	· Recommended the DADF working guide line 2064 according to first revised DADF bylaws 2063 to DDC for endorsement. · Increased the duration up to Asadh15th, 2064 of agreement time lapsed of LIF & DEF projects of last and this F.Y. if there is a genuine reason. · Decision made that service providers who don't complete in time and improper implementation of project will be firstly warned , secondly name published in local paper and thirdly in national paper. Also, sp. who worked properly and effectively will be awarded and published in national paper. · Others related to DADO.
11.	2063.07.01	DDC board meeting	· Approved 18+1 DEF and 137+23LIF projects
12	2063.10.28	DDC board meeting	· Endorsed the first revised DADF Bylaws 2063.
13.	2064.03.25	DDC board meeting	· Endorsed the DADF working guideline 2064.
			·
S.N.	Date	Activities		Details/Major decision
1.	2063.05.18	SP Coordination meeting 18 members participant		v 14 SPs presented their progress report, output, issues & recommendations. v Decided to participate chairperson/ secretary/ treasurer necessarily & present their progress report in news print & submit their report to concern unit. v Decided to conduct next meeting in DADO meeting hall on 22^nd Kartik 2063 and organized by Gautam Buddha Yuva Kalb & awarded to Sarad Samaj Nepal for exllent presentation in last meeting. v Decided to organized one day audit account training for financial capacity increase in leadership of Gautam Buddha Yuva Club in DADO meeting hall and date will be finalized later on.
2.	2063.07.22	SP Coordination meeting 18 members participant		· 15 SPs presented their progress report, output, issues & recommendations. · Decided to participate chairperson/ secretary necessarily & present their progress report in news print & submit their report to concern unit and next meeting will hold in 20^th Poush 2063. · Committed regular collection of authentic data after implementing their activity and recommend the appropriate suggestion. · Account management training will be held on frist Saturday of Mangsir 2063. · Awarded to Sidartha Saving & Credit Cooperative Ltd. Gajehada.
3.	2063.07.23	SP Coordination meeting 23 members participant		· New 18 SPs were oriented regarding process of agreement & DEF project implementation. · Required format distribute as soon as possible.
4.	2063.09.20	SP Coordination meeting 34 members participant		· 30 SPs presented their progress report, output, issues & recommendations. · Awarded to Indreni Rular Development Centre, Jaynagar. · Decided to next meeting on 10^thFalgun 2063. · Continuous two times absent in SPs coordination meeting will be noticed in DDC and DAO with later. · Formation of coordination committee of APPSP's SPs. · Decided to conduct on get together party on 29^th Poush 2063 in Butwal Lake site coordinated by Madhav Parajuli and assisted by Krish Poudel, Sharma & Dubedi. · Decided to one day social mobilization training for capacity build up SPs social mobilizer on 6^th Magh 2063.
5.	2064.02.21	SPs Workshop meeting 126 participant (CDO, LDO, Parties, Line agencies, Pm, RLSOs, DADC members, Donor agencies		· Decided to necessarily participate agreement holders of SPs in next workshop, meeting office contact otherwise no submission of document and financial work will be done. · Decided to last date of documents, bill & receipt for settlement up to 15^th Asadh 2064 otherwise dismiss of their agreement.
FY2064/65
1	2064/5/20	TSC meeting		· Discussion on DEF LIF proposal Submitted to DSU
2	2064/6/15	TSC meeting		· Proposal Opening
3	2064/6/16	TSC meeting		· Proposal Opening
4	2064/6/17	TSC meeting		· Proposal Opening
5	2064/6/24	TSC Meeting		· Criteria Developed & preliminary screening
6	2064/6/25	TSC Meeting		· Evaluation
7	2064/6/26	TSC Meeting		· Evaluation
8	2064/6/28	TSC Meeting		· Evaluation
9	2064/6/29	TSC Meeting		· Evaluation
10	2064/7/22	DADC meeting		· Discussion on based on new bylaws and guideline
11	2064/7/21	GIS orientation		· DADC members from MOAC
12	2064/8/18	DADC meeting		· Discussion on deadlock of DADF project
13	2064/8/19	DADC meeting		· Discussion on deadlock of DADF project
14	2064/10/11	DADC meeting		· Clearance on deadlock of DADF project
15	2065/3/11	DADC meeting		· DADF closing letter aware to DADC.
16	2064/4/29	Opening of APPSP a Glance 2064, Modern Ag. Tech. & Video Doc.		· Show, distribution at the presence of PM, CDO, LDO, RLSO & other 50 DADC participants
17	2064/5/20	SP workshop		· Review of progress by SP's under DEF
18	2064/5/24	Interaction on effect on youth due to conflict situation		· Manoj Sharma & Arpita Nepal from DFID facilitated
19	2064/4/9-13	VCA training		· Conducted by Nepal Simi & APPSP to DADC member & Sps
20	2064/11/2	SP orientation		· New awarded SPs oriented on Rules and regulations of DADF
21	2064/11/20,21,24,30	BMC meeting		· Seven SPs BMC Oriented
22	2064/11/22	Carrey over SPs Orientation		· Old SPs were oriented to complete timely
23	2064/11/24,26,30,	BMC meeting		· 13 SP's BMC oriented in detail
24	2064/12/12,17,18,	BMC meeting		· 4 SP's BMC oriented in detail
25	2065/1/22,2/14,20,21,23,26,27,28,	BMC meeting		· 15 SP's & GF BMC oriented in detail
26	2065/2/30	SP WORKSHOP		· Review of SP Progress under DEF
27	2065/3/5,8	BMC meeting		· 4 GF BMC oriented in detail
28	2065/4/21	DMC meeting		· Review of DADF till Date
29	2065/5/9,10	SED training		· DADC, political parties, & SPs facilitated by Mrs. S Khadka & Mr. R Bista.
30	2065/4/22,23,27	LLW of DEF beneficiaries		· LLW at Pakadi, Maharajgung & Kopawa.
31	2065/4/24,28,29,	LLW of LIF beneficiaries		· LLW at Gotihawa, BuddhiBahadurgung.
32	2065/4/30,31	LLW of SP beneficiaries		· LLW at Jayanagar & Taulihawa
33	2065/5/10	LLW of DADC beneficiaries		· LLW of DADC at Taulihawa facilited by RLSO, & supervised by PB Shakya

17. Project Monitoring

Monitoring is the most essential for any program to make effective as well as qualitative. Though sufficient no. of monitoring has not been done for all the project. But name of projects installment has been released with out monitoring.

Projects have been monitored by Technical Monitoring Committee (TMC) comprising of Senior Agriculture Development Officer (SADO), District Livestock Development Officer (DLSO), District program Coordinator (DPC), District Program Advisor (DPA) and also with subject matter specialist (SMS), Journalist (Annapurna Post, Lumbini), Local Development Officer (LDO), Administrative Officer of CDO, NGO Fed. Representative, sometimes JT/JTA, monitoring have been usually done after submission of bills & receipts by S.Ps & F.Gs

During program monitoring, beneficiaries, member of beneficiaries and other person of the community. TMC used to meet with and ask about the project implementation, Group mobilization, saving & credit situation, Trainings, quality input support, irrigation support, staff mobilization, support from technical staff, project activities etc. Even quantity of input, depth of Treadle Pump, boring, weight of goat, pig, seeds, fertilizer, pesticides, sprayer tank, bee hives, colors, fish production, market stator etc. will be asked during field monitoring.

If there will be any different from project agreement to service delivery then TMC try to suggest S.P.& F.G to current the project implementation method & also try to inform to beneficiaries about type quantity & quality of material & service to be provided by S.P.& F.G.

TMC has also assist in back stopping about technical problem faced by farmers. (Suggestions about insect pesticides, diseased, weeds, irrigation, need, earthly up for crop, shed management, feeding system driveling, dipping, discerns etc. for live stock)

Some times depute/conflict between S.P & beneficiaries among group member will be settled by TMC in the present to local representative will society & others. (Table No. 20)

*Table : 21*
Table showing the No. of project monitored up to F.Y.2063/64.
Type	DEF	LIF	Total
District Head Quarter or along the roadside	28	62	90
Surrounding VDCs	52	110	162
Remote VDCs	61	149	210
Total	141	321	462

18. Observations found & measures taken from field monitoring

A. Inferior & less quality of Agriculture input distribution:

This case was observed by technical monitoring team (SADO, DPA) visited on 14^thfeb.2006 in Jan Chetana Samudayik Sanstha, Dohani. The S.P. has distributed less-viable vegetable seed of bitter gourd, cucumber & pumpkin. That quantity was also less. That should be equal to amount of Rs.200 each member. At the time of monitoring these type of information has been colleted & verified with submitted bills & receipts. The S.P has been asked & deducted the exceed amount.. Again, It has been made to distribute rail Quantity & Quantity of seed to targeted groups.

Like wise, Jan chetan Samudaik Sanstha, Dohani, Gramin Garivi Niwaran, Dumara, Rahul Social Service Centre, Pipara have distributed inferior & less quality of goats also in un appropriate time, was observed by TMC. Those were corrected and Jan Chetan Samudaik Sanstha has been punished by warning letter & published in local newspaper.

TMC was observed distribution of low quality and less population of bee colony, hive, & medicine in CFID, Banganga which have been made correction. Like wise CLC, Patariya, Mukti Samajik Bikash Sanstha,IRDC, Jaynagar, Jansewa Samajik Kendra, Parsoiya, SICO, Kopawa, Ravi Samudaik Swasthay Kendra, Dhankauli, Shivam SAmajik Kendra, Lalpur have been made correction of their defaults.

Many cases in office management like displaying of office board, regular meeting of executive bodies with necessary decision (budget), ledger maintaining etc have been made improvement.

Distribution of low qualities inputs are also found in Field monitoring in LIF projects which were improved by suggesting, repurchasing, giving load of additional activities.

B. Installment released but project was not initiated:

This case was observed by technical monitoring team (SADO, FDO, RLSO, DPC, DPC & Journalist) visited on 31^stJan..2006 in Buddha Krishak Samuh, Haranamur-1. At the time of monitoring, all the members were collected & informed about the duration of installment. After that, they have initiated the project & second installment has been released to the farmers group.

In F.Y. 2063/64 Bahuudhyasiya Fish & Pig Rearing Group, Patana-7, Laxmi Saving & Credit Group, Parsoiya-8/9, Jayma Kali Samudaik Sanstha, Dohani-5, Dafe Samudaik Sanstha, Pakadi-7, Satyam, Sundaram, Kamal Saving & Credit Groups, Dumara-4, Shiv Taja Veg. Production Group, Tilaurakot-1, Samay Farmers Group, Baluhawa-4, Samay & Chadani Saving Group, Dohani – 2 & 1, Hariyali Farmers Group, Baluhawa-1, Bishal Mishrit Group, Baidauli-3 & few others LIF projects have been not utilized their installment properly. Therefore, they have not performed their activities in project period. Hence they would not get their installment due to DADC meeting decision.

C. Less use of Agriculture Implements:

This case was observed by technical monitoring team dated on 18^thFeb..2006 in Garivi Niwaran Samudayik Sanstha & Saraswati Samudayik Sansthas, Dohani-4 Mainihawa under LIF. These groups were installed Treadle pumps for vegetable production from first installment amount. But they were not using for the purpose of irrigation. They were awared & initiated to make use of the treadle pumps by using bamboo & planting vegetable seeds of spring season.

Another case was found in Jan Adarsh Samajik Kendra (S.P) , Barakulpur visit of 24^th Dec.2005. This S.P. has implemented one irrigation project in Janachetana Krishak Samuh, Buddhi-2. Where electric motor was purchased but not installed due to electric supply near installation spot. Therefore, team has suggested to co-ordinate with concerned stakeholder to supply electricity. So that farmers can benefited as soon as possible.

In F.Y. 2063/64 Banganga Dairy Milk Production Co. Org. Ltd., Banganga, Siddartha Bazaar Bikash Committee, Gajehada, Jansewa Samajik Sanstha, Parshoiya, King Project, Taulihawa, Adarsh Manav Utthan Sanstha, Haranampur, SICO, Kopawa have been suggested to make proper way of agriculture implements machines & instruments.

D. Staff salary claimed but not mobilized in field:

This case fount in Sarwanging vikash Kendra, Shihokhor by monitoring team (DPC, DLSO, DPA & J.T) dated 25^th feb.2006. This S.P. has claimed salary of 3 month for social mobilizer, was not mobilized in group regularly. So that the monitoring team has made a note to reduce the salary amount claimed. Side by side the S.P has claimed tonic for goats, but the team was not found any residue or packet or Bottle from farmers. The S.P was made to distribute the tonic.

Many cases have been found not mobilizing the technical staff as well as social mobilizer in the field. They have been punished by deducting their installment amount.

E. Project change:

· First case was found by monitoring team (SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA) dated 15^th Dec.2005 in Shivshakti Machha Mahila Krishak Samuh, Dohani-3, Mainihawa. This group has implemented on fish farming project & Rs.15000.00 released in first installment from that amount they has kept fingerlings in leased pond & purchased bran, lime, cake & used. But pond owner has harvested growing fish slowly. So that, the team has suggested to change the program according to their needs. This project was converted in Goat raising. Now, they are happy.

· Another case was found in Niharika Samajhik Seva Kendra, Manpur by monitoring team (SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA) dated 25^th Dec.2005. The S.P has implemented fish farming project in lease. That group was not properly used due to water & pond owner problem. So that, the project was converted into off seasonal vegetable production with treadle pump.

· In F.Y. 2063/64 one case was found in Mukti Samajik Bikash Kendra, Dharmapaniya-7 which was duplication with LFP projects, was converted in to boring pump set.

· And another one fish project of Tauleshwarnath Bahuudhyasia Farmers Group, Pakadi-6 has been change in to Goat Rearing Project. Like wise, another irrigation boring project of Ghaghawa Jal Upabhokata Samuh, Patana and fish farming project of Jyoti Fish Farmer Group have been changed in to Treadle Pump.

F. Trying to Misuse the fund

After submission of bills receipt with recommendation of BMC, key persons of the farmers group has shown the pond other to technical monitoring committee and staff that technical have kept & fertilize, feds of fish have been supplied from 1st installment of Rs 15000/ according to TMC report 2nd installment has been paid & amount of Rs.7000/. As the receiving of 3rd installment area in charge of Moist asked with chair person & treasure regarding the expenditure. During the enquiry they have beaten to chair person & treasure. Fact has been found out & they have made to change the activities in to goat keeping according to consent of group members. Treasure become agrees to refund the amount. Group has in charge distributed 15 goats in presence of local in charge. Goats have been tagged & tablets of internal parasite have been fed.

Similar type of case was happened in Maya Devi Multipurpose Women Farmers Group. Titirkhi-6, project was contracted for fish production by 20 female farmers. Key person of the group were trying to cheat other members. Two times group has been informed at the time of monitoring. Once, monitoring team of SADO, FDO, DPC, DPA & Journalist has visited there & meeting of group members, local leader in charging NCP moist. They have conducted to purchase 22 goats. They were tagged & anti parasite tables have been fed.

In F.Y.2063/64 Ganga Saving Group, Parsoiya, Ganga Farmers Group, Haranampur-2, Birendra Bahuudhyasia Farmer Group, Tilaurakot, Dalit Jagarn Group, Hariharpur, Laxmi & Niharika Farmers Group, Rangpur, Unnati Goat, Dalit Pig, Loharauli Goat and Ram Poultry Farmers group, Basantpur, Jivikoparjan, Samuhik Women Poultry, Kishan Goat, Dalit Women Goat Rearing Group, Parshoiya Marahimai Samudaik Sanstha, Maharajgunj, Jankalyan, Araniko, Jaykali & Jaybuddha Saving Group, Abhirawa, Bishnu, Nawadurge, Laxmi Dalit Sewa Samuh of Dohani-4, Siddhartha Pasu Bikash Group, Mahuwa-2, Janaki B.U.Farmers Group, Maharajgunj-1, Kapilmuni Women Farmers Group, Kapilvastu-12 and Nawadurga Farmers Group, Balaramawapur have trying to misuse the fund which have been made in proper line.

19. Some of the controlling mechanism initiated

· Program orientation of SPs before project agreement by DSU.

· Project Orientation before commencing the project in the field by SPs.

· Program Board (LIF/DEF implemented projects.)

· Regular S.P. co-ordination meeting

· Discussion with BMC about DEF projects before approval.

· VDC label Orientation by concerned S.P. before program implementation.

· Review meeting by concerned S.P.

· BMC Meeting

· Publishing the details of the project in the newspaper time to time and displaying the paper cutting in public places.

· Public Audit

· Labeling on material distributed (like Treadle pump, Sprayer, rose cane, pump set, motor, milk cane etc.)

· Displaying of financial summary of the project board. in project side .

· Using FM Radio, cable, daily /weekly new paper, Telephone, mobile medium of communication.

· Publishing the name of standard & sub standard work performed SPs.

· Make submission of photocopies of account passbook.

· Checking of account, store, meeting room in SP office & farmers groups.

20. Leaf let pamphlet publication

In fiscal year2061-62

LIF introduction folder in Nepali and Abadhi (local language).
Fish and Banana farming folder

In fiscal year2062-63

1. A glance on APPSP-2062: containing details of APPSP, DADF, Process of fund release, proposal submission & evaluation, different types of committees & their role & responsibility, profile of DEF & LIF projects, maps showing coverage of VDCs. Few articles on package and practices of TPS, Potato & tomato, Problems and solution of opening grazing system of Kapilvastu, PPR of goats and sheep's, Human development is foundation of physical development, Few program photos, Information of about district

2. Calendar of 2062/63: containing super goal, goal & purpose of APPSP, fund flow & quotation for awareness.

3. Goat Rearing: Package and practices of goat management.

4. Rainy season of onion farming

5. Bee keeping: Package and practices of bee-keeping.

6. Pig Rearing: Package and practices of pig management.

7. Vegetable Nursery management booklet

8. Mushroom package and practices

In year 2063-64

9. Calendar of 2063/64: containing Monthly farming operation tips, A glance of DADF implementation photos, super goal, goal & purpose of APPSP ,fund flow & quotation for awareness.

10. Bee keeping: Package and practices of bee-keeping.

11. Ginger: Package and practices of ginger cultivation.

12. Social Mobilization Process: Containing 30pages process of social mobilization, SPs contact no., Calendar etc.

13. Modern Agriculture Technology : Package and practices of Seasonal & off seasonal veg., river belt veg., nursery, soil, rat control, neem, plant protection measure, sun flower, fish, papaya, banana, mushroom, bee-keeping, goat, pig, poultry etc. market day of kapilvastu, seed production technology, irrigation etc. of 247 pages.

14. A glance on APPSP-2064: containing details of APPSP, DADF, Process of fund release, proposal submission & evaluation, different types of committees, profile of DEF & LIF projects, maps showing coverage of VDCs, till now achievement under DADF implementation.

15. BMC roles and responsibility in nepali and Abadhi.

In year 2064-65

16. Publication of calendar indicating LIF and DEF of different year in map.

21. Major Agro-Inputs and Animals Distributed by DEF and LIF Project

· No of treadle pump 3280

No of tubewell 112

Pump set 69

Electric motor 39

Irrigation channel 8

sprayer 223

Water cane 689

Market stall 3

Goat 3442
He Goat 194

Pig 272

Buffalo 28

Chilling vat 1

Cane 22

Bee hive 287

Honey extractor 3
TPS (g) 948
Fish fingerlings 170010

Details of LIF and DEF inputs in Table 22

Table: 22

Major inputs, quantity and market value in Rs. of DEF LIF

Total Input

DEF Projects

LIF Projects

Input Type

Unit

Quantity

Market Value

Input Type

Unit

Quantity

Market Value

No of treadle pump

No.

1322

2644000

No of treadle pump

No.

1958

3916000

No of tubewell

No.

1880000

No of tubewell

No.

360000

Pump set

No.

1225000

Pump set

No.

500000

Electric motor

No.

280000

Electric motor

No.

110000

Irrigation channel

No.

580000

Irrigation channel

No.

580000

sprayer

No.

205000

sprayer

No.

141

352500

Water cane

No.

315

63000

Water cane

No.

374

74800

Market stall

No.

1120000

Market stall

No.

1120000

Goat

No.

2617

5234000

Goat

No.

825

1650000

He Goat

No.

127

508000

He Goat

No.

268000

Pig

No.

210

315000

Pig

No.

93000

Buffalo

No.

560000

Buffalo

No.

Chilling vat

No.

680000

Chilling vat

No.

680000

Cane

No.

33000

Cane

No.

33000

Bee hive & colony

No.

251

8032000

Bee hive & colony

No.

1152000

Honey extractor

No.

9000

Honey extractor

No.

TPS (g)

No.

788

35460

TPS (g)

No.

160

7200

Fish fingerlings

No.

56760

Fish fingerlings

No.

113250

Chick

No.

460

23000

Chick

No.

2377

118850

Total

23483220

Total

11128600

22. Outputs

Increased accessibility to the resources of remote rural, disadvantaged and poor communities.
Increased the capacity of NGO's, CBO'S, Co-operatives and farmer's groups.
Increased the irrigated area by treadle pump, boring, pump set, motor, dam construction and cropping intensity through integration of vegetable crop in cropping system.
Participatory approach has been increasing.
Developing of skill and enterprises poor and excluded families.
Generation of employment through involving in agriculture business, treadle pump & boring installation, purchasing goat & pig, involving of staff in project as technicians/non-technicians.
Increased the consumption rate of green and fresh vegetables.
Substitution of import of vegetable from India.
Use of improved seed, animal breed, fertilizers, micronutrients and pesticide has been increased.
Practice of selling vegetable is being increasing.
Utilization of natural resources, local and indigenous technology.
Agricultural area has been diversifying.
Empowerment of disadvantaged poor, & remote farmers group & farmers.
Mobilized local service providers (NGOs, CBOs & Cooperatives) in rural remote area.
Increase income level of farmers groups.
Adaptation of new improved vegetable production & live stock technology.

Increased accessibility to the resources

Increased the capacity of NGO's, CBO'S, Co-operatives and farmer's groups.

Increased women participation

Participatory approach is being increasing.

Developed skill and entrepreneurship of poor and excluded families.

Self employment generated

Output from different from products

Goat Population : 5163

(Rs 8.77Lakhs)

Buffalo Population : 28

(Rs 7 lakhs)

Poultry Population : 500

Chicken meat Prod.:3080k.g (Rs.41800)
Pig :210
Pork value ; Rs.14 lakhs
Milk Prod. :14000Liter (Rs.2.8 lakhs)

Irrigation area : 898 Ha

Vegetable Production area: 492875.63 Ha

Vegetable Production: 9085 MT

Productivity : 10.37MT/Ha
Vegetable marketed 5632.7 MT
Vegetable consumed :4552.2 MT
Income from Veg. sold : Rs.84.5 million

Cropping intensity: 190-230 % of project area

Average Income:

Mini.: Rs.5000

Max.:Rs.10000

Average: Rs.7500

23. Problems related to project implementation

Getting any information (data, records, progress) from SPs & FGs is difficult.
No bodies guide the illiterate farmers regarding proposal submission, installment release mechanism. Bill & receipt preparation & format fill up. So extra amount will expend. Therefore, no timely settlement of advance.
Deduction of 1.5% Taxation from DEF project make poor in qualitative service & inputs support to poor & excluded.
PPR infestation, outbreak in goat & non availability of proper breed of goat, pig & poultry.
Bird flue in poultry discourages the poultry farmers.
Non available of appropriate var. hybrid seed of high
Few cooperatives are non sustainable.
Advance settlement in end of F.Y. create problem in effectiveness of the project.
Activities incomplete but submit the complete report.
No proper knowledge of how to conduct the project activities (like technical activities, orientation meeting, public audit)
A vast amount are expending non program activities compare to previous year (tax, logistic support etc.).
Fishery failure due to water use in irrigation.
Dog biting problem to goat.
Lengthy and long process from proposal receivable to project implementation.
Budget release process is lengthy and untimely.
Approved budget has been not resealed.
District Monitoring Committee is not functional.
Due to illiterate, proposal submission by layman is difficult.
Poor capacity of service providers in the district will effect the project implementation.
Less manpower and equipments with S.P.
Problem of advance settlement in case of LIF.
Chances of duplication of the projects.
Supply of agri-inputs by few SPs. and FGs. are of low quantity and quality.
Contribution of SPs. & FGs. is not according to agreement.
Staff recruitment and their mobilization by SPs. is less.
Not proper participation of beneficiaries in proposal writing.
Lack of availability of quality agri. inputs in local market.
Unavailability of quality input in local market (Agro-vet)
Difficult to get Bamboo or wood for installment of treadle pump.
Lack of information to BMC regarding project details.
No maintaining of farmers group register accordingly & no regular meeting.

24. Learning

Regular monitoring is very effective for rectifying the difficulties in project implementation.
Displaying of program budget board in project spot in begining is very effective for awareness as well as transparent.
Organization of project orientation by SPs in beginning has made smooth implementation.
Program discussion with BMC members in DEF has supported for actual demand of the community.
SP's workshop has helped to share the knowledge experiences among the SPs.
Sharing workshop with Hardware's & Agro-vets has helped to supply quality materials and prevent unnecessary billing.
Tagging of goat has made to prevent duplication.
Labeling on agricultural implement (like sprayer, Treadle pump, pump set etc.) has made easily identified for APPSP program.
BMC meeting soon after the project agreement is effective.
Participation of DSU member in orientation, public audit & project monitoring is effective.

25. Issues

Difficult to process proposal received in two month period.
Due to absent of any key members of TSC difficult to forward evaluation and award process.
Due to unavailability of citizenship & account difficult to contract out of LIF projects timely.
Very long gap of proposal receiving, evaluation, approval & contract out will make difficult in program implementation.
Maximum time for administrative work will not permit for program monitoring.
Political situation (band) has affected the program implementation.
Fund release from DDC through Fund & Dist. Treasury Office makes difficult timely release of first installments.
Getting financial information from DADO for reporting in difficult.
Cheque transfer from one bank to other bank will make burden and extra expenses to LIF farmers groups.
Adjustment of first installment for LIF farmers groups is difficult.
Not release of all the approved budget has made difficult to pay installment.
Lack of man power in DSU, difficult to complete all the work efficiently.
Lack of training, visit to DSU staffs will affect the efficient work.
Less internalization for the program by DADO, DLSO staff
No timely response (financial/program related) from CSU will make, week to DSU in the district.
There is no marketing, institutional development, refresher, activities for sustainability of the program.
Advance on the account of DPA & settlement after joint signature is problem.

26. Recommendations

Monthly S.P. Coordination meeting should be provision
Monthly project staffs (Progress) meeting
Training on social mobilization, public Audit, report writing, proposal writing, account keeping, risk & organization Management, treadle pump, sprayer, pump set repair & maintenance training.
Training to Agriculture/Livestock technician regarding new/modern technology.
Additional reservation (Storage) of the PPR vaccine in emergency time.
Controlling against open grazing, cow dung burning.
Fish pound contracted one for long way period.
Better to adjust proposal submission according to fund flow that is quarterly.
To be made alternative provision in absence of key person.
Time period should be fixed by DADC & DDC for approval.
Quarterly processing certainly helps monitoring work.
Timely release of fund.
Post Office Bank account very much suitable to farmers group for transaction.
There should be timely response from CSU.
Follow up program must be required.

27.Case Study

DEF

A.Dalit Social Development Centre, Gotihawa was implemented one DEF project of goat rearing for income generation of Dalit community of Gotihawa VDC (southern part of Kapilvastu) in F.Y. 2061-62. That project was completed in F.Y. 2063 Baishak. In the project, there were 4 grps includes 60 households among them 22 female 58 Dalit & 2 others and 52 poor.

Total project cost was of NRs.500300.00 of that only NRs. 4 Lakhs was supported by DADF & 1 lakh of community contribution.

Project was lunched by conducting training on goat rearing, support in goat distribution (2 each persons) & other supporting activities like drenching, dipping, technical assistance.

Among the beneficiaries, Ms. Sohawati Pasi has told that she has made 11 goats from 2 goats during the 20 months period. She has earned Rs. 5300.00 by selling the goat kids & hegoats. At present she has 4 pregnant & puberty goats. Now, she is able to share her husband income level & spending the few amounts in educating the children as well as saving the money in group as a saving & credit activities.

Likewise Ms. Prem Sudha Raidash (Chamar) has position of having 12 goats & kids after death of 5 kids during the period from 2 pregnant goats. She has sold only of NRs. 4000.00. She has also encouraged from goat rearing occupation.

B.One DEF project conducted by Sunshine Social Development Centre, Dhankauli of agricultural activities for poverty alleviation in north bank of Banganga river ie Dhankauli 1,2,7,8,2,9 for 12 grps (279 HH, 229 Female, 167 Dalit, 82 Janjati) . DADF contribution was NRs. 5, 00,000.00. The project was completed in F.Y.2062-63.

One beneficiaries, Mr. Panch Ram Pasi (who is the member of Dalit Shriman Shrimati Saving Group, Dhankauli-9) has got 2 pig from same project which has made 20 pigs during the period of 12 months. He has earned Rs.4500.00 by selling per pig.

1.A case study of Namuna Krisak Samuh, Hathousa under DEF Project.

S.P. Name : Namuna Krisak Samuh

Address : Hathousa-8

Project Name : TPS Potato

Duration of the project : From 2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15

Total contribution : NRs. 269560

Community Contribution : NRs. 140160

SP contribution : NRs. 10000

APPSP contribution : NRs. 119400

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 50

Female : 5

Male : 45

Dalit : 4

DND : 8

UC : 38

Poor : 50

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Chandrakant Acharya

Treasurer Name : Mr. Tanknath Marasini

Support

No. of Participant : 50

Training on TPS Potato Production : 1days

TPS distribution : 600 gm

Pesticide & Micro Nutrient distribution : 50

Fertilizer distribution : 50 (Urea, DAP, MOP)

Sprayer tank : 2

Water cane : 5

Rented Cold Store : 1

Total area : 1Hec.

Production : 102.11 quintal

Expected Income : 10 Lakhs

Expected income/person : NRs.20000

Coverage area : 17 Hec.

2. A case study of Lumbini Integrated Development Organization under DEF Project.

S.P. Name : Lumbini Integrated Development Organization

Address : Manpur – 1

Project Name : Integrated Agriculture program for Ultra poor

Duration of the project : From 2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15

Total contribution : NRs. 581484

Community Contribution : NRs. 100454

SP contribution : NRs.

APPSP contribution : NRs. 481030

Details of Beneficiaries

No of Farmers Group: 10

Total : 182

Female : 103

Male : 79

Dalit : 4

Dis Jan : 84

Reli M. : 2

UC : 92

Poor : 182

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Mayraj Khan

Treasurer Name : Mr. Athar Kamal khan

Name of the group : Kotiyali Farmers group, Gajedha-3 Gangaulia

Chair man : Chandra panth

Support

Orientation

No. of beneficiaries : 50

Goat Rearing Management training:2

No of participant : 128

Program Board : 1

Sprayer tank : 10

Water cane : 57

Goat Distribution : 61

He goat Distribution : 3

Tagging : 64

Vaccination : 64

Medicine : 64

Public audit : 1

Achievements

House Hold benefited directly : 25

Expected area under irrigation : 3 hac.

Increment cropping density : 300 %

Expected income/person : Rs.15000/

3. A case study of Lumbini Samajik Sewa Kendra under DEF Project.

S.P. Name : Lumbini Samajik Sewa Kendra

Address : Jayanagar - 8

Project Name : Hat Bajar Management

Duration of the project : From 2063/08/ to 2064/04

Total contribution : NRs. 581474

Community Contribution : NRs. 20000

SP contribution : NRs. 10000

APPSP contribution : NRs. 581474

Details of Beneficiaries

No Of Farmers Group :19

Total : 312

Female : 186

Male : 126

Dalit : 80

DND : 50

Dis Jan : 63

Adv jan : 40

Reli M. : 6

UC : 73

Poor : 312

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Hem Raj Subedi

Treasurer Name : Mr. Tek Raj Poudel

Support

Orientation

No. of Participant : 50

Drainage Constrictions : 23*54 meters size

Marked Shed : 14

Total area : 1Hec.

Public audit : 1

Program Board : 1

Achievement

Increased space for market : 64 stalls

Increased access to the market : 312 Farmers of 6 VDCs

Future Plan : There will be bi- weekly market insted once in a week from inauguration.

Hygienic meat, fruit, fresh vegetable etc will be available to the consumer as well farmer could able to sell their agricultural and livestock products in proper rate in time.

4. A case study of Social Awareness & Development Organization under DEF Project.

S.P. Name : Social Awareness & Development Organization

Address : Banganga

Project Name : Pig rearing Program for Dalit

Duration of the project : From 2062/08/12 to 2063/08/11

Total contribution : NRs. 244570

Community Contribution : NRs. 16000

SP contribution : NRs. 6000

APPSP contribution : NRs. 222570

Details of Beneficiaries

No of Farmers Group: 2

Total : 42

Female : 26

Male : 16

Dalit : 32

Dis Jan : 9

Reli M. : 2

UC : 1

Poor : 42

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Lal Bdr Baudoli

Treasurer Name : Mr. Arjun. Raskoti

Support

No. of Participant : 42

Pig Rearing Management training : 2

Pig Distribution : 80

Shed construction : 80

Medicine : 80

Achievements:

Pig : 80 under production

Expected Income : Rs. 6 lakh

Expected income/person/ year : Rs. 8000/

Increased the capacity of the poor and excluded, have felt piggery as an entrepreneur.

5. A case study of Namuna Krisak Samuh, Hathousa under DEF Project.

S.P. Name : Namuna Krisak Samuh

Address : Hathousa-8

Project Name : TPS Potato

Duration of the project : From 2062/08/17 to 2063/01/15

Total contribution : NRs. 269560

Community Contribution : NRs. 140160

SP contribution : NRs. 10000

APPSP contribution : NRs. 119400

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 50

Female : 5

Male : 45

Dalit : 4

DND : 8

UC : 38

Poor : 50

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Chandrakant Acharya

Treasurer Name : Mr. Tanknath Marasini

Support

No. of Participant : 50

Training on TPS Potato Production : 1days

TPS distribution : 600 gm

Pesticide & Micro Nutrient distribution : 50

Fertilizer distribution : 50 (Urea, DAP, MOP)

Sprayer tank : 2

Water cane : 5

Rented Cold Store : 1

Total area : 1Hec.

Production : 102.11 quintal

Expected Income : 10 Lakhs

Expected income/person : NRs.20000

Coverage area : 17 Hec.

LIF

1. A case study of Laxmi Crop Production Group, Niglihawa-6 under LIF project.

Group Name : Laxmi Crop Production Group

Address : Niglihawa-7, Pachehara

Formation Date : 2062/06/07

Supporting agency : DADO, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : TPS Potato

Objective : Income generating & supply of TPS F Taber

Duration of the project : From 2062/08/07 to 2063/01/07

Total contribution : NRs. 29200

Group Contribution : NRs. 4200

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 18

Female : 5

Male : 13

Dalit : 17

DND : 1

Poor : 14

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Ram Brichha Kharbind

Treasurer Name : Mr. Gulab Kewat

Support

No. of Participant : 18

Training on TPS Nursery management : 2 days

IPM Training : 1 day

TPS distribution : 36 gm

Pesticide & Micro Nutrient distribution : 18

Fertilizer distribution : 18 (Urea, DAP, MOP)

Sprayer tank : 1

Water cane : 18

Total area : 14 Kattha

Production : 40 quintal (Stored in Laxmi cold store in Bhairahawa)

Expected Income : 4 Lakhs (If sold @ NRs. 100/kg)

Expected income/person : NRs.22000

Future Plan : Next year, are will be 4-5kattha/farmer

2. A case study of Siddhartha Multi-purpose Farmer Group under LIF project.

Group Name : Siddhartha Multi-purpose Farmer Group

Address : Titirkhi-3, Titirkhi

Formation Date : 2061/06/07

Supporting agency : DADO, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Fish Farming (Revised Goat rearing due to technical problem)

Objective : Income generating

Duration of the project : 6 months

Total contribution : NRs. 35935

Group Contribution : NRs. 10935

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 27

Female : 21

Male : 6

Dalit : 27

Poor : 15

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Surbal Harijan

Treasurer Name : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Raidash

Support

No. of Participant : 27

Training on fish farming : 1 day

3. Brief of Sita Vegetable Production group Under LIF Project.

Group Name : Sita vegetable production group

Address : Banskhor -7

Location : 11 K.M. from district head quarter in east

Formation Date : 2060/8/9

Supporting agency : Nepal SIMI, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Vegetable production

Objective : Income generation

Duration of the project : From 2063/07/26 to 2064/01/15 BS

Total contribution : NRs. 29950

Group Contribution : NRs. 4950

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 24

Female : 22

Male : 2

Dalit : 14

DND : 8

Poor : 22

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Sunarmati Chai

Treasurer Name : Mr.Daya Ram Yadav

Support

No. of Participant : 24

Training on Vegetable management : 1 days

Seed distribution : 24 Farmers

Fertilizer : 22 Farmers

Sprayer : 1

Water cane : 24

Micro nutrients : 18 Farmers

Treadle Pump : 5

Project board : 1

Achievement

Increased area under irrigation : 12 kattha

Vegetable Production : 19 quintal

Income : Rs. 26,000/

Income/person : Rs. 1500/

Future Plan : Next year, there will be double the area of vegetable production intensive cultivation.

4. A Brief of Durga Dalit Utthan group Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa, Under LIF Project.

Group Name : Durga Dalit Utthan group

Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa

Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in south

Formation Date : 2063/7 /30

Supporting agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Goat Rearing

Objective : Income generating & DALIT women empowerment

Duration of the project : From 2063/07/30 to 2064/02/30 B.S.

Total contribution : NRs. 31625

Group Contribution : NRs. 6625

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 15

Female : 15

Male :

Dalit : 15

DND : 0

Poor : 15

Name of the chairperson : Ms. Chanarmati Pasi

Treasurer Name : Ms. Shubhawati Pasi

Support

No. of Participant : 15

Training on Goat rearing management : 1 day

Goat distribution : 14

He Goat distribution : 1

Tagging : 15

Vaccination : 15

Achievement

Goat number : 14

Pregnant : 4

Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)

Future Plan : Next year, there will be a 4 times more no. of Goats.

Learnt about goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.

5. A Brief of Maya Devi Gautam Dalit Utthan Group under LIF Project.

Group Name : Maya Devi Gautam Dalit Utthan Group

Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa

Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in south

Formation Date : 2062/2 /5

Supporting agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Goat Rearing

Objective : Income generating & DALIT women empowerment

Duration of the project : From 2063/06/30 to 2064/02/30

Total contribution : NRs. 31625

Group Contribution : NRs. 4665

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 14

Female : 14

Male : 0

Dalit : 14

DND : 0

Poor : 14

Name of the chairperson : Ms. Laxmi Pasi

Treasurer Name : Ms. Sonmati Raidash

Support

No. of Participant : 14

Training on Goat rearing management : 1 days

Goat distribution : 13

He Goat distribution : 1

Tagging : 14

Vaccination : 14

Project board : 1

Achievement

Goat number : 14

Buck : 1

Pregnant : 4

Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)

Future Plan : Next year, there will be a 4 times more no. of Goats.

Learnt about goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.

6. A Brief of Saraswati Income group Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa, Under LIF Project.

Group Name : Saraswati Income group

Address : Kapilvastu – 7 Bargadawa

Location : 2 K.M. from district head quarter in south

Formation Date : 2063/4 /30

Supporting agency : FEDO, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Goat Rearing

Objective : Income generating & DALIT women empowerment

Duration of the project : From 2063/07/30 to 2064/02/30

Total contribution : NRs. 31625

Group Contribution : NRs. 6625

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries

Total : 15

Female : 15

Male :

Dalit : 15

DND : 1

Poor : 15

Name of the chairperson : Ms. Chanarmati Pasi

Treasurer Name : Ms. Shubhawati Pasi

Support

No. of Participant : 15

Training on Goat rearing management : 1 days

Goat distribution : 14

He Goat distribution : 1

Tagging : 15

Vaccination : 15

Project board : 1

Goat number : 14

Achievement

Goat number : 14

Buck : 1

Pregnant : 4

Increased number of goat Kids : 5 (1 male and 4 female kids)

Future Plan : Next year, there will be a 4 times more no. of Goats.

Learnt about goat rearing system, increased the access to resources and services.

7. A Brief of Tauleshwar Nath Vegetable Farmers group Under LIF Project.

Group Name : Tauleshwar Nath vegetable farmers group

Address : Gotihawa -7

Location : 6 K.M. from district head quarter in south

Formation Date : 2060/12/9

Supporting agency : DAD Office, Kapilvastu.

Project Name : Vegetable production

Objective : Income generation

Duration of the project : From 2063/08/4 to 2064/02/4 BS

Total contribution : NRs. 32750

Group Contribution : NRs. 7500

APPSP contribution : NRs. 25000

Details of Beneficiaries Total : 18

Female :

Male : 18

Dalit : 6

DND : 9

R M :2

Others :1

Poor : 18

Name of the chairperson : Mr. Madhav Ahir

Treasurer Name : Mr. Hari krishana yadav

Support

No. of Participant : 18

Training on Vegetable management : 1 days

Vegetable Seed distribution : 18 Farmers

Fertilizer : 18 Farmers

Spray : 1

Micronutrients : 18 Farmers

Treadle Pump : 7

Project board : 1

Achievement

Increased area under irrigation : 25 kattha

Crops : Bhendi, cow pea, Chilly, Bottle gourd, Sponge gourd

Vegetable Production : 35 quintal (still under harvest)

Income : Rs. 36,000/

Income/person /season : Rs. 1600/

Future Plan : Next year, there will be double the area of vegetable production intensive cultivation.

8. A case study of Shahasi Farmers group, Gajedha-6 Karmanaha under LIF Project.

Name of the group : Shahasi Farmers group, Gajedha-6 Karmanaha

Chair man : Parwati Khanal

Support

Orientation

No. of beneficiaries : 50

Goat Rearing Management training : 2

No of participant : 128

Program Board : 1

Sprayer tank : 10

Water cane : 235

Goat Distribution : 270

He goat Distribution : 7

Tagging : 277

Vaccination : 277

Medicine : 277

Bee hive : 27

Public audit : 1

Achievements of visiting Group

House Hold benefited directly : 27

Honey production : 400 Kg

Income : Rs. 60000/

Expected income/person/ year : Rs.13000/ .

Mr Rajendra Khatik a member of Jan kalian Farmers group, Hariharpur 1 was received one treadle pump (TP) among 5 TP in group and hybrid veg seed, one sprayer. He succeeded to grow cauliflower in 1.5 kathha and he produced 4 quintal cauliflower, earned about Rs2900 after consumption of 12 members in family.

In summer season he succeed to grow 125 kg tomato and 1 quintal radish, he earned about 6000 rupees. Now he has become model farmers in his village. He started sending hi children in school . He also succeded to cure cronic urinary problem of long time.

By learning from him Shova Raids has also started doing in his path for better income.

Part 2

28. Summary of Lesson Learning Workshops.

Lesson Learning Workshop of District Agriculture Development Fund, Kapilvastu
Venue : DADO, Kapilvastu					Date :2065/5/10
Participants : DADC members
No. of Participants : 19
Facilitator : Mr. Padam Bd. Shakya, Mr. Ram Mani Poudyal
Ques :	DADF as a process and mechanism for decentralized service delivery
S.N	Description of Strength	Priority	Description of Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for Weakness
1	DADF inclusive & Justifiable	1	Proposal evaluation process long & trouble some	1	Simplify evaluation
2	Implementation process is inclusive	5	Social mobilize & Technical support is not available	3	Support of Social mobilize and Technical support
3	Based on LSGA 2055, Bylaws & guidelines purposed	2	No profit tools of financial proposal evaluation	4	Tolls of financial proposal evaluation
4	Bottom up demand driven	4	less budget but more installments	2	At least 50,000 for LIF
5	Local organization are priorities	3

S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Participatory mentality immerged from small amount support	1	Negative image of community with less budget	1
2	Capacity building of community	2	No assurance of many groups with lack of continuation	2
3	Opportunity of local organization in Agriculture & Livestock's	3	Recommended Action
	Recommended Action		Need to increase the fund limit
1	DADF continuation		Initiative taken for DADF continue & matching fund
2	Organization form to forms groups
3	Special attention to organization development
Ques :	DADF’s ability to target Poverty and Social Exclusion
S.N	Description of Strength	Priority	Description of Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for Weakness
1	Opportunity to local NGOs for project	2	No sustainable development program	3	APPSP should be assured
2	Priority given to dalit, poor, women in evaluation process	1	Skill needed to reach to real poor	1	Implementation of program in disadvantaged people & area

S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Opportunity for poor, dalit, janjati & remote, RM	1	Hearing no continuation of APPSP	1
2	Opportunity for emerged small NGO	3	Due to political instability, not reached to real poor	2
3	Very good opportunity APPSP in Kapilvastu	2	Due to illiteracy	3

Ques :	Transparency, monitoring and accountability of DADF
S.N	Description of Strength	Priority	Description of Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for Weakness
1	Public notice in News paper & board, Program orientation, BMC meeting , Public audit	1	Information only for formality	3	Effective information system
2	Self participation of farmers in different community	1	BMC formed from SP	2	BMC inclusion after discussion
3	Self evaluation by BMC	2	Not accountable after project completion	1	Follow up Program
4	Monitoring by district level, different committee & concerned line agencies	4	No feasibility study during selecting project	4	Feasibility study
5	Monitoring by central unit	3

S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Able to mobilize local resource	3	on the spot monitoring by stakeholder	2
2	Institutional promotion & extension	4	Illiteracy, poverty, irrigation, traditional culture, custom, weak agriculture etc.	1
3	Participation of local NGO in program	1
4	Target group benefited based on program objective	2

Lesson Learning Workshop of SPs
Venue : IRDC, Jaynagar and KSSC Taulihawa, Kapilvatu					Date : 2065/4/30,31
Participants :Service Provides
Facilitator : Mr. Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
Repoter : Shakti Karki
Ques	Quality of Service Delivery by SPs/NGOs
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Conducted by local organization.		Very less amount approved against community demand		Need to approved amount according to demanded amount
2	Priority for poor & excluded in selection criteria		Very less duration makes poor discouraged.		At least 2 yrs project duration
3	Monitored by BMC from beneficiaries		Project selection process is very lengthy, hence negative views from community and SP		With in 2 months period
4	Demand from poor & excluded group & proposed from them		No provision for affiliation of group in cooperative while evaluation		Cooperative formation
5	Public Audit from P&E group & PCR preparation		No impotence of local cooperative while evaluation		Priority to local cooperation
6	Open Proposal call & through out the year submission		Without information 1.5% tax deduction make difficulty in project execution		No tax deduction
7	Ordinary groups of the village, can submit Rs. 25000.00 proposal		Not continuity of program		Continuity in Program
8	NGO farmers representative related line agencies involved in proposal evaluation.		Not sufficient Rs 10 lakhs		At least 20 lakhs
9	Focused to dalit & janjatiin the group		Not believing the receipt of farmers.		Accept only receipts
10			Not timely monitoring		timely monitoring
11	Meeting conducted by chairman of FG & groups		Not market activities		Market program
12			Contribution from farmers is very difficulty		Need to community for contribution
13			Lack of skilled technician		At least 70% in first installment
14					Overhead should be at least 30%
15					Need to issue ex private certificate
16					Based on poverty program implemented
17					Classification/grading of SP based work performance
18					Dalit, janjati & monitoring are included while selecting project

S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Opportunity to local organization		Barrier in project implementation due to financial year bondage (limit)
2	Program focused to P&E group		Not timely agreement and deduction of amount has made dispute in target group
3	Prestige gain from target group		Very difficulty to cope with community due to less fund them other donors
4	Coordination & accessibility of P&E group been developed at high level		Political instability makes difficulty in timely project execution
5	Opportunity of employment & leadership development to disadvantaged group		Suspect to SPs from community
6	Organization development from overhead cost		Many times office visiting for installment & advance settlement
7	Support in irrigation		Political of community
8	support in income generating agriculture system		Categories based on caste
9	Increased income level of farmers		Illiterate of target group
10	More opportunity for dalit & janjati		Rich people are feeling jealous to poor
11	Development of Modern Agriculture system for rural marginalized area		No clear concept of government & political party on NGOs
	Opportunity for capacity building
	Groups are developing in cooperative/Cos
	Ordinary farmers able to leave skilled develop leadership

Ques	Poor and Exclusion targeting
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Proposal preparation based on community demands		Not approved based on proposed budget		At least Rs.10 lakh
2	Improvement of Agri. & livestock system of the community		No provision of observation, training & visit		Training & visit program
3	Use of local resource & skill		No timely monitoring & installment release		Timely monitoring
4	Monitoring by beneficiaries		Likely to partials in selection		Clarity
5	Priority of local organization in service delivery		No Provision of proposal writing & organization development training		As proposal
6	Inclusive Program		Saying long APP but short plan		Training on proposal writing & organization development
7	Project orientation & social audit provisioned		No inclusion in TSC		Dalit & janjati in TSC
8	Ownership to work to the SPs		Duplication in advice by DADO		uniformly in advice
9	Proposal received from local group		Lengthy process & trouble some		two installment
10	Continuation of proposal submission		TSC is not accountable for processing		Empowerment of TSC
11	Priority to dalit, janjati, P&E group		Not bimonthly proposal open & timely evaluation		Bimonthly
12	Participation of community at Implementation & Monitoring
13	Effective implementation in conflict situation
			Deduction of 1.5% tax and also submission of bills & receipts
			No proper negotiation while budgeting		Alternative, better way
			No good relation by DSU & DADO
			No activity for sustainable division
			Org. development & capacity building concept activity
			No contingency amount
			No tools of community analysis
			Unhealthy completion of among SPs & no proper facilitation work



S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Good coordination and relation among SP, program community		Cost increment
2	Opportunity for local people employment		1.5% taxation
3	poverty reduction of local level		Pressure to complete project at end of F.Y
4	institution development		Political instability
5	opportunity for local resources & materials use		No market management
6	Direct benefit among local people		Negative attitude of political & government to NGOs
	Opportunity for Kapilvastus' people		Pro poor are not inclusion in program
	Opportunity for Agri. & Livestock project implementation
	Extension of coordination with APPSP and Nepal SIMI

Ques	Transparency, monitoring and timely support
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Open proposal call system		No budget allocated based on negotiation
2	Transparency in proposal evaluation		Minimum salary of technical & no timely to technician
3
4	Transparency in implementing process		Open not limit of Rs.10lakh
5	Budget in installment basis		Appreciation for poor performance
6	Recommendation for budget demand by BMC
7	Orientation to BMC regarding
8	All project activity & budget
9	Decision of purchasing committee
10	Monitoring by BMC
11	Monitoring by SP member & meeting with group chairperson
12	District level on the spot monitoring
13	Public Audit
14	Board displayed
15	Orientation before project implementation
16	Incentive/Priority to timer completed SPs
17	Immediate monitoring & settlement after bill/receipts submitted
18	Financial dealing through bank
19	Labeling on material & tagging to group
	Appreciate to community contribution
	Orientation to SP by APPSP before agreement		No provision of group exchange monitoring		Need of farmers group visit
			Monitoring made to destroy the image of SPs		Without image effected
			Late installation due to late monitoring		Monitoring in time
			No gathering of farmers in monitoring on farming peak period		Farmers freeform work
			No man power in public audit		Manpower in public audit
	Publication of notice of approved SPs groups in local news paper with amount				Improved of information system
	Frequent monitoring has made expected output achevivement
	Easy to ammendent/ ratify the project


S.N	Description of Opportunity	Priority	Description of Threat	Priority
1	Available skilled manpower in NGOs		1.5% taxation make in comfortable
2			Not timely release of installation
3			Late in monitoring due to various reason
4	Self monitoring & evaluation of program		Traditional & lack of awareness
5	SP has got opportunity in Agriculture area & up gradation		Political instability
6	Opportunity modern farming against traditional one		Castism/caste conflict in society
7	50 % income incresed to low income farmers		No interest of community contribution
8	Opportunity of knowdge & skill development		No beilive on NGO
9	P&E are directly involved		Difficult in conflict period
	Faith of community on SP
	Easy to work in new program implementation		Tradition thinking of political party, government & community on NGO
	Pressure to government & other agencies to be accountable & transparent		Budget approvel not based on need of community

Lesson Learning Workshop of DEF Beneficiaries
Venue : Agriculture Service Centre, Pakadi, Maharajgunj, Kopawa					Date : 2064/4/22,23,27
Participants : DEF Beneficiaries
Facilitator : Mr. Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
Repoter : Shakti Karki
Ques	Quality of Service Delivery by SPs/NGOs
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Support from Local Organization to Rural Disadvantaged people		No timely started projects		If projects are approved at time,
2	Awareness to women & disadvantaged from local NGOs		No timely monitoring		Timely monitoring
3	Effective program by various monitoring		Less amount approved		Provision of collection centre at market program
4	More effective due to community based project		No provision of capacity building of farmers group		Extinction of project time
5	Project monitoring by BMC which is made from beneficiaries		No provision of market management of agri. Product		Re project implementation program
6	Inpurts are purchased by purchasing committee (made from beneficiaries)		No continuty of program		At least Rs.5000.00 per person
7	Timely training		No intiative for next phase program		At least 2 years project duration
1	Project monitoring by technicians and other related agents and they provide necessary		Problem in project implentation due to less amount		Training provided to technicians about new technology
2	Public audit, project orientation which is provided the qulitative service by SPs		Short duration		Provision of cooperative community organization to groups
3	Proposal preparation through demand based		Unskilled technicians		Signature of BMC at bills/receipts amount provided at group account
4	Program implementation is more effective by local NGOs		No provision of organization development & sustainbility of farmers group		Contract out with BMC or chaireman of groups
5	Signature verification of BMC before the contract out
1	Priority of Local NGOs		SPs are not intrested to provide account statement		BMC or chairman of groups
2	Project approved based on P & E, women physibility		Not caring of beneficiaries		No timely approved contract out
3	Inputs are purchased from purchasing committee		No rights of beneficiaries		capacity building training for farmers group
4	No provision of punishment to misusers' SPs		Project complition at fast		Long duration
5			No program of capacity building		Long duration
6			No avaibility of commercial based service		Verufy of new SPs skill
7			Project approved of disqualified SPs		At least Rs. 10 lakh
8			Not provided demanded amount		At least 1 years project duration
9			Short project duration & not to continuity

Ques	Poor and Exclusion targeting
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Srvice delivary for farmers group formation through P & E groups		P&E group are not much benefited		Need to more emphasis on P&E
2	Priority to P&E for proposal evaluation		Not faith on P&E group speech		P&E motive
3	Need identification of P&E for proposal preparation]		Defict in P&E allocated budget		SP should support P&E with open heart
4	Most priority of P&E to service delivery		Monitroing & evaluation not in timely		Timely monitoring
5	Inclusion of P&E in decision making		No much access of P&E due to short period		Project duration increased
6	Inclusion of women, janjati & dalit in project		No capacity building to P&E group		Training, visit for capacity building
7			As said limit amount of Rs.10 lakh, will not received		Fund limit should be wider
1	P&E are included at the time of group formation		Monopoly of SPs in group formation		Well being ranking too development
2	Approval of project based on P&E demand		Not much benefited due to illiterate		Adult litracy, awareness
3	Monitoring by BMC has help satisfactory benefit		Monopoly on BMC formation		Acivity related to BMC strenth and P&E inclusion
4	BMC formed with in beneficiaries		Lack of awareness and not capacity building training		Need to aware & information
5	Purchsing committee formed target group		SP not received the demended amount		More than Rs.10 lakhs
6	Targeted P&E group are participated from target group		Short period poject not empowered the P&E		More than 1 years project duration
7	Project & priority for poor		No interest shown after completion work		follow up program needed
1	Focus to P&E, demand based program (P&E demand)		No quality work due to timely service provided		Timely approval & installment
2	To approve according to P&E as quick		More contribution from community has made exclusion from getting service		Community contribution based on economic status
3	More marking for remote areas' female, dalit		Less grant amount		Rs. 10 lakhs for 200 HH
4	To searching the P&E for proposal preparation by SPs		No institution development and capacity building activity of P&E		cooperative registration for institution development
5	Support in social work		No additional work after irrigation facility		High value income crop
6	Opportunity to evaluation the project themselves		No sufficient support/service available		package based
7	Transparent to all the P&E service delivery program of the district		Propoor of rural area are not showing intereast to participate		Information by local level agebcies
8	Sport for infrastructure		Rich people are jealious from poor since they are getting facility		Rich people shond participal
9	Support to landless people		Difficulties in livelihood improvement from short duration project		Long duration
10	In beginning, P&E are supported first
11	Poor selected through well beginning method


Ques	Transparency, monitoring and timely support
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Proposal preparation after disscussion in community		No program for BMC activeness		Training to BMC
2	Project implementation based on BMC decision		No proper discussion with BMC & SPs while implementation project		Regular discussion with BMC & chairman of group
3	Made aware through about program orientation workshop
4	Priority & support to P&E group
5	Public Audit
6	Labeling & tagging to goat
7	Regular inspection & monitoring
8	BMC managed for monitoring
9	Regular monitoring by APPSP
10	Regular monitoring by SP staff and members
11	Monitoring by BMC
12	SP performed their responsibility accordingly
13	BMC accountable for installment release and expenditure
14	Material purchased quite cheaper and of quality with BMC & SP together
15	Implementation & Input distributed in participation of BMC
16	BMC are oriented in at time of agreement		BMC are only awarded about budget
17	Discussion with community at the time of proposal preparation		No provision for keeping in group account allocated for group
18	All stockholder called at the time of Public audit		No provision of inter group visit/monitoring		Inter group visit needed
19	Purchasing committee format		Awarded to best group implementation		Award required
20	On the spot monitoring		No provision to make contract with ASC		More responcibility to ASC
21	Timely seed support		No enough technician advice & support		Full time staff
22	Timely service delivery by SP staff		No activity of group capacity building		Long duration training required
23	Timely treadle pump installation
24	Timely medicine & vaccination support
25	Hording board publicity displayed		short project period
26	One day program orientation		No completion of project in time due to no timely release
27	BMC formation, different line agency involved in monitoring		Less budget for implementing project to SP
28	Fund release after monitoring only		BMC formed but not actively participate
29	Public audit		Very less amount disbursed while approving than proposed
30	Monitoring by beneficiaries		No capacity building & organization development for SPs

Lesson Learning Workshop of LIF Beneficiaries
					Date : 2064/4/24,28,29
Venue : Agriculture Service Centre, Buddhi, Gotihawa, Bahadurgunj
Participants : LIF Beneficiaries
Facilitator : Mr. Makbool Ali, Shree Bhagawan Thakur
Repoter : Shakti Karki
Ques	LIF Process(proposal call, evaluation, project selection, awarding, fund disbursement process and service provision to beneficiaries)
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Proposal submission based on P&E groups' needs		Less amount to group
2	Fund available as a grant without deposit		No timely & seasonally approved of proposal
3	Installment release system on BMC recommend		Not travel cost for group reaching to district
4	Improvement in economical status		No timely monitoring & installation release
5	Participation in social & religious work		Problem in proposal written
6	Monitoring of group work by BMC		Preparing bills & receipts
7	Training based on enterprises/activity		Many visit to office for installment release
8	Work based on group interest project		No aware of proposal format
9	Purchasing committee for buying the material		No training for proposal writing
10	Joint account
11	Development of participatory concept
12	Service delivery in come generation based on identification of P&E				Rs.50-60 thousands
13	Self need identification		No technical support		Technical support
14	No misuse of fund due to monitoring by community		No sustainable work for group		Long duration
15	Providing opportunity for learning through monitoring by APPSP		Short project duration		Apporval within one month of submision
5	Amount deposit in group account		Selection period is long		Provision of TADA
6	Technical skill development through less amount for IGA		No logistic & Travel cost		Timely monitoring
7	Work efficiency & awareness incensement		No budget based on work plan		In two installment
8	Development in participatory concept		Late in monitoring		Incresement of amount
9	Effective project execution due to self evaluation		Problem in project conductance by many monitoring
10	Getting opportunity by self emerged group as other existing group		Not technical support from govt. agency
	Fund demand based on group interest		Not sufficient for all the group member for minimum amount
1	Timely approval of project which is proposed by group		Input support but not technical support		Technical staffs
2	Poor, Dalit group are driven by group itself		Not sufficient for completing work activity by Rs.25000		Rs.50-60 thousands
3	Many times monitoring		Not expected outcome in short duration		At least one year
4	Various castes are sitting together
5	Fund mobilization by community and contribution as labor and cash		Regular training activity		Need base training
6	Participation of male, female & ethnic caste		Feeling complexity due to no interest of staff		Provision for allowances
7			Not budget sufficient for goat activity, No participation in purchasing committee		Rs. 3000.00 for one goat, Inclusive purchase committe

Ques	Poor and Exclusion targeting
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	Affiliated in group		Lack of awareness to P&E
2	Prority to P&E Women in proposal evaluation.		Lack of education to P&E.
3	Self decision and freedom to for purchasing the materials.		Less Accessibility.
4	Opportunity for account operation.		Not association of P&E in farmers group.
5	Transparent when women & Dalit are in executive committee.		no insolvent institution development activities.
6	Direct service delivery to P&E women Group.		Not sufficient 25000/		Must one lakh realese.
7	better opportunity to IGA for self reliance from grant.		Not support for group mobilization.
8	Self reliance to P&E women helps in full filling the donor objectives.		Not travel allowance for person visiting in district.
1	information from local level to district.		Lack of communication facilities.
2	Proposal submission according to group objectives from laborious and honest				Awareness creation.
3	Program transparent.		Not training for capacity building.
4			No information for group meeting & no casing for meeting.		2 installment.
5	Better selection process.		Installment release without proper exercise.
6	Training provided.		No knowledge for quality of seed.
			No timely information by DADO& DLSO staff regarding service & support.
1	priority to P&E Dalit, women in group formation.		Difficult to propor & illiterate in group to involve in group.		Awareness creation
2	Women in veil are also involved in group.		No provision for technical staff.		provision for technical staff.
3	less possibility to misuse of funded to account payee check operation system.		No provision of staff support in preparing proposal , Bills and receipts.		Facilition for my agency or sttaffs.
4	Allocated approved amount project implementation by collective decision based on discussion.		Lengthy and costly poor administration for to illiterate people.		Payment bassed on group application in 2 installment.
5	Support in livelihood of P&E from approved budget.		In sufficiency for all members for 25000/		Rs.75000/-
6	Involvement up P&E dalit women in BMC.
7	P& E have benefited from APPSP so it needs to extension.

Ques	Transparency, monitoring and timely support
S.N	Strength	Priority	Weakness	Priority	Recommended Action for weakness
1	project Board displayed.		No timely monitoring
2	Project implemented based on BMC decision awareness creation on project to all members.		Problem in project implementation.
3	Training to group members.
4	awareness creation on project to all members.
5	Group Account operating.
6	Funded release based on BMC decision.		No aware while expending amount		Bill settlement based on group decision.
7	Lebeling on materials like T.P. & sprayers.		No capable of BMC.		Training to BMC.
8	Information on grant provided by APPSP & their expenditure process.		No reguler meeting of group.		Support on socialmobilization.
9	BMC are called in DSU at the time of approval
10	Expenditure based on Group decisin				awareness creation.
11	Transparency in community through Board		Not awarness creation due to uneducated.		Necessary made after the decisin from all the farmers
12	Proper monitoring of project and obsered kenly		Monopolying group with out decisin through all …..		Orientation in beginning
13	Project approval information through notice, letter		No orentation after proposa approved.		impower BMC activing.
14	MBC called in DSU & made awared regarding project.		No time to time training to BMC for capicity building.		staff mobilization from DADO DLSO
15			No provision for sending technical staff in the group.		sufficins amount available
16			No notice about project buject due to less amount.
19	Timely Work		weak BMC		Capacity building of BMC
20	BMC submit the report work performance		No timely monitoring		Timely monitoring
21	Timely monitoring by various stakholders.		no provision for punishment to group.		Punishment
22	On the spot monitoring.		No provision for award to good work.		Award
23			No monitoring by technical time to time		Technicians provide
24	Monitoring By BMC.		Evaluation by monmitoring person.		Joing monitoring field
25	On the spot technical monitoring from District		Difficult in project monitoring due to inactive BMC		Training to BMC
26	Very useful due to proposal evaluation system		BMC are relative baredformed.		Should be inclusion
27	25000 flow through group		Not satisfy 25000
28	For installation of T.P. 50' Pipe made available.		Expansion due to less amount.
29	Amount allocation for veg. Production.		No timely monitoring
30	Amount for pesticide.		Short period project
31	Verification by all the member		Many times called in district
32	Timely work done .		No sufficant amount according to Programm.		two installment payment
33	DADO stuff given importance of APPSP which disscussion in group.		No timely Budgect system		Timely Budgect release
34	Timely bill settlement.		No project implementation as per time table		Accordint to time table
35	Concerned office support through media.		Not contact with office after complete of payes.		Timely monitoring, and settlement.
36	Supported by bringing project in time.		Short duration according to project nature.		Timely settlement
37			Not addational support to make success to fail project.		Timely settlement
38	Poor, Dalit, Diasble Disadvantage group women have been supported this program.		No timely bill settlement.		Extension of APPSP Time

29. Other Activities

7.Other activity

S.N0.	Activities	When	How many	Major out comes
7.1	Service providers Workshop	2061/62,63/64 and2064/65	3	Review of project periodical progress and rectification project in time.
7.2	SED	(9th and 10th August2008	2	18 DADC members, 11 political parties and 19 SPs members were actively participated and live discussion ere made. APPSP is transparent and effective to p&E group
7.3	BMC monitoring		Many times
7.4	DMC monitoring	5th august,08	1	Follow up for extension of APPSP to concerned department and ministry.
7.5	Exchange Visits			not conducted
7.6	Public Auditing		62	Verification of Approved budget and transparency maintained.
7.7	LIF awareness	2061/62	1
7.8	Any other activities completed in the district.
	DEC meeting			Situation up dated and necessary measure taken in time in insurgency.
	Political parties meeting

MAPS,

PHOTOS &

PAPER CUTTINING

6\o'j]n tyf kDk;]6 kl/of]hgfsf] :ynut cg'udg

INVENTORY, REGISTER, REPORTS/ DOCUMENTS, FILES AND BOOK/ BOOKLETS

APPSP DSU

Equipment/Furniture Register Up_to_date

Ref. No.	Item	Make & Model	Type	Serial N0.	Date Rec'd	Purchase Price	Location	Disposal
1	Table Fan	Khetan		APPSP/E1	20 Jan '05	2500	DSU Room	To	Date	Authorized
2	Room Heater Fan	Kothari		APPSP/E2	28 Jan '05	1100	DSU Room
3	Bicycle	Hercules/Ranger		APPSP/E3	28 Jan '05	4900	Messenger
4	Computer CPU	Hp/Compaq		APPSP/E4	28 Jan '05	Not Known	PA Room
5	Monitor	hp5500		APPSP/E5	28 Jan '05	Not Known	PA Room
6	Smarts UPS	APC		APPSP/E6	28 Jan '05	Not Known	PA Room
7	Calculator	Casio		APPSP/E7	28 Jan '05	350	DSU Room			Not working
8	Calculator	Casio	JJ-120	APPSP/E8	28 Jan '05	650	DSU Room
9	Thermo Flask	Chinese/Air pot		APPSP/E9	28 May '05	1050	DSU Room
10	Computer Printer	Laser 1160	Hp	APPSP/E10	15 Apr '05	Not Known	DSU Room
11	Motorbike 60-0-4	YBX	YAMAHA	APPSP/E11	16^th Apr '05	Not Known	DPA
12	Motorbike 60-0-3	YBX	YAMAHA	APPSP/E12	16^th Apr '05	Not Known	DPC
13	Helmet 4 Pcs	Index		APPSP/E13	16^th Apr '05	Not Known	DPA/DPC			1 lost
15	Camera	Sony	Digital	APPSP/E14	28^th Oct.2005	not known	DSU
16	Fan	SEC	Table	APPSP/E15	13^th Nov.2005	1050.00	DSU
17	Board map	Wooden		APPSP/F26	11^th Dec.2005	750.00	DSU
18	Telephone	Pan phone		APPSP/E16	13^th Sep.2006	500.00	DSU


19	Monochrome Laser MFP	4 in 1		APPSP/E17	22^nd Sep.2006	not known	DSU
20	Sofa	Wooden		APPSP/F27	5^th Jan. 2007	5900.00	DSU
21	Book Cabinet	Wooden		APPSP/F28	5^th Jan. 2007	5500.00	DSU
22	Revolving Chair	Wooden		APPSP/F29		4500.00	DPC
23	Bicycle	Lady bard		APPSP/E18	5^th Jan. 2007	4700.00	PA
24	Computer Table			APPSP/DADO/F19	6^th Dec.2007	3600.00	DADO
25	Office Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F20	6^th Dec.2007	5000.00	DADO
26	Revolving Chair			APPSP/DADO/F21	6^th Dec.2007	3800.00	DADO
27	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F22	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
28	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F28	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
29	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F29	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
30	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F30	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
31	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F31	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
32	Folding Chair	Steel		APPSP/DADO/F32	6^th Dec.2007	675.00	DADO
33	PVC Carpet 30mt.@120.00			APPSP/DADO/F34	6^th Dec.2007	3600.00	DADO
34	Soft Board	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F23	6^th Dec.2007	1000.00	DADO
35	White Board	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F24	6^th Dec.2007	1000.00	DADO
36	T-Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F25	6^th Dec.2007	1000.00	DADO
37	T-Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F26	6^th Dec.2007	1000.00	DADO
38	Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F27	6^th Dec.2007	700.00	DADO
39	Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F34	6^th Dec.2007	700.00	DADO
40	Table	Wooden		APPSP/DADO/F35	6^th Dec.2007	700.00	DADO
41	Telephone Line	07560557		07560557			DSU

41	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F1	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
42	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F2	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
43	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F3	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
44	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F4	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
45	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F5	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
46	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F6	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
47	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F7	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
48	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F8	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
49	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F9	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
50	Plastic Chair	Dolphin	APPSP/F10	28 Jan. '05	375	DSU Room
51	Steel Cupboard	Godrej	APPSP/F11	28 Jan. '05	4100	DSU Room
52	Computer Table	Taiwan	APPSP/12	28 Jan. '05	4200	DPA Room
53	Revolving Chair	Taiwan	APPSP/13	28 Jan. '05	3700	DSU Room
54	Revolving Chair	Nepali	APPSP/14	28 Jan. '05	2000	DSU Room
55	T/Table	Wooden	APPSP/15	28 Jan. '05	800	DSU Room

56	Wall Rack	Wooden	APPSP/16	28 Jan. '05	900	DSU Room
57	Wall Rack	Wooden	APPSP/17	28 Jan. '05	900	DSU Room
58	Wall Rack	Wooden	APPSP/18	28 Jan. '05	900	DSU Room
59	Bench		APPSP/19	28 Jan. '05	800	DSU Room
60	T/ Table		APPSP/20	28 Jan. '05	1000	DPA Room
61	Office Table		APPSP/21	28 Jan. '05	3100	DSU Room
62	White Board		APPSP/22	28 Jan. '05	450	DSU Room
63	White Board		APPSP/23	28 Jan. '05	450	DADO Room
64	Soft Board		APPSP/24	15 Feb '05	800	DSU Room
65	White Board		APPSP/25	15 Feb '05	300	DSU Room

List of Registers, Report/ documents and files

SNO	Items	Qnty
A	Register
1	Entry	1
2	Dispatch	1
3	DEF proposal Submission	1
4	LiF proposal submission	1
5	DSU	2
6	TSC	1
7	Leadger no1 A	1
8	Leadger No2 B	1
9	Visitor	1
10	SP coordination meeting	1
11	VIP personnel/ activity	1
12	Proposal returning	1
13	Inventory	1
14	LLW	1


B	Report / Document
1	Monthly, trimester and annual progress NPC 2061-65	1/1
2	SP workshop proceedings61-64, 64-65 in CSU	1/1
3	Important document (SP member ship profile, DEF proposal model, PA guide line, Project implN guide line , FG bylaws 2,Animal insurance regulation, VDC & tole profile, Fund disbursement bsed on VDC of DADF, Mid term review report, DADF impact report, Dist Fact sheet, dist profile of kapil, Guideline od progress report revised DADF bylaws)	1/1
4	DADF by laws ang guide line revised	1/1
5	Budget detail of LIF/DEF 62-65	1/1
6	Financial Norms for DADF implementation	1
7	Decentralized W/s Proceeding	1
8	LLW report	1
9	Annual report 061-64	1/1
10	Monitoring report 061-65	1/1
11	DEF/ LIF beneficiaries profile061-64	1/1


C	Files
1	Incoming line agencies	1
2	Incoming CSu	1
3	Program format	1
4	Formats	1
5	LIF progress report	1
6	SP NGO progress report	1
7	Letter to CSU	1
8	Office Copy	1
9	Miscellaneous	1
10	APPSP material	1
11	Agreement paper	1
12	Annual program	1
13	BTOR	1
14	Publications of kapilvastu and other district	1

D	Books/ booklets
	APPSP guide line 1234	1
1	Periodical plan DDC	1
2	Puspanjali
3	CLC sustainability	1
4	Public Audit	1
5	Citzen charter	1
6	Information of Kapilvstu DDC	1

7	Clothed pack proposal DEF/LIF awarded nd rejected	11

STAFFS DETAIL

DSU office staff name:
S.N0.	Name	Position
1	Mr. Makbool Ali	DPC
2	Mr. Shree Bhagawan Thakur	DPA
3	Mrs. Shakti Karki	PA
4	Mr. Buddhi Sagar Bhattrai	Messenger
DADO staff name:
S.N0.	name	Position
1	Khursed A Khan	F.SADO
2	Makbool Ali	Planning Officer
3	Vishnu kafle	Crop Saving Officer
4	Vishnu Raj Tandan	Ag. Extension Officer
5	Madhusudhan Upadhya	Ag. Extension Officer
6	Ram Narayan Upadhyay	Fish Dev. Officer
7	Abdul Kyum	Planning Officer
8	Dilip Kumar Singh	Crop Dev. Officer
9	Chaturbhuji Chaudhari	horticulture Officer
10	Pancham Yadav	Ag. Extension Officer
11	Rajendra Pd. Chaudhari	Technical Assistant
12	Ram Krishna Kahar	Technical Assistant
13	Mohar Ali	Technical Assistant
14	Bhakta Bd. Rayamajhi	Accountent
15	Dhani Ram Acharya	Technical Assistant
16	Shivalal Gupta	Technical Assistant
17	Tikaram Pokhrel	Technical Assistant
18	Bishnu Pd. Chaudhari	Technical Assistant
19	Santosh Kumar Bhusal	Technical Assistant
20	Youwaraja Upadhyaya	Technical Assistant
21	Bedu Pd. Upadhyaya	Technical Assistant
22	Jit Ram Pd Chaudhari	Technical Assistant
23	Ram Kuber Yadav	J.Technical Assistant
24	Ramkeshor Yadav	J.Technical Assistant
25	Nandalal Gupta	J.Technical Assistant
26	Vishwa Raj Yagle	J.Technical Assistant
27	Surya Bd. Regmi	Storkeeper
28	Bhagawat Pd. Yadav	J.Technical Assistant
29	Krishna Pd. Khanal	J.Technical Assistant
30	Shivalal Ghimire	J.Technical Assistant
31	Hem Bd. Thapa	Driver
32	Ram Samujha Kahar	Peon
33	Shivanarayan Kahar	Peon
34	Shailesh Pathak	Peon
35	Ravendra Chaube	Peon
36	Aaitabari Chaudhari	Peon
37	Pravunath Kurmi	Peon
38	Chhedi Pd. Kurmi	Peon
39	Ghanshyam Kurmi	Peon
40	Dukhram Loniya	Peon
41	Balji Kurmi	Peon
42	Ram Krishna Chaudhari	Peon
43	Dhanai Ahir	Peon
44	Radheshyam Bari	Peon
45	Shiva Pd. Yadav	Peon

DLSO office staff name:
S.N0.	name	Position
1	Dr.Pradeep Sharma	LSO
2	Laxmanlal Srivastav	LST
3	Abdul Salam	LST
4	Iswar Chandra Chaudhari	AHT
5	krishna Pd. Bhattarai	LST
6	Ram Bilas Yadav	AHT
7	Mahendra Prakas Bhusal	Accountent
8	Bushnu Pd. Murau	LST
9	Bechan Pd. Chaudhari	LST
10	Giriraj Poudel	AHT
11	Nandakishwar Upadhyaya	AHT
12	Gopal Pd. Kurmi	LST
13	Shiva Pd. Subedi	Store Keeper
14	Ram Sahaya harijan	JAHT
15	Ashyarya Acharya	OJT
16	Dhurba Raj Gyawali	JAHT
17	Dilliraj Marasini	JAHT
18	Asarphi Yadav	JAHT
19	Sanjay Kumar Saha	JLST
20	Vijay Dhakal	JLST
21	Khim Bd. Tandan	JLST
22	Ram Pd. Adikari	JAHT
23	Deviram Achary	JAHT
24	Rudal Pd. yadav	JAHT
25	Sita Chhetri	JAHT
26	Ram Bikram Pandey	Peon
27	Sharmaraj Kohar	Peon
28	Kanhaiya Raidas	Driver
29	Tribhuwan Pd. Kohar	Peon
30	Om Prakash Pandey	Peon
31	Churamani Ghimire	Peon
32	Khumananda Khanal	Peon
33	Mohan Lal Neupane	Peon
34	Narayan Pd. Panthi	Peon
35	Ram Milan Kahar	Peon
36	Baljit Pasi	Peon
37	Tirath Kahar	Peon
38	Santaram Yadav	Peon
39	Surendra Pd. Chaudhari	Peon
40	Chhabilal Pokhrel	Peon
41	Ashok Kumar Mishra	Peon
42	Dharma Raj Neupane	Peon
43	Santaram Badhai	Peon
	DDC Staffs

खेतबारी Khetbari

Monday, July 19, 2021

District Programme Completion Report 2065, APPSP

2.3 VDCs Coverage

4. District Extension Fund (DEF)

4.1 Beneficiaries Composition

5.1 Beneficiaries Composition

6. Group type

7 . Types of Project activities

8. Types of Service Providers

10. DADF activities:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive